The Two Cultures: Statistics and Machine Learning in Science

R. Kass
{"title":"The Two Cultures: Statistics and Machine Learning in Science","authors":"R. Kass","doi":"10.1353/obs.2021.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his 2001 Statistical Science paper, Leo Breiman called attention to \"two cultures\" of data analysts, the first associated with computer science and the second with statistics. Breiman saw flaws in the traditionally-oriented statistical culture and advocated the predictively-oriented approach he identified with computer science. Although many of his observations were accurate and useful, Breiman failed to acknowledge the merits of statistical modeling, and he mischaracterized the role of statistics in science. To explain, I discuss machine learning and artificial intelligence; excessive cautiousness in statistics; dangers of statistical modeling; potential accomplishments of statistical modeling; the statistical paradigm; the nature of statistical models; and statistical methods that work well in practice. Everyone who is interested in the use of computer science and statistics in data analysis should grapple with the issues raised by Breiman's article.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:In his 2001 Statistical Science paper, Leo Breiman called attention to "two cultures" of data analysts, the first associated with computer science and the second with statistics. Breiman saw flaws in the traditionally-oriented statistical culture and advocated the predictively-oriented approach he identified with computer science. Although many of his observations were accurate and useful, Breiman failed to acknowledge the merits of statistical modeling, and he mischaracterized the role of statistics in science. To explain, I discuss machine learning and artificial intelligence; excessive cautiousness in statistics; dangers of statistical modeling; potential accomplishments of statistical modeling; the statistical paradigm; the nature of statistical models; and statistical methods that work well in practice. Everyone who is interested in the use of computer science and statistics in data analysis should grapple with the issues raised by Breiman's article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种文化:科学中的统计学和机器学习
摘要:Leo Breiman在其2001年的《统计科学》论文中呼吁关注数据分析师的“两种文化”,第一种与计算机科学有关,第二种与统计学有关。Breiman看到了传统的统计文化中的缺陷,并提倡他在计算机科学中认同的预测导向方法。尽管他的许多观察都是准确和有用的,但Breiman没有承认统计建模的优点,他错误地描述了统计在科学中的作用。为了解释,我讨论了机器学习和人工智能;统计工作过于谨慎;统计建模的危险性;统计建模的潜在成就;统计范式;统计模型的性质;以及在实践中行之有效的统计方法。每个对计算机科学和统计学在数据分析中的应用感兴趣的人都应该努力解决Breiman文章中提出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does matching introduce confounding or selection bias into the matched case-control design? Size-biased sensitivity analysis for matched pairs design to assess the impact of healthcare-associated infections A Software Tutorial for Matching in Clustered Observational Studies Using a difference-in-difference control trial to test an intervention aimed at increasing the take-up of a welfare payment in New Zealand Estimating Treatment Effect with Propensity Score Weighted Regression and Double Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1