Using Eye Tracking to Study Information Selection and Use in Procedures

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1109/TPC.2022.3228021
Michael Meng
{"title":"Using Eye Tracking to Study Information Selection and Use in Procedures","authors":"Michael Meng","doi":"10.1109/TPC.2022.3228021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<bold>Background</b>\n: Procedures are an important part of instructional materials. To support practitioners in designing effective procedures, research is needed on how users select information from a procedure and put it to use. This study demonstrates how eye tracking can be used to inform such research. Eye tracking is used to study effects of adding pictures to procedures in a software tutorial on how users interact with procedures. \n<bold>Literature review:</b>\n Existing methods have led to important insights but face limitations. Eye tracking has the potential to overcome some of these limitations. However, research designs are needed that leave it to the user when to read and when to act. \n<bold>Research questions:</b>\n 1. Does adding pictures to procedures improve user performance and, if so, why? What can we learn from eye tracking about the mechanisms that bring about performance improvements? 2. How do users interact with procedures that they read “to do”? What can we learn from eye tracking about reading strategies that they spontaneously adopt? \n<bold>Methodology:</b>\n Eye movements were recorded from 42 participants as they worked through one of two versions of a tutorial: with or without pictures. \n<bold>Results:</b>\n Accuracy on tasks was higher when the procedures included pictures. Including pictures sped up processing the instructions and executing the actions, but did not trigger more attention switches between the procedures and the application that the users worked with. Users spontaneously adopted a strategy of immediate task execution and processed pictures before acting. \n<bold>Conclusions:</b>\n Pictures facilitate efficient processing of procedures, leaving more resources for task execution. Reading and acting are tightly connected in a complex pattern. Eye tracking will be of value to examine their interplay further and the ways that it can be influenced by design.","PeriodicalId":46950,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","volume":"66 1","pages":"7-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10025462/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Procedures are an important part of instructional materials. To support practitioners in designing effective procedures, research is needed on how users select information from a procedure and put it to use. This study demonstrates how eye tracking can be used to inform such research. Eye tracking is used to study effects of adding pictures to procedures in a software tutorial on how users interact with procedures. Literature review: Existing methods have led to important insights but face limitations. Eye tracking has the potential to overcome some of these limitations. However, research designs are needed that leave it to the user when to read and when to act. Research questions: 1. Does adding pictures to procedures improve user performance and, if so, why? What can we learn from eye tracking about the mechanisms that bring about performance improvements? 2. How do users interact with procedures that they read “to do”? What can we learn from eye tracking about reading strategies that they spontaneously adopt? Methodology: Eye movements were recorded from 42 participants as they worked through one of two versions of a tutorial: with or without pictures. Results: Accuracy on tasks was higher when the procedures included pictures. Including pictures sped up processing the instructions and executing the actions, but did not trigger more attention switches between the procedures and the application that the users worked with. Users spontaneously adopted a strategy of immediate task execution and processed pictures before acting. Conclusions: Pictures facilitate efficient processing of procedures, leaving more resources for task execution. Reading and acting are tightly connected in a complex pattern. Eye tracking will be of value to examine their interplay further and the ways that it can be influenced by design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用眼动追踪研究程序中的信息选择和使用
背景:程序是教学材料的重要组成部分。为了支持从业者设计有效的程序,需要研究用户如何从程序中选择信息并将其使用。这项研究证明了眼动追踪可以用来为这类研究提供信息。眼动追踪用于研究在软件教程中向程序添加图片对用户如何与程序交互的影响。文献综述:现有的方法已经产生了重要的见解,但面临局限性。眼动追踪技术有可能克服其中的一些限制。然而,研究设计需要留给用户什么时候阅读,什么时候行动。研究问题:1;向过程中添加图片是否提高了用户性能,如果是,为什么?我们能从眼动追踪中学到什么关于提高性能的机制?2. 用户如何与他们阅读“要做”的过程交互?我们能从眼动追踪中了解到他们自发采用的阅读策略吗?方法:记录了42名参与者的眼球运动,他们在两种版本的教程中学习:有或没有图片。结果:当程序包含图片时,任务的准确性更高。添加图片可以加快处理指令和执行操作的速度,但并没有在用户使用的程序和应用程序之间引发更多的注意力切换。用户自发采取立即执行任务的策略,在行动前处理图片。结论:图片有助于流程的高效处理,为任务的执行留下更多的资源。阅读和表演以一种复杂的模式紧密相连。眼动追踪对于进一步研究它们之间的相互作用以及受设计影响的方式是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to applied research on professional communication—including but not limited to technical and business communication. Papers should address the research interests and needs of technical communicators, engineers, scientists, information designers, editors, linguists, translators, managers, business professionals, and others from around the globe who practice, conduct research on, and teach others about effective professional communication. The Transactions publishes original, empirical research that addresses one of these contexts: The communication practices of technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists The practices of professional communicators who work in technical or business environments Evidence-based methods for teaching and practicing professional and technical communication.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Information for Authors Getting it Wrong: Student Estimations of Time and the Number of Drafts in Linked Computer Science and Technical Communication Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1