Court-initiated call for evidence in the Ukrainian economic process

A. Selivon, N. Nykytchenko, O. Oderii, O. Korotun, S. Podkopaev
{"title":"Court-initiated call for evidence in the Ukrainian economic process","authors":"A. Selivon, N. Nykytchenko, O. Oderii, O. Korotun, S. Podkopaev","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4177.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article was to study the actual problems of obtaining evidence on the initiative of the court in the economic process and, at the same time, to substantiate the proposals for reforming the economic procedural legislation of Ukraine. In the research process were used methods of general and special, namely: historical, comparative legal, synergistic, structural systemic, analysis and synthesis, logical and generalization method. It has been shown that evidence is an important part of the judicial process. It is emphasized that the role of the court in ensuring a prompt and thorough consideration of the case cannot be passive. It is concluded that the court, while maintaining objectivity and impartiality, must assist the participants in the trial in exercising their rights, prevent any kind of abuse and take measures to fulfil its judicial duties, as a condition of possibility for the maintenance of the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":40854,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Politicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Politicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article was to study the actual problems of obtaining evidence on the initiative of the court in the economic process and, at the same time, to substantiate the proposals for reforming the economic procedural legislation of Ukraine. In the research process were used methods of general and special, namely: historical, comparative legal, synergistic, structural systemic, analysis and synthesis, logical and generalization method. It has been shown that evidence is an important part of the judicial process. It is emphasized that the role of the court in ensuring a prompt and thorough consideration of the case cannot be passive. It is concluded that the court, while maintaining objectivity and impartiality, must assist the participants in the trial in exercising their rights, prevent any kind of abuse and take measures to fulfil its judicial duties, as a condition of possibility for the maintenance of the rule of law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法院要求提供乌克兰经济进程中的证据
这篇文章的目的是研究在经济进程中由法院主动获取证据的实际问题,同时证实改革乌克兰经济程序立法的建议。在研究过程中采用了一般和特殊的方法,即:历史法、比较法、协同法、结构系统法、分析综合法、逻辑概括法。事实证明,证据是司法程序的重要组成部分。有人强调,法院在确保迅速和彻底审议案件方面的作用不能是被动的。结论是,法院在保持客观性和公正性的同时,必须协助审判参与者行使其权利,防止任何形式的滥用,并采取措施履行其司法职责,这是维护法治的一个可能条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuestiones Politicas
Cuestiones Politicas POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
42.90%
发文量
154
期刊最新文献
Financial responsibility of the state: a comparative analysis of the European countries’ approaches in peacetime and wartime The system of political education as an institute for the professionalization of politics Recognition and normative reconstruction as a theory of justice in Axel Honneth Legislative Support Standards in the European Union in the Field of Building a System of Local Self-Government Features of the Functioning of the Legal System in the Context of Digitalization Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1