Association of maternal Body Mass Index and parity on induced labor stages.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-07 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05092-8
Daniela Menichini, Francesca Monari, Giovanna Gemmellaro, Elisabetta Petrella, Alba Ricchi, Ramona Infante, Maria T Molinazzi, Fabio Facchinetti, Isabella Neri
{"title":"Association of maternal Body Mass Index and parity on induced labor stages.","authors":"Daniela Menichini, Francesca Monari, Giovanna Gemmellaro, Elisabetta Petrella, Alba Ricchi, Ramona Infante, Maria T Molinazzi, Fabio Facchinetti, Isabella Neri","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05092-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a widespread pandemic and obstetric care must adapt to meet the needs of obese pregnant women. Little is known about the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the induction of labor (IOL). Therefore, our objective was to evaluate if the duration of the first and second stages of IOL is affected by maternal BMI in nulliparous and multiparous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included singleton pregnancies at term with cephalic presentation whose labor was induced from June 2018 to December 2019. Women were divided into two groups according to pre-pregnancy BMI in normal weight and obese women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 668 women with IOL were included in the study, among them, 349 had a normal weight and 321 were obese. The first stage of labor was longer in obese multiparous than normal-weight women (normal weight 81.98±71.7 vs. obese 134.3±158.1 min, P=0.000), while the second stage resulted significantly shorter (normal weight 22.2±27.8 vs. obese 14.3±14.2 min, P=0.000). The total time elapsed from IOL beginning and delivery was significantly higher in obese nulliparous (normal weight 10.4±19.7 vs. obese 22.0±26.2 h, P=0.000). Operative vaginal deliveries, emergency cesarean section, and failed IOL resulted to be similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obese multiparous women have longer first stages of labor while shorter second stages. The total time for induced obese nulliparous to reach delivery is higher than the normal weight. It might be reasonable to reconsider the partographs according to maternal BMI in case of induced labor for future obstetric practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05092-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a widespread pandemic and obstetric care must adapt to meet the needs of obese pregnant women. Little is known about the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the induction of labor (IOL). Therefore, our objective was to evaluate if the duration of the first and second stages of IOL is affected by maternal BMI in nulliparous and multiparous women.

Methods: We included singleton pregnancies at term with cephalic presentation whose labor was induced from June 2018 to December 2019. Women were divided into two groups according to pre-pregnancy BMI in normal weight and obese women.

Results: A total of 668 women with IOL were included in the study, among them, 349 had a normal weight and 321 were obese. The first stage of labor was longer in obese multiparous than normal-weight women (normal weight 81.98±71.7 vs. obese 134.3±158.1 min, P=0.000), while the second stage resulted significantly shorter (normal weight 22.2±27.8 vs. obese 14.3±14.2 min, P=0.000). The total time elapsed from IOL beginning and delivery was significantly higher in obese nulliparous (normal weight 10.4±19.7 vs. obese 22.0±26.2 h, P=0.000). Operative vaginal deliveries, emergency cesarean section, and failed IOL resulted to be similar between the groups.

Conclusions: Obese multiparous women have longer first stages of labor while shorter second stages. The total time for induced obese nulliparous to reach delivery is higher than the normal weight. It might be reasonable to reconsider the partographs according to maternal BMI in case of induced labor for future obstetric practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引产阶段产妇体重指数与胎次的关系。
背景:肥胖是一种广泛的流行病,产科护理必须适应肥胖孕妇的需求。关于身体质量指数(BMI)对引产(IOL)的影响知之甚少。因此,我们的目的是评估未产和多产妇女的第一和第二阶段人工晶状体的持续时间是否受到母亲BMI的影响。方法纳入2018年6月至2019年12月引产的足月单胎妊娠头位妊娠。研究人员根据正常体重和肥胖女性孕前体重指数将她们分为两组。结果共纳入668例人工晶状体患者,其中体重正常349例,肥胖321例。肥胖多产妇女第一产程较正常体重妇女长(正常体重81.98±71.7比肥胖134.3±158.1 (min), p=0.000),第二产程明显短(正常体重22.2±27.8比肥胖14.3±14.2 (min), p=0.000)。肥胖无产子患者从开始人工晶状体植入到分娩的总时间明显更长(正常体重10.4±19.7 vs肥胖体重22.0±26.2 (h), p=0.000)。阴道手术分娩、紧急剖宫产和人工晶状体失败的结果在两组之间相似。结论多胎妇女第一产程较长,第二产程较短。诱导肥胖无产者到达分娩的总时间高于正常体重。在引产的情况下,根据产妇BMI重新考虑产程可能是合理的,以便将来的产科实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
The predictive role of uterocervical angle in labor outcomes: a narrative review. Intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich-plasma: myth or reality? Age and phytoestrogen use, but not resilience, influence urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women. Assessment of ovarian cortex follicles in chemotherapy naïve and chemotherapy exposed patients. Intrauterine device use in adolescence: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1