The role of institutional quality and industry dynamism in explaining firm performance in emerging economies

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-02 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1479
Mario Kafouros, Murod Aliyev, Panagiotis Piperopoulos, Alan Kai Ming Au, Joanne Wing Yee Ho, Susanna Yee Na Wong
{"title":"The role of institutional quality and industry dynamism in explaining firm performance in emerging economies","authors":"Mario Kafouros,&nbsp;Murod Aliyev,&nbsp;Panagiotis Piperopoulos,&nbsp;Alan Kai Ming Au,&nbsp;Joanne Wing Yee Ho,&nbsp;Susanna Yee Na Wong","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study explains how heterogeneity in firm competitiveness and performance in emerging economies is influenced jointly by the institutional quality of countries and interindustry variations in technological and market dynamism. The analysis of 12,888 firms from 16 emerging economies shows that while the performance advantages of institutional quality are strengthened for firms in technologically dynamic industries, the opposite pattern emerges in high market-dynamism industries. The study advances the institution-based view by explaining the mechanisms through which such effects occur and why two industry-specific boundary conditions (technological and market dynamism) influence differently the relationship between institutional quality and firm performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigates how the performance of firms in emerging economies is influenced by the quality of institutions in each country as well as by the technological and market dynamism in the industry in which each firm operates. To examine these relationships, the study analyzes a sample of 12,888 firms from 16 emerging economies. The results indicate that institutional quality enhances firm performance and that these positive effects are stronger in technologically dynamic industries than in industries that are less technologically dynamic. However, the opposite pattern of results emerges for market dynamism, indicating that the role of institutional quality in enhancing firm performance is weaker in industries that exhibit a high degree of market dynamism than in industries that are less volatile in market demand.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"56-83"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gsj.1479","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Summary

This study explains how heterogeneity in firm competitiveness and performance in emerging economies is influenced jointly by the institutional quality of countries and interindustry variations in technological and market dynamism. The analysis of 12,888 firms from 16 emerging economies shows that while the performance advantages of institutional quality are strengthened for firms in technologically dynamic industries, the opposite pattern emerges in high market-dynamism industries. The study advances the institution-based view by explaining the mechanisms through which such effects occur and why two industry-specific boundary conditions (technological and market dynamism) influence differently the relationship between institutional quality and firm performance.

Managerial Summary

This study investigates how the performance of firms in emerging economies is influenced by the quality of institutions in each country as well as by the technological and market dynamism in the industry in which each firm operates. To examine these relationships, the study analyzes a sample of 12,888 firms from 16 emerging economies. The results indicate that institutional quality enhances firm performance and that these positive effects are stronger in technologically dynamic industries than in industries that are less technologically dynamic. However, the opposite pattern of results emerges for market dynamism, indicating that the role of institutional quality in enhancing firm performance is weaker in industries that exhibit a high degree of market dynamism than in industries that are less volatile in market demand.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度质量和行业活力在解释新兴经济体企业绩效中的作用
研究摘要 本研究解释了新兴经济体企业竞争力和绩效的异质性如何受到国家制度质量以及行业间技术和市场活力差异的共同影响。对来自 16 个新兴经济体的 12 888 家企业的分析表明,制度质量的绩效优势在技术活跃行业的企业中得到加强,而在市场活跃度高的行业则出现了相反的模式。本研究解释了产生这种效应的机制,以及为什么两个特定行业的边界条件(技术和市场活力)会对制度质量与企业绩效之间的关系产生不同影响,从而推进了基于制度的观点。 管理总结 本研究探讨了新兴经济体企业的绩效如何受到各国制度质量以及企业所处行业的技术和市场活力的影响。为了研究这些关系,本研究分析了来自 16 个新兴经济体的 12 888 家企业样本。研究结果表明,制度质量能提高企业绩效,而且在技术活跃的行业中,这些积极效应要强于技术不那么活跃的行业。然而,在市场活力方面却出现了相反的结果,表明在市场活力较强的行业中,制度质量对提高企业绩效的作用弱于市场需求波动较小的行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC A perspective on three trade-offs of blockchain technology for the global strategy of the MNC Issue Information - TOC Inward FDI and local firms' political connections in emerging markets: Evidence from China Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1