Economic Populism and Producerism: European Right-Wing Populist Parties in a Transatlantic Perspective

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Populism Pub Date : 2018-11-23 DOI:10.1163/25888072-02011022
G. Ivaldi, Oscar Mazzoleni
{"title":"Economic Populism and Producerism: European Right-Wing Populist Parties in a Transatlantic Perspective","authors":"G. Ivaldi, Oscar Mazzoleni","doi":"10.1163/25888072-02011022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article aims to develop a conceptual framework to address the economic dimension of right-wing populism. Moving beyond classic left-right economics and the divide between economic and cultural approaches, it argues that the political economy of right-wing populists is intertwined with cultural values in the construction of the ‘true’ people as an economic community whose well-being is in decline and under threat, and therefore needs to be restored. Looking at populist traditions across Europe and the United States, the paper emphasizes the significance of ‘producerist’ frames in economic populism. This is illustrated through an empirical analysis of differences and similarities in the economic policies and discourses of three established right-wing populist parties based in Europe (FN, SVP and UKIP), and the Tea Party and Donald Trump in the United States. We find that economic populist frames are common to all of the parties under scrutiny, albeit subject, however, to different interpretations of the producerist antagonism and groups. Our findings confirm that the intersection between economic populism and producerism provides a new—and fruitful—perspective on right-wing populism, while simultaneously demonstrating the relevance of a transatlantic approach to the study of the populist phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":29733,"journal":{"name":"Populism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/25888072-02011022","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Populism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-02011022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This article aims to develop a conceptual framework to address the economic dimension of right-wing populism. Moving beyond classic left-right economics and the divide between economic and cultural approaches, it argues that the political economy of right-wing populists is intertwined with cultural values in the construction of the ‘true’ people as an economic community whose well-being is in decline and under threat, and therefore needs to be restored. Looking at populist traditions across Europe and the United States, the paper emphasizes the significance of ‘producerist’ frames in economic populism. This is illustrated through an empirical analysis of differences and similarities in the economic policies and discourses of three established right-wing populist parties based in Europe (FN, SVP and UKIP), and the Tea Party and Donald Trump in the United States. We find that economic populist frames are common to all of the parties under scrutiny, albeit subject, however, to different interpretations of the producerist antagonism and groups. Our findings confirm that the intersection between economic populism and producerism provides a new—and fruitful—perspective on right-wing populism, while simultaneously demonstrating the relevance of a transatlantic approach to the study of the populist phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济民粹主义与生产主义:跨大西洋视角下的欧洲右翼民粹主义政党
本文旨在建立一个概念框架来解决右翼民粹主义的经济层面。它超越了经典的左右经济学以及经济和文化方法之间的分歧,认为右翼民粹主义者的政治经济与文化价值观交织在一起,将“真正的”人民建设成一个福祉正在下降和受到威胁的经济社区,因此需要恢复。纵观欧美的民粹主义传统,本文强调了“生产者主义”框架在经济民粹主义中的重要性。这可以通过对欧洲三个老牌右翼民粹主义政党(新军、高级副总统和英国独立党)以及美国茶党和唐纳德·特朗普的经济政策和话语的异同进行实证分析来说明。我们发现,经济民粹主义框架对所有受审查的政党来说都是常见的,尽管对生产者对立和群体有不同的解释。我们的研究结果证实,经济民粹主义和生产主义之间的交叉为右翼民粹主义提供了一个新的、富有成效的视角,同时也证明了跨大西洋方法对民粹主义现象研究的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Activities and Counterstrategies; Populism during the COVID-19 Pandemic Homegrown Hate: Why White Nationalists and Militant Islamists Are Waging War against the United States, written by Sara Kamali American Zealots: Inside Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism, written by Arie Perliger Empire of Resentment: Populism’s Toxic Embrace of Nationalism, written by Lawrence Rosenthal The Virus as Remedy: COVID-19 and the End of the Populist Meta-Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1