Quantifying the capacity for contemporary trait changes to drive intermittent predator–prey cycles

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Monographs Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1002/ecm.1505
Ellen van Velzen, Ursula Gaedke, Toni Klauschies
{"title":"Quantifying the capacity for contemporary trait changes to drive intermittent predator–prey cycles","authors":"Ellen van Velzen,&nbsp;Ursula Gaedke,&nbsp;Toni Klauschies","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A large and growing body of theory has demonstrated how the presence of trait variation in prey or predator populations may affect the amplitude and phase of predator–prey cycles. Less attention has been given to so-called intermittent cycles, in which predator–prey oscillations recurrently disappear and re-appear, despite such dynamics being observed in empirical systems and modeling studies. A comprehensive understanding of the conditions under which trait changes may drive intermittent predator–prey dynamics, as well as their potential ecological implications, is therefore missing. Here we provide a first systematic analysis of the eco-evolutionary conditions that may give rise to intermittent predator–prey cycles, investigating 16 models that incorporate different types of trait variation within prey, predators, or both. Our results show that intermittent dynamics often arise through predator–prey coevolution, but only very rarely when only one trophic level can adapt. Additionally, the frequency of intermittent cycles depends on the source of trait variation (genetic variation or phenotypic plasticity) and the genetic architecture (Mendelian or quantitative traits), with intermittency occurring most commonly through Mendelian evolution, and very rarely through phenotypic plasticity. Further analysis identified three necessary conditions for when trait variation can drive intermittent cycles. First, the intrinsic stability of the predator–prey system must depend on the traits of prey, predators, or both. Second, there must be a mechanism causing the recurrent alternation between stable and unstable states, leading to a “trait” cycle superimposed on the population dynamics. Finally, these trait dynamics must be significantly slower than the predator–prey cycles. We show how these conditions explain all the abovementioned patterns. We further show an important unexpected consequence of these necessary conditions: they are most easily met when intraspecific trait variation is at high risk of being lost. As trait diversity is positively associated with ecosystem functioning, this can have potentially severe negative consequences. This novel result highlights the importance of identifying and understanding intermittent cycles in theoretical studies and natural systems. The new approach for detecting and quantifying intermittency we develop here will be instrumental in enabling future study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.1505","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1505","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A large and growing body of theory has demonstrated how the presence of trait variation in prey or predator populations may affect the amplitude and phase of predator–prey cycles. Less attention has been given to so-called intermittent cycles, in which predator–prey oscillations recurrently disappear and re-appear, despite such dynamics being observed in empirical systems and modeling studies. A comprehensive understanding of the conditions under which trait changes may drive intermittent predator–prey dynamics, as well as their potential ecological implications, is therefore missing. Here we provide a first systematic analysis of the eco-evolutionary conditions that may give rise to intermittent predator–prey cycles, investigating 16 models that incorporate different types of trait variation within prey, predators, or both. Our results show that intermittent dynamics often arise through predator–prey coevolution, but only very rarely when only one trophic level can adapt. Additionally, the frequency of intermittent cycles depends on the source of trait variation (genetic variation or phenotypic plasticity) and the genetic architecture (Mendelian or quantitative traits), with intermittency occurring most commonly through Mendelian evolution, and very rarely through phenotypic plasticity. Further analysis identified three necessary conditions for when trait variation can drive intermittent cycles. First, the intrinsic stability of the predator–prey system must depend on the traits of prey, predators, or both. Second, there must be a mechanism causing the recurrent alternation between stable and unstable states, leading to a “trait” cycle superimposed on the population dynamics. Finally, these trait dynamics must be significantly slower than the predator–prey cycles. We show how these conditions explain all the abovementioned patterns. We further show an important unexpected consequence of these necessary conditions: they are most easily met when intraspecific trait variation is at high risk of being lost. As trait diversity is positively associated with ecosystem functioning, this can have potentially severe negative consequences. This novel result highlights the importance of identifying and understanding intermittent cycles in theoretical studies and natural systems. The new approach for detecting and quantifying intermittency we develop here will be instrumental in enabling future study.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化当代性状变化驱动间歇性捕食者-猎物循环的能力
越来越多的理论表明,猎物或捕食者群体中特征变异的存在如何影响捕食者-猎物周期的幅度和阶段。尽管在经验系统和建模研究中观察到这种动态,但人们对所谓的间歇性循环的关注较少,在间歇性循环中,捕食者-猎物振荡反复消失和重新出现。因此,缺乏对性状变化可能驱动间歇性捕食者-猎物动态的条件的全面理解,以及它们潜在的生态影响。本文首次对可能导致间歇性捕食者-猎物循环的生态进化条件进行了系统分析,研究了16种模型,这些模型包含了猎物、捕食者或两者之间不同类型的性状变异。我们的研究结果表明,间歇性动态经常出现在捕食者-猎物共同进化中,但只有一个营养水平可以适应时才很少出现。此外,间歇性循环的频率取决于性状变异的来源(遗传变异或表型可塑性)和遗传结构(孟德尔或数量性状),间歇性最常通过孟德尔进化发生,很少通过表型可塑性发生。进一步的分析确定了性状变异驱动间歇性循环的三个必要条件。首先,捕食者-猎物系统的内在稳定性必须取决于猎物、捕食者或两者的特征。其次,必须有一种机制导致稳定和不稳定状态之间的反复交替,从而导致叠加在种群动态上的“性状”周期。最后,这些性状的动态必须比捕食者-猎物周期慢得多。我们将展示这些条件如何解释上述所有模式。我们进一步展示了这些必要条件的一个重要的意想不到的结果:当种内性状变异处于丢失的高风险时,它们最容易满足。由于性状多样性与生态系统功能呈正相关,这可能会产生潜在的严重负面后果。这一新颖的结果突出了在理论研究和自然系统中识别和理解间歇性循环的重要性。我们在这里开发的检测和量化间歇性的新方法将有助于实现未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
期刊最新文献
An integrative paradigm for building causal knowledge Parasites disrupt a keystone mutualism that underpins the structure, functioning, and resilience of a coastal ecosystem Thermal biology diversity of bee pollinators: Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and plant community-level correlates The enigmatic life history of the bamboo explained as a strategy to arrest succession New theoretical and analytical framework for quantifying and classifying ecological niche differentiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1