Utterance-Initial Prosodic Differences Between Statements and Questions in Infant-Directed Speech.

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Child Language Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-26 DOI:10.1017/S0305000922000460
Susan Geffen, Kelly Burkinshaw, Angeliki Athanasopoulou, Suzanne Curtin
{"title":"Utterance-Initial Prosodic Differences Between Statements and Questions in Infant-Directed Speech.","authors":"Susan Geffen, Kelly Burkinshaw, Angeliki Athanasopoulou, Suzanne Curtin","doi":"10.1017/S0305000922000460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-linguistically, statements and questions broadly differ in syntactic organization. To learn the syntactic properties of each sentence type, learners might first rely on non-syntactic information. This paper analyzed prosodic differences between infant-directed <i>wh</i>-questions and statements to determine what kinds of cues might be available. We predicted there would be a significant difference depending on the first words that appear in <i>wh</i>-questions (e.g., two closed-class words; meaning words from a category that rarely changes) compared to the variety of first words found in statements. We measured F0, duration, and intensity of the first two words in statements and <i>wh</i>-questions in naturalistic speech from 13 mother-child dyads in the Brent corpus of the CHILDES database. Results found larger differences between sentence-types when the second word was an open-class not a closed-class word, suggesting a relationship between prosodic and syntactic information in an utterance-initial position that infants may use to make sentence-type distinctions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-linguistically, statements and questions broadly differ in syntactic organization. To learn the syntactic properties of each sentence type, learners might first rely on non-syntactic information. This paper analyzed prosodic differences between infant-directed wh-questions and statements to determine what kinds of cues might be available. We predicted there would be a significant difference depending on the first words that appear in wh-questions (e.g., two closed-class words; meaning words from a category that rarely changes) compared to the variety of first words found in statements. We measured F0, duration, and intensity of the first two words in statements and wh-questions in naturalistic speech from 13 mother-child dyads in the Brent corpus of the CHILDES database. Results found larger differences between sentence-types when the second word was an open-class not a closed-class word, suggesting a relationship between prosodic and syntactic information in an utterance-initial position that infants may use to make sentence-type distinctions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿指向性言语中陈述句和疑问句的初始韵律差异。
跨语言,陈述句和疑问句在句法组织上有很大的不同。为了学习每种句子类型的句法属性,学习者可能首先依赖于非句法信息。本文分析了婴儿指向的wh疑问句和陈述句之间的韵律差异,以确定哪些类型的线索可能可用。我们预测会有显著的差异,这取决于在wh-疑问句中出现的第一个单词(例如,两个封闭类单词;与在陈述中发现的各种各样的第一个单词相比,来自一个很少变化的类别的意思单词。我们从CHILDES数据库的Brent语料库中选取了13对母子,测量了自然主义语言中陈述句和疑问句前两个词的F0、持续时间和强度。结果发现,当第二个词是开放类词而不是封闭类词时,句子类型之间的差异更大,这表明婴儿可能会使用话语初始位置的韵律和句法信息之间的关系来区分句子类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
期刊最新文献
Living the first years in a pandemic: children's linguistic development and related factors in and out of the COVID-19 lockdowns. Referential transparency of verbs in child-directed input by Japanese and American caregivers Testing the relationship between preferences for infant-directed speech and vocabulary development: A multi-lab study. Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language Predictors of sentence recall performance in children with and without DLD: Complexity matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1