Efficacy and Safety of Ponesimod in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.1111/ncn3.12669
Sangharsha Thapa, Sangam Shah, Aastha Subedi, Sara Bagherieh, Swati Chand, O. Mirmosayyeb, S. Eckert
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Ponesimod in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review","authors":"Sangharsha Thapa, Sangam Shah, Aastha Subedi, Sara Bagherieh, Swati Chand, O. Mirmosayyeb, S. Eckert","doi":"10.1111/ncn3.12669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One the disease modifying therapies (DMTs) that has been reported to be beneficial in multiple sclerosis (MS) is ponesimod, and as it holds true for all other autoimmune diseases, attempts to design immunosuppressive agents to help control the progression of MS while causing minimal side effects play a pivotal role in helping individuals suffering from the disease. Consequently, we have designed this review to comprehensively look into the safety and efficacy of ponesimod in persons with MS. A systematic database search was performed in March 2021. Double‐blinded RCTs on patients with MS with Ponesimod as their experimental medication were included. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), disability accumulation rate (DAR), the score of Fatigue Symptom and Impact Questionnaire–Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ–RMS), and adverse reactions were interpreted as efficacy and safety measurements, respectively. Ninety‐Five papers were retrieved in the literature search. After duplicate elimination, 92 studies remained. Finally, the review included two studies that met the criteria and used varied study designs. Ponesimod reduced ARR by 30.5% (p value = 0.001), DRA by 58% (p value = 0.29), and FSIQ‐RMS mean score by 3.57 (p value = 0.002). Meanwhile, the drugs have few side effects which were mild or moderate in intensity but has less cardiovascular side effects comparing to other S1P drugs like fingolimod. The advantageous properties of ponesimod in terms of its favorable risk: benefit and convenience profile, ponesimod has been regarded recently as a potential SIP‐1 drug for treating MS.","PeriodicalId":19154,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"10 1","pages":"305 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One the disease modifying therapies (DMTs) that has been reported to be beneficial in multiple sclerosis (MS) is ponesimod, and as it holds true for all other autoimmune diseases, attempts to design immunosuppressive agents to help control the progression of MS while causing minimal side effects play a pivotal role in helping individuals suffering from the disease. Consequently, we have designed this review to comprehensively look into the safety and efficacy of ponesimod in persons with MS. A systematic database search was performed in March 2021. Double‐blinded RCTs on patients with MS with Ponesimod as their experimental medication were included. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), disability accumulation rate (DAR), the score of Fatigue Symptom and Impact Questionnaire–Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ–RMS), and adverse reactions were interpreted as efficacy and safety measurements, respectively. Ninety‐Five papers were retrieved in the literature search. After duplicate elimination, 92 studies remained. Finally, the review included two studies that met the criteria and used varied study designs. Ponesimod reduced ARR by 30.5% (p value = 0.001), DRA by 58% (p value = 0.29), and FSIQ‐RMS mean score by 3.57 (p value = 0.002). Meanwhile, the drugs have few side effects which were mild or moderate in intensity but has less cardiovascular side effects comparing to other S1P drugs like fingolimod. The advantageous properties of ponesimod in terms of its favorable risk: benefit and convenience profile, ponesimod has been regarded recently as a potential SIP‐1 drug for treating MS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ponesimod治疗复发性多发性硬化症的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价
据报道,对多发性硬化症(MS)有益的一种疾病修饰疗法(dmt)是ponesimod,正如它对所有其他自身免疫性疾病都适用一样,尝试设计免疫抑制剂来帮助控制MS的进展,同时造成最小的副作用,在帮助患有该疾病的个体方面发挥关键作用。因此,我们设计了这篇综述来全面研究ponesimod对多发性硬化症患者的安全性和有效性。我们在2021年3月进行了系统的数据库检索。纳入以Ponesimod作为实验药物的MS患者的双盲随机对照试验。年复发率(ARR)、失能累积率(DAR)、疲劳症状和影响问卷-复发性多发性硬化症(FSIQ-RMS)评分、不良反应分别作为疗效和安全性指标。文献检索检索到95篇论文。重复剔除后,剩下92项研究。最后,本综述纳入了两项符合标准的研究,并采用了不同的研究设计。Ponesimod使ARR降低30.5% (p值= 0.001),DRA降低58% (p值= 0.29),FSIQ - RMS平均评分降低3.57 (p值= 0.002)。同时,药物副作用少,为轻度或中度,但与其他S1P药物如fingolimod相比,心血管副作用较小。就其有利的风险、获益和便利性而言,ponesimod最近被认为是治疗多发性硬化症的潜在SIP - 1药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Systemic association of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease: A systematic review of literature Reduction rate of anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibody titer levels is an early prognostic indicator for myasthenia gravis Focal 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: A report of two cases A rare presentation of unilateral posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following a trivial head trauma Efficacy and safety of modified Atkins diet therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy in children and adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1