Stanley Hoffmann’s Critique of Hans Morgenthau’s Political Realism

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Tocqueville Review Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.3138/TTR.39.2.63
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins
{"title":"Stanley Hoffmann’s Critique of Hans Morgenthau’s Political Realism","authors":"Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins","doi":"10.3138/TTR.39.2.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article begins by arguing that Raymond Aron’s interest in the burgeoning field of international relations theory was fundamentally motivated by the attempt to provide an alternative to Hans Morgenthau’s Politics Among Nations. Throughout his book Paix et guerre Aron expressed a consistent worry that Morgenthau’s political realism was too influenced by a dangerous strain of German power politics which he identified with the thought of Carl Schmitt. The article, then, suggests that Morgenthau, frustrated by Aron’s accusations, perhaps played a key role in preventing Paix et guerre from having the type of American reception that Aron had anticipated. It concludes by suggesting that Stanley Hoffmann’s early forays of the 1950s and 1960s into international relations realism theory were fundamentally inspired by Aron’s thinking on the matter, which best explains why he proved so critical of Morgenthau’s theory of international relations.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"63 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.39.2.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This article begins by arguing that Raymond Aron’s interest in the burgeoning field of international relations theory was fundamentally motivated by the attempt to provide an alternative to Hans Morgenthau’s Politics Among Nations. Throughout his book Paix et guerre Aron expressed a consistent worry that Morgenthau’s political realism was too influenced by a dangerous strain of German power politics which he identified with the thought of Carl Schmitt. The article, then, suggests that Morgenthau, frustrated by Aron’s accusations, perhaps played a key role in preventing Paix et guerre from having the type of American reception that Aron had anticipated. It concludes by suggesting that Stanley Hoffmann’s early forays of the 1950s and 1960s into international relations realism theory were fundamentally inspired by Aron’s thinking on the matter, which best explains why he proved so critical of Morgenthau’s theory of international relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯坦利·霍夫曼对摩根索政治现实主义的批判
摘要:本文首先认为,Raymond Aron对新兴的国际关系理论领域的兴趣从根本上是出于试图为Hans Morgenthau的《国与国之间的政治》提供一种替代方案。在他的书中,阿隆一直担心摩根索的政治现实主义过于受到德国强权政治的危险影响,他认为这与卡尔·施密特的思想一致。因此,这篇文章表明,摩根索对阿隆的指控感到沮丧,可能在阻止派克斯和游击队受到阿隆所期望的美国式接待方面发挥了关键作用。文章最后指出,斯坦利·霍夫曼在20世纪50年代和60年代早期对国际关系现实主义理论的探索从根本上受到了阿隆对这一问题的思考的启发,这最好地解释了为什么他对摩根索的国际关系理论持批评态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
La conversion de l'histoire est-elle possible ? Les limites de l'influence de Carl Schmitt sur Raymond Aron : le concept de souveraineté de l'État et celui de l'hostilité absolue The American Red Cross and Disaster Relief in the 1960s: Nonprofits and Mass Philanthropy in an Era of Rising Expectations Comprendre "L'homme qui comprit la démocratie": Table ronde autour de l'ouvrage d'Olivier Zunz Getting Inequality Right: A Zunzian Perspective on the Reformulation of the American Promise The People's Branch: The U.S. Congress and the Democratic State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1