The influence of air supply inlet location on the spatial-temporal distribution of bioaerosol in isolation ward under three mixed ventilation modes

Q1 Engineering Energy and Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enbenv.2022.03.002
Zhijian Liu , Tianci Wang , Yongxin Wang , Haiyang Liu , Guoqing Cao , Song Tang
{"title":"The influence of air supply inlet location on the spatial-temporal distribution of bioaerosol in isolation ward under three mixed ventilation modes","authors":"Zhijian Liu ,&nbsp;Tianci Wang ,&nbsp;Yongxin Wang ,&nbsp;Haiyang Liu ,&nbsp;Guoqing Cao ,&nbsp;Song Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.enbenv.2022.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The outbreak of COVID-19 and the spread of infectious pathogens through bioaerosols have once again aroused widespread concern worldwide. Isolation ward is an important place to prevent the spread of infectious bioaerosols. However, infection of health care workers (HCWs) in the isolation ward often occurs, so it is urgent to carry out relevant research to reduce the cross-infection between HCWs and patients. In this paper, the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of bioaerosols under three mixed ventilation modes in a single ward were studied, namely, upper supply side return air of Case 1 and side supply and side return ventilation are Case 2 and Case 3 respectively. The results show that the removal efficiency of bioaerosol in the ventilation mode of Case 3, in which directional airflow is formed from the air supply inlet to the release source and then to the exhaust outlet, is 46.6% and 67.7% higher than that of Case 1 and Case 2, respectively. In addition, ventilation methods based on mixed theory do not guarantee good air quality in the breathing zone (1.3 m to 1.7 m) of HCWs, which may increase the inhalation risk for HCWs. It is hoped that our results can provide some useful suggestions for optimizing the airflow layout of the isolation ward, reducing the risk of cross-infection, and virus elimination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33659,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Built Environment","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 445-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266612332200023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 and the spread of infectious pathogens through bioaerosols have once again aroused widespread concern worldwide. Isolation ward is an important place to prevent the spread of infectious bioaerosols. However, infection of health care workers (HCWs) in the isolation ward often occurs, so it is urgent to carry out relevant research to reduce the cross-infection between HCWs and patients. In this paper, the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of bioaerosols under three mixed ventilation modes in a single ward were studied, namely, upper supply side return air of Case 1 and side supply and side return ventilation are Case 2 and Case 3 respectively. The results show that the removal efficiency of bioaerosol in the ventilation mode of Case 3, in which directional airflow is formed from the air supply inlet to the release source and then to the exhaust outlet, is 46.6% and 67.7% higher than that of Case 1 and Case 2, respectively. In addition, ventilation methods based on mixed theory do not guarantee good air quality in the breathing zone (1.3 m to 1.7 m) of HCWs, which may increase the inhalation risk for HCWs. It is hoped that our results can provide some useful suggestions for optimizing the airflow layout of the isolation ward, reducing the risk of cross-infection, and virus elimination.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种混合通风方式下送风入口位置对隔离病房生物气溶胶时空分布的影响
新冠肺炎疫情和传染性病原体通过生物气溶胶传播再次引起全球广泛关注。隔离病房是防止传染性生物气溶胶传播的重要场所。然而,隔离病房内医护人员的感染经常发生,因此急需开展相关研究,以减少医护人员与患者之间的交叉感染。本文研究了单病房三种混合通风模式下生物气溶胶的时空分布特征,即Case 1为上送风侧回风,Case 2和Case 3分别为侧送风侧回风。结果表明,在Case 3的通风方式下,从送风口到释放源再到排气口形成定向气流,对生物气溶胶的去除效率分别比Case 1和Case 2高46.6%和67.7%。此外,基于混合理论的通风方式并不能保证HCWs呼吸区(1.3 m ~ 1.7 m)空气质量良好,可能增加HCWs吸入风险。希望本研究结果能为优化隔离病房的气流布局、降低交叉感染风险、消除病毒提供有益的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Built Environment
Energy and Built Environment Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Overview of the application status and development trends of hydropower and geothermal power in New Zealand Study on the Deposition Characteristics of Fine Particles at Local Components in Air Conditioning Ventilation Ducts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1