‘This was the Better Way’: The Restoration Afterlives of Ben Jonson’s Comic Designs

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS FORUM FOR MODERN LANGUAGE STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1093/fmls/cqac038
John H Cameron, J. Goossen
{"title":"‘This was the Better Way’: The Restoration Afterlives of Ben Jonson’s Comic Designs","authors":"John H Cameron, J. Goossen","doi":"10.1093/fmls/cqac038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The dramatists of the Restoration stage reveal the guiding influence of Ben Jonson, giving his plays a strong comedic afterlife, particularly with respect to his construction of his plots and his sense of comedic design. This article explores that influence by first considering the influences on Jonson’s own concept of comic design, particularly as derived from Aristotle, and the late-antique grammarians Euanthius and Donatus. Jonson follows Aristotle’s distinction of comedy from tragedy on the basis of the ‘laughable’ moral quality of its characters. When paired with Jonson’s own didactic bent, this distinction shaped his ‘humours’-based approach to character, and his plots’ exposure and mockery of those characters. Daniël Heinsius’s commentaries on Aristotle’s Poetics show clear consonance with Jonson’s tight integration of his humorous characters into densely unified plots by way of the trickster characters’ hoaxes. Jonson also finds in Scaliger’s unique concept of catastasis, the penultimate movement of comic plot, a definitive tactic for achieving that integration and exposure. In the light of these claims, we look at three of Jonson’s plays, Every Man Out of His Humour (1599), Volpone (1605) and Epicene, or the Silent Woman (1609), which depict his developing techniques of character, exposure hoaxes and catastasis. This leads to the later seventeenth century and John Dryden’s attentive analysis of Jonson’s comic plots, especially that of Epicene. We then show how the Jonsonian traits singled out by Dryden were used and adapted by William Wycherley in The Country Wife (1675) and William Congreve in The Way of the World (1700).","PeriodicalId":42991,"journal":{"name":"FORUM FOR MODERN LANGUAGE STUDIES","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM FOR MODERN LANGUAGE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqac038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dramatists of the Restoration stage reveal the guiding influence of Ben Jonson, giving his plays a strong comedic afterlife, particularly with respect to his construction of his plots and his sense of comedic design. This article explores that influence by first considering the influences on Jonson’s own concept of comic design, particularly as derived from Aristotle, and the late-antique grammarians Euanthius and Donatus. Jonson follows Aristotle’s distinction of comedy from tragedy on the basis of the ‘laughable’ moral quality of its characters. When paired with Jonson’s own didactic bent, this distinction shaped his ‘humours’-based approach to character, and his plots’ exposure and mockery of those characters. Daniël Heinsius’s commentaries on Aristotle’s Poetics show clear consonance with Jonson’s tight integration of his humorous characters into densely unified plots by way of the trickster characters’ hoaxes. Jonson also finds in Scaliger’s unique concept of catastasis, the penultimate movement of comic plot, a definitive tactic for achieving that integration and exposure. In the light of these claims, we look at three of Jonson’s plays, Every Man Out of His Humour (1599), Volpone (1605) and Epicene, or the Silent Woman (1609), which depict his developing techniques of character, exposure hoaxes and catastasis. This leads to the later seventeenth century and John Dryden’s attentive analysis of Jonson’s comic plots, especially that of Epicene. We then show how the Jonsonian traits singled out by Dryden were used and adapted by William Wycherley in The Country Wife (1675) and William Congreve in The Way of the World (1700).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这是更好的方式”:本·约翰逊漫画设计的修复
复辟时期的剧作家们揭示了本·琼森的指导作用,使他的戏剧有了强烈的喜剧色彩,尤其是在他对情节的构建和喜剧设计感方面。本文通过首先考虑对Jonson自己的漫画设计概念的影响来探讨这种影响,特别是从亚里士多德和已故古代语法学家Euanthius和Donatus那里得到的影响。琼森遵循亚里士多德对喜剧和悲剧的区分,是基于剧中人物“可笑”的道德品质。当与琼森自己的说教倾向相结合时,这种区别塑造了他以“幽默”为基础的性格方式,以及他的情节对这些角色的揭露和嘲笑。达尼埃尔·海因修斯对亚里士多德诗学的评论与琼森通过骗子角色的恶作剧将他的幽默人物紧密地融入到紧密统一的情节中的观点是一致的。Jonson还从Scaliger独特的停滞概念中发现,这是漫画情节的倒数第二个动作,是实现这种融合和曝光的决定性策略。根据这些说法,我们来看看琼森的三部戏剧,《每个男人都走出了他的幽默》(1599年)、《Volpone》(1605年)和《Epicene》,或者《沉默的女人》(1609年),它们描绘了他性格发展、暴露骗局和抑郁的技巧。这导致了17世纪后期,约翰·德莱顿对琼森的喜剧情节,尤其是伊比克尼的喜剧情节进行了细致的分析。然后,我们展示了威廉·威彻利(William Wycherley)在《乡村妻子》(1675)和威廉·康格里夫(William Congreve)在《世界之路》(1700)中如何使用和改编德莱顿(Dryden)所挑选的约翰逊特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Since its foundation in 1965, Forum for Modern Language Studies has published articles on all aspects of literary and linguistic studies, from the Middle Ages to the present day. The journal sets out to reflect the essential pluralism of modern language and literature studies and to provide a forum for worldwide scholarly discussion. Each annual volume normally includes two thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
Refugee Memoirs: Kouamé’s Revenu des ténèbres (2018) and Dina Nayeri’s The Ungrateful Refugee (2019) and the challenge of refugee narratives Beauty with an Explanation and the Poetics of Acculturation: How, and Why, Michael Ondaatje’s Poetic Novels Work The Semantics of Beauty in Spanish Adjectives: Conceptual Structure and Implications for Folk Aesthetics ‘Ein Strudel der Selbstauflösung’: The Contested Role of Form in Poetry from the Concentration Camps The Dual Role of Code-Switching in Alejandro Morales’s Reto en el Paraíso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1