Planning comprehensiveness and resource consumption in Chinese small enterprises

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Research Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-08 DOI:10.1108/arj-09-2021-0258
Robert Rickards, Rolf Ritsert
{"title":"Planning comprehensiveness and resource consumption in Chinese small enterprises","authors":"Robert Rickards, Rolf Ritsert","doi":"10.1108/arj-09-2021-0258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper explores the comprehensiveness of management accountants’ planning and the resource consumption associated with it in Chinese small enterprises (SEs).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe methodology involves correlation and regression analyses of online survey responses.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study findings are as follows: planning comprehensiveness and the resource consumption associated with it vary greatly across Chinese SEs; there is a trade-off between these two aspects of planning; and provision of linkages within and across plan types, employment of valuation analytics and the use of future-oriented techniques and tools, as well as joint venturing with a foreign partner explain roughly three-quarters of the observed differences in planning behavior.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nWith no readily accessible source to ensure random selection of the units of analysis, this study relies on a convenience sample. Participants’ survey responses may contain a residual element of key informant bias.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study uses primary data exclusively. It demonstrates a general trade-off between the comprehensiveness of management accountants’ planning and the associated resource consumption in Chinese SEs. Its novelty also derives from an approach that explains intercompany differences in the observed behavior via variables heretofore seldom used in empirical research.\n","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-09-2021-0258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper explores the comprehensiveness of management accountants’ planning and the resource consumption associated with it in Chinese small enterprises (SEs). Design/methodology/approach The methodology involves correlation and regression analyses of online survey responses. Findings The study findings are as follows: planning comprehensiveness and the resource consumption associated with it vary greatly across Chinese SEs; there is a trade-off between these two aspects of planning; and provision of linkages within and across plan types, employment of valuation analytics and the use of future-oriented techniques and tools, as well as joint venturing with a foreign partner explain roughly three-quarters of the observed differences in planning behavior. Research limitations/implications With no readily accessible source to ensure random selection of the units of analysis, this study relies on a convenience sample. Participants’ survey responses may contain a residual element of key informant bias. Originality/value This study uses primary data exclusively. It demonstrates a general trade-off between the comprehensiveness of management accountants’ planning and the associated resource consumption in Chinese SEs. Its novelty also derives from an approach that explains intercompany differences in the observed behavior via variables heretofore seldom used in empirical research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国小企业的规划综合性与资源消耗
目的探讨我国小企业管理会计师规划的全面性及其相关的资源消耗情况。设计/方法/方法该方法涉及对在线调查结果的相关和回归分析。研究发现:中国中小企业的规划综合程度及其相关资源消耗存在较大差异;在规划的这两个方面之间存在权衡;规划类型内部和之间的联系、评估分析的使用、面向未来的技术和工具的使用,以及与外国合作伙伴的合资经营,解释了所观察到的规划行为差异的大约四分之三。由于没有现成的来源来确保分析单位的随机选择,本研究依赖于一个方便的样本。参与者的调查回答可能包含关键信息提供者偏见的残余元素。原创性/价值本研究仅使用原始数据。它显示了中国企业管理会计师规划的全面性与相关资源消耗之间的一般权衡。它的新颖性还源于一种方法,该方法通过迄今很少在实证研究中使用的变量来解释所观察到的公司间行为差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The role of other comprehensive income in analyst valuation: profitability, perception and performance Does aural accounting improve the stakeholder relationship capability? Factors influencing readiness to implement digital audit among internal auditors of the Malaysian public sector Does a CEO from a reputable university create a better working environment? Evidence from Indonesia Determinants and impact of production planning and control accounting techniques on competitiveness of manufacturing companies: a structural equation modelling approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1