{"title":"Sustainability is Dead, Long Live Sustainability! Paving the Way to Include ‘The People’ in Sustainability","authors":"Yannick Griep, J. M. Kraak, Elizabeth M. Beekman","doi":"10.1177/10596011221127107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s world, organisations face an ongoing paradox: relying on (near) slave labour in South-East Asia to satisfy clients’ desire for cheap clothing, or producing locally and thus charging a premium price? Sometimes these paradoxes have no ‘better alternative’ (making a choice between the plague or cholera); continuing to rely on fossil fuels such as oil and gas to keep our cars running or relying on children in sub-Saharan Africa to mine the necessary cobalt minerals to create our electric cars? Debate on such topics is present in the sustainability literature. Sustainability refers to a paradigm involving strategic long-term thinking on environmental, social and economic dimensions in order to meet the companies’ current needs ‘without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, p. 43). In other words, sustainability is traditionally defined as integrating reasonable economic, environmental and social growth opportunities into business strategies (following the same logic as the famous triple-p bottom line that refers to planet, profit and people and which is widely used in CSR; Gallagher et al., 2018). Once just a passing fad, ‘sustainability’ can now be found everywhere and has","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"48 1","pages":"966 - 980"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221127107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In today’s world, organisations face an ongoing paradox: relying on (near) slave labour in South-East Asia to satisfy clients’ desire for cheap clothing, or producing locally and thus charging a premium price? Sometimes these paradoxes have no ‘better alternative’ (making a choice between the plague or cholera); continuing to rely on fossil fuels such as oil and gas to keep our cars running or relying on children in sub-Saharan Africa to mine the necessary cobalt minerals to create our electric cars? Debate on such topics is present in the sustainability literature. Sustainability refers to a paradigm involving strategic long-term thinking on environmental, social and economic dimensions in order to meet the companies’ current needs ‘without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, p. 43). In other words, sustainability is traditionally defined as integrating reasonable economic, environmental and social growth opportunities into business strategies (following the same logic as the famous triple-p bottom line that refers to planet, profit and people and which is widely used in CSR; Gallagher et al., 2018). Once just a passing fad, ‘sustainability’ can now be found everywhere and has
期刊介绍:
Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.