Final triage methods to decide on home-isolation versus hospitalization in COVID-19 pandemic: a challenge for clinicians

Mojtaba Miladinia, F. Abolnezhadian, J. Voss, Kourosh Zarea, N. Hatamzadeh, Mandana, Ghanavati
{"title":"Final triage methods to decide on home-isolation versus hospitalization in COVID-19 pandemic: a challenge for clinicians","authors":"Mojtaba Miladinia, F. Abolnezhadian, J. Voss, Kourosh Zarea, N. Hatamzadeh, Mandana, Ghanavati","doi":"10.34172/JEPT.2020.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Final patient triage determines which patients can be home-isolated and which patients require hospitalization on the basis to predict the patient’s prognosis most accurately. Final triage is an important link in the clinical management chain of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and a comprehensive review of various patient triage methods is very important to guide decision making and triage efficiency. Decision by clinicians about hospitalization or home-discharge is one of the main challenges in places with limited hospital facilities compared to the high volume of COVID-19 patients. This review was designed to guide clinicians on how to address this challenge. Methods: In this mini review we searched scientific databases to obtain the final triage methods of COVID-19 patients and the important criteria in each method. In order to conducted searches a period from December 2019 to July 2020 was considered. All searches were done in electronic databases and search engines. Results: Findings revealed four current methods for final triage (decision-making regarding home-isolation or hospitalization of COVID-19 patients). These methods included 1) demographic and background information, 2) clinical information, 3) laboratory indicators and 4) initial chest CT-scan. Each of the aforementioned methods encompassed significant criteria according to which decisions on the patient’s prognosis and final triage were made. Finally, by evaluating each final triage method, we found that each method had some limitations. Conclusion: An effective and quick final triage requires simultaneous complementary use of all four methods to compensate for each other’s weaknesses and add to each other’s strengths. It is therefore suggested to assure that clinicians are trained in all four COVID-19 patient’s triage methods and their useful criteria in order to achieve evidence-based performance for better triage (decision between home-isolation versus hospitalization).","PeriodicalId":36499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/JEPT.2020.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Final patient triage determines which patients can be home-isolated and which patients require hospitalization on the basis to predict the patient’s prognosis most accurately. Final triage is an important link in the clinical management chain of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and a comprehensive review of various patient triage methods is very important to guide decision making and triage efficiency. Decision by clinicians about hospitalization or home-discharge is one of the main challenges in places with limited hospital facilities compared to the high volume of COVID-19 patients. This review was designed to guide clinicians on how to address this challenge. Methods: In this mini review we searched scientific databases to obtain the final triage methods of COVID-19 patients and the important criteria in each method. In order to conducted searches a period from December 2019 to July 2020 was considered. All searches were done in electronic databases and search engines. Results: Findings revealed four current methods for final triage (decision-making regarding home-isolation or hospitalization of COVID-19 patients). These methods included 1) demographic and background information, 2) clinical information, 3) laboratory indicators and 4) initial chest CT-scan. Each of the aforementioned methods encompassed significant criteria according to which decisions on the patient’s prognosis and final triage were made. Finally, by evaluating each final triage method, we found that each method had some limitations. Conclusion: An effective and quick final triage requires simultaneous complementary use of all four methods to compensate for each other’s weaknesses and add to each other’s strengths. It is therefore suggested to assure that clinicians are trained in all four COVID-19 patient’s triage methods and their useful criteria in order to achieve evidence-based performance for better triage (decision between home-isolation versus hospitalization).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间决定家庭隔离还是住院的最终分类方法:对临床医生的挑战
目的:在最准确预测患者预后的基础上,最终患者分诊确定哪些患者可以居家隔离,哪些患者需要住院治疗。最终分诊是2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行临床管理链中的重要一环,全面回顾各种患者分诊方法对于指导决策和分诊效率非常重要。与大量新冠肺炎患者相比,临床医生关于住院或家庭出院的决定是医院设施有限的地方面临的主要挑战之一。这篇综述旨在指导临床医生如何应对这一挑战。方法:在这篇小型综述中,我们搜索了科学数据库,以获得新冠肺炎患者的最终分诊方法以及每种方法中的重要标准。为了进行搜索,考虑了2019年12月至2020年7月的时间段。所有搜索都是在电子数据库和搜索引擎中进行的。结果:研究结果揭示了目前最终分诊的四种方法(关于新冠肺炎患者居家隔离或住院的决策)。这些方法包括1)人口统计学和背景信息,2)临床信息,3)实验室指标和4)初步胸部CT扫描。上述每一种方法都包含了重要的标准,根据这些标准来决定患者的预后和最终分诊。最后,通过评估每种最终分诊方法,我们发现每种方法都有一些局限性。结论:有效快速的最终分诊需要同时互补使用所有四种方法,以弥补彼此的弱点,增加彼此的优势。因此,建议确保临床医生接受新冠肺炎患者的所有四种分诊方法及其有用标准的培训,以实现循证表现,从而更好地进行分诊(在家庭隔离与住院之间做出决定)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rhabdomyolysis following electical injury without acute kidney injury Relationship between cardiac ultrasound findings during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the outcome of patients Using Weibull model of survival analysis workflow and its relevant factors: A prospective cohort study Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration Post-traumatic growth and perceived social support in young adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1