Current status of insecticide resistance in Aphis gossypii and Aphis spiraecola (Hemiptera: Aphididae) under central Indian conditions in citrus

A. George, C. Rao, S. Rahangadale
{"title":"Current status of insecticide resistance in Aphis gossypii and Aphis spiraecola (Hemiptera: Aphididae) under central Indian conditions in citrus","authors":"A. George, C. Rao, S. Rahangadale","doi":"10.1080/23312025.2019.1660494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Most commonly followed practice to manage sucking insect pests during flushing season in citrus by citrus growers is foliar application of insecticides. Leaf dip bioassays for insecticides, viz., acephate 75 SP, dimethoate 30 EC, quinalphos 25 EC, chlorpyriphos 20 EC, spinosad 45 SC, imidacloprid 17.8 SL and thiamethoxam 25 WG, were conducted to assess the susceptibility of field collected Aphis gossypii and Aphis spiraecola (Hemiptera–Aphididae) adults. In general, the resistance ratio (RR) values indicated that the current levels in aphid population from major citrus belts of Maharashtra are in very low resistance category. Among seven insecticides tested on adult aphids collected from Nagpur, Amravati and Wardha districts during 2013–2015, neonicotinoid group proved the most effective in causing mortality as indicated by the lower LC50 values (0.01–0.04 ppm for imidacloprid; 0.03–0.05 ppm for thiamethoxam). Among the three locations, Amravati population has registered comparatively higher RR values indicating less susceptibility to insecticides. RR values calculated based on the base population indicated that the current resistance levels are between no and very low levels (1 < RR < 10).","PeriodicalId":10412,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23312025.2019.1660494","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312025.2019.1660494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Most commonly followed practice to manage sucking insect pests during flushing season in citrus by citrus growers is foliar application of insecticides. Leaf dip bioassays for insecticides, viz., acephate 75 SP, dimethoate 30 EC, quinalphos 25 EC, chlorpyriphos 20 EC, spinosad 45 SC, imidacloprid 17.8 SL and thiamethoxam 25 WG, were conducted to assess the susceptibility of field collected Aphis gossypii and Aphis spiraecola (Hemiptera–Aphididae) adults. In general, the resistance ratio (RR) values indicated that the current levels in aphid population from major citrus belts of Maharashtra are in very low resistance category. Among seven insecticides tested on adult aphids collected from Nagpur, Amravati and Wardha districts during 2013–2015, neonicotinoid group proved the most effective in causing mortality as indicated by the lower LC50 values (0.01–0.04 ppm for imidacloprid; 0.03–0.05 ppm for thiamethoxam). Among the three locations, Amravati population has registered comparatively higher RR values indicating less susceptibility to insecticides. RR values calculated based on the base population indicated that the current resistance levels are between no and very low levels (1 < RR < 10).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度中部条件下柑橘棉蚜和螺旋体蚜抗药性现状
摘要柑橘种植者在柑橘冲洗季节管理吸吮害虫最常用的做法是叶面施用杀虫剂。采用乙酰甲胺磷75SP、乐果30EC、喹硫磷25EC、毒死蜱20EC、多杀菌素45SC、吡虫啉17.8SL和噻虫嗪25WG等杀虫剂的浸叶生物测定法,对田间采集的棉蚜和螺旋体蚜(半翅目-蚜科)成虫的药敏性进行了评价。总的来说,抗性比(RR)值表明,马哈拉施特拉邦主要柑橘带的蚜虫种群目前的水平属于非常低的抗性类别。2013-2015年期间,在那格浦尔、阿姆拉瓦蒂和瓦尔达地区采集的7种成年蚜虫杀虫剂中,新烟碱类杀虫剂被证明在导致死亡方面最有效,其LC50值较低(吡虫啉为0.01-0.04 ppm;噻虫嗪为0.03-0.05 ppm)。在这三个地点中,阿姆拉瓦蒂种群的RR值相对较高,表明对杀虫剂的易感性较低。基于基本人群计算的RR值表明,当前的电阻水平在无和非常低的水平之间(1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1