Unplanned Reoperation And Interventional Radiology Post Appendicectomy: A Meta-Analysis

IF 4.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Technology & Society Pub Date : 2020-10-31 DOI:10.24966/ets-8798/100049
M. Sugrue
{"title":"Unplanned Reoperation And Interventional Radiology Post Appendicectomy: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"M. Sugrue","doi":"10.24966/ets-8798/100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Optimizing delivery of care to patients with appendicitis as part of an emergency general surgery care program is important. Appendicitis is one of commonest emergency surgical presentations and has significant potential morbidity and occasional mortality. Meta-analysis of reinterventions following appendicectomy has not been published. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence and potential predictors of reoperation and interventional radiological (IR) procedures post appendicectomy. Methods: A PROSPERO-registered (ID CRD42017069040) meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines using databases PubMed and Scopus for studies between June 2012 to May 2017 was undertaken. Headings included “reoperation”, “return to operation theatre”, “complication”, “appendicectomy”, “outcome”, “abscess drainage”. Articles scoring ≥16 for comparative and ≥10 for non-comparative using MINORS criteria were included. Results: 2810 articles reviewed were reduced to 52 qualifying studies for a final analysis of 319,053 appendicectomies. Overall, 0.9% (range 0.0% to 14.2%) underwent some form of reintervention. The reoperation rate was 0.6% (range 0.0 to 14.2%) and radiologic drainage rate 1.5% (range 0.0% to 11.1%). Reoperations were significantly associated with a laparoscopic approach, earlier grade of appendicitis and not using drains. Laparoscopy conversion to open and the grade of surgeon performing the appendicectomy did not affect reintervention. Conclusion: This meta-analysis identified a small but notable reoperation and IR rate, significantly increased by complexity of appendicitis and open surgery. Strategies promoting for earlier presentation and diagnosis with laparoscopic approaches may improve overall outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51381,"journal":{"name":"Educational Technology & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Technology & Society","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24966/ets-8798/100049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Optimizing delivery of care to patients with appendicitis as part of an emergency general surgery care program is important. Appendicitis is one of commonest emergency surgical presentations and has significant potential morbidity and occasional mortality. Meta-analysis of reinterventions following appendicectomy has not been published. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence and potential predictors of reoperation and interventional radiological (IR) procedures post appendicectomy. Methods: A PROSPERO-registered (ID CRD42017069040) meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines using databases PubMed and Scopus for studies between June 2012 to May 2017 was undertaken. Headings included “reoperation”, “return to operation theatre”, “complication”, “appendicectomy”, “outcome”, “abscess drainage”. Articles scoring ≥16 for comparative and ≥10 for non-comparative using MINORS criteria were included. Results: 2810 articles reviewed were reduced to 52 qualifying studies for a final analysis of 319,053 appendicectomies. Overall, 0.9% (range 0.0% to 14.2%) underwent some form of reintervention. The reoperation rate was 0.6% (range 0.0 to 14.2%) and radiologic drainage rate 1.5% (range 0.0% to 11.1%). Reoperations were significantly associated with a laparoscopic approach, earlier grade of appendicitis and not using drains. Laparoscopy conversion to open and the grade of surgeon performing the appendicectomy did not affect reintervention. Conclusion: This meta-analysis identified a small but notable reoperation and IR rate, significantly increased by complexity of appendicitis and open surgery. Strategies promoting for earlier presentation and diagnosis with laparoscopic approaches may improve overall outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阑尾切除术后的意外再手术和介入放射学:一项荟萃分析
引言:作为急诊普通外科护理计划的一部分,优化阑尾炎患者的护理非常重要。阑尾炎是最常见的急诊外科表现之一,具有显著的潜在发病率和偶尔的死亡率。阑尾切除术后再干预的荟萃分析尚未发表。这项荟萃分析评估了阑尾切除术后再次手术和介入放射学(IR)手术的发生率和潜在预测因素。方法:在2012年6月至2017年5月期间,根据PRISMA指南,使用PubMed和Scopus数据库进行PROSPERO注册(ID CRD42017069040)荟萃分析。标题包括“再次手术”、“重返手术室”、“并发症”、“阑尾切除术”、“结果”、“脓肿引流”。纳入了使用MINORS标准评分≥16的比较文章和≥10的非比较文章。结果:2810篇综述的文章减少到52篇符合条件的研究,对319053例阑尾切除术进行最终分析。总体而言,0.9%(0.0%-14.2%)接受了某种形式的再干预。再次手术率为0.6%(0.0-14.2%),放射学引流率为1.5%(0.0%-11.1%)。再次手术与腹腔镜入路、早期阑尾炎和不使用引流管显著相关。腹腔镜手术转为开放手术和阑尾切除术的外科医生级别不影响再干预。结论:这项荟萃分析确定了一个小但显著的再手术和IR率,因阑尾炎和开放手术的复杂性而显著增加。促进腹腔镜入路早期表现和诊断的策略可能会改善整体结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Technology & Society
Educational Technology & Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Associating Insulin Instillation with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Insulin Resistance in Diabetic Patients with Infected Foot Wounds Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Case Report Mass testing and containment of Covid-19 Groin Abscess: Assessing The Diagnostic Accuracy Of Emergency Department Clinicians And Imaging Modalities Fulminant Necrotizing Fasciitis And Myositis With Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome In A Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis On Tocilizumab: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1