Application of Replicate Organism Detection and Counting Method (RODAC) in Measuring Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Contamination in High Burden Laboratories

L. Chaidir, Neng Rina Susilawati, Mandala Ajie, J. Annisa, M. Jihadah
{"title":"Application of Replicate Organism Detection and Counting Method (RODAC) in Measuring Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Contamination in High Burden Laboratories","authors":"L. Chaidir, Neng Rina Susilawati, Mandala Ajie, J. Annisa, M. Jihadah","doi":"10.15850/amj.v9n4.2789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Technicians working in high burden tuberculosis (TB) laboratories pose a higher risk of being infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical samples. Contamination control is mandatory to detect the release of bacteria into the working environment and to minimize the risk of exposure to the workers. The contamination measurement is rarely performed due to the lack of standard methodology. This study optimized and applied a unique culture-based method named Replicate Organism Detection and Counting (RODAC) plates to assess the presence of M. tuberculosis contaminant in the laboratory with high burden of clinical samples. Methods: RODAC was applied on twenty working surfaces in the Mycobacteriology Laboratory of Universitas Padjadjaran. The results of RODAC were compared with DNA-based detection from the same working surfaces using in-house IS6110 real-time PCR (IS6110-qPCR). The detection limit of the RODAC plate was 19.6 CFU mL-1.Results: From all working surfaces tested, two distinct colonies were found on RODAC plate stamped on the Ziehl-Neelsen staining basin. Those colonies were identified as M. tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), as confirmed by the MPT64 antigen test and the presence of acid-fast bacilli. IS6110-qPCR detected the presence of M. tuberculosis DNA in ten sampling points, including the ZN staining basin, incubators, and microscopy areas. IS6110-qPCR detected more working surface contamination versus RODAC. However, it was noted that RODAC, which was a culture-based method, detected live bacteria, while PCR could not distinguish between live and dead bacteria.Conclusion: The application of the RODAC plate is more suitable for monitoring the contamination of live bacteria in the working environment and to inform a proper corrective action.","PeriodicalId":31310,"journal":{"name":"Althea Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Althea Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15850/amj.v9n4.2789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Technicians working in high burden tuberculosis (TB) laboratories pose a higher risk of being infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical samples. Contamination control is mandatory to detect the release of bacteria into the working environment and to minimize the risk of exposure to the workers. The contamination measurement is rarely performed due to the lack of standard methodology. This study optimized and applied a unique culture-based method named Replicate Organism Detection and Counting (RODAC) plates to assess the presence of M. tuberculosis contaminant in the laboratory with high burden of clinical samples. Methods: RODAC was applied on twenty working surfaces in the Mycobacteriology Laboratory of Universitas Padjadjaran. The results of RODAC were compared with DNA-based detection from the same working surfaces using in-house IS6110 real-time PCR (IS6110-qPCR). The detection limit of the RODAC plate was 19.6 CFU mL-1.Results: From all working surfaces tested, two distinct colonies were found on RODAC plate stamped on the Ziehl-Neelsen staining basin. Those colonies were identified as M. tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), as confirmed by the MPT64 antigen test and the presence of acid-fast bacilli. IS6110-qPCR detected the presence of M. tuberculosis DNA in ten sampling points, including the ZN staining basin, incubators, and microscopy areas. IS6110-qPCR detected more working surface contamination versus RODAC. However, it was noted that RODAC, which was a culture-based method, detected live bacteria, while PCR could not distinguish between live and dead bacteria.Conclusion: The application of the RODAC plate is more suitable for monitoring the contamination of live bacteria in the working environment and to inform a proper corrective action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复制生物检测计数法(RODAC)在高负荷实验室结核分枝杆菌污染检测中的应用
背景:在高负担结核病实验室工作的技术人员从临床样本中感染结核分枝杆菌的风险较高。污染控制是强制性的,以检测细菌释放到工作环境中,并尽量减少工人接触的风险。由于缺乏标准的方法,很少进行污染测量。本研究优化并应用了一种独特的基于培养的方法——复制生物检测与计数(duplicate Organism Detection and Counting, RODAC)板来评估临床样品负担高的实验室中是否存在结核分枝杆菌污染物。方法:将RODAC应用于Padjadjaran大学分枝杆菌学实验室的20个工作面上。将RODAC的结果与使用内部IS6110实时荧光定量PCR (IS6110- qpcr)在相同工作面上基于dna的检测结果进行比较。RODAC板检出限为19.6 CFU mL-1。结果:在所有测试的工作表面上,在Ziehl-Neelsen染色盆上的RODAC板上发现了两个不同的菌落。这些菌落经MPT64抗原试验和抗酸杆菌的存在证实为结核分枝杆菌和非结核分枝杆菌。IS6110-qPCR在10个采样点检测到结核分枝杆菌DNA的存在,包括ZN染色盆、培养箱和显微镜区域。与RODAC相比,IS6110-qPCR检测到更多的工作表面污染。但值得注意的是,RODAC是一种基于培养的方法,检测到的是活菌,而PCR无法区分活菌和死菌。结论:RODAC平板的应用更适合于监测工作环境中活菌的污染情况,并告知适当的纠正措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Nutritional Index and Systemic Immune-inflammation Index: Possible New Parameters for COVID-19 Severity Pregnant Human Myometrial 1-41 Cell Viability Test on Vitamin D Administration Presence of Multidrug Resistance (MDR) Escherichia coli in the Citarum River located in Greater Bandung Area, Indonesia Penile Length of Prepubertal Children in Surabaya Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior in E-Cigar Users Community in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1