A Comparative Study of the Early and Short-Term Outcomes of Aortic Replacement in Patients with Stanford type A Aortic Dissection and Ascending Aortic Aneurysm

Erfan Omer Anwar, Shkar Raouf Haji Saeed, A. .
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Early and Short-Term Outcomes of Aortic Replacement in Patients with Stanford type A Aortic Dissection and Ascending Aortic Aneurysm","authors":"Erfan Omer Anwar, Shkar Raouf Haji Saeed, A. .","doi":"10.24017/science.2022.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ascending aortic replacement is a challenging and complex surgery. The mortality, morbidity, and outcomes depend on the causes of the ascending aortic pathology and the type of operation. The research was conducted in a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study of patients undergoing ascending aortic replacement due to dissection or aneurysm. In the hospital, mortality, morbidity, and short-term outcomes were measured. A total of 85 patients were included in this study. Of them, 65.9% were male, and 34.1% were female. Thirty-three patients had Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD), whereas 52 had ascending aortic aneurysm (ASAA). Early mortality was (21.21% and 1.9%) for STAAD and ASAA, respectively, while the survival rate after one year was (75.8% and 96.15 %) for ascending dissection and aneurysm, respectively. The results of our study show higher early surgical mortality and morbidity and a lower short-term survival rate for STAAD surgery compared with ASAA surgery.","PeriodicalId":17866,"journal":{"name":"Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24017/science.2022.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ascending aortic replacement is a challenging and complex surgery. The mortality, morbidity, and outcomes depend on the causes of the ascending aortic pathology and the type of operation. The research was conducted in a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study of patients undergoing ascending aortic replacement due to dissection or aneurysm. In the hospital, mortality, morbidity, and short-term outcomes were measured. A total of 85 patients were included in this study. Of them, 65.9% were male, and 34.1% were female. Thirty-three patients had Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD), whereas 52 had ascending aortic aneurysm (ASAA). Early mortality was (21.21% and 1.9%) for STAAD and ASAA, respectively, while the survival rate after one year was (75.8% and 96.15 %) for ascending dissection and aneurysm, respectively. The results of our study show higher early surgical mortality and morbidity and a lower short-term survival rate for STAAD surgery compared with ASAA surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stanford A型主动脉夹层与升主动脉瘤患者主动脉置换术早期与短期疗效的比较研究
升主动脉置换术是一项具有挑战性和复杂性的手术。死亡率、发病率和结果取决于升主动脉病变的原因和手术类型。该研究是在一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究中进行的,研究对象是因夹层或动脉瘤接受升主动脉置换术的患者。在医院,对死亡率、发病率和短期结果进行了测量。本研究共纳入85例患者。其中男性占65.9%,女性占34.1%。33例为斯坦福A型主动脉夹层(STAAD), 52例为升主动脉瘤(ASAA)。STAAD和ASAA的早期死亡率分别为21.21%和1.9%,上升夹层和动脉瘤的1年后生存率分别为75.8%和96.15%。我们的研究结果表明,与ASAA手术相比,STAAD手术的早期手术死亡率和发病率较高,短期生存率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Wavelet Shrinkage Mixed with a Single-level 2D Discrete Wavelet Transform for Image Denoising Assessing the Impact of Modified Initial Abstraction Ratios and Slope Adjusted Curve Number on Runoff Prediction in the Watersheds of Sulaimani Province. Assessment of the Antifungal Activity of PMMA-MgO and PMMA-Ag Nanocomposite Multi-Label Feature Selection with Graph-based Ant Colony Optimization and Generalized Jaccard Similarity Evaluate the Implementation of WHO Infection Prevention and Control Core Components Among Health Care Facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1