Conducting collaborative research across global North-South contexts: benefits, challenges and implications of working with visual and digital participatory research approaches

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI:10.1080/2159676X.2022.2048059
Mitchell McSweeney, Janet Otte, Patrick Eyul, L. Hayhurst, Donna Tara Parytci
{"title":"Conducting collaborative research across global North-South contexts: benefits, challenges and implications of working with visual and digital participatory research approaches","authors":"Mitchell McSweeney, Janet Otte, Patrick Eyul, L. Hayhurst, Donna Tara Parytci","doi":"10.1080/2159676X.2022.2048059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There are a variety of important methodological considerations for collaborations between global North researchers and local community-based researchers undertaking empirical investigation in the field of sport for development and peace (SDP) in the global South. To explore these, we outline the participatory action research methodology adopted in this study and the use of visual and digital methods to explore the use of bicycles to achieve international development goals – as part of what we call the ‘bicycles for development’ (BFD) movement – in Uganda. We describe (1) the preparation involved in such an approach; (2) the collaborative processes of visual and digital methods utilised for the research; and (3) key elements of our participatory approach, including mutual learning, understanding expectations of the international partnership, and interpreting the nuances involved in conducting cross-cultural research. We conclude the paper by discussing the methodological implications these three elements have for future SDP and BFD research and the importance of critically considering team-based, participatory action research.","PeriodicalId":48542,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"264 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2048059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT There are a variety of important methodological considerations for collaborations between global North researchers and local community-based researchers undertaking empirical investigation in the field of sport for development and peace (SDP) in the global South. To explore these, we outline the participatory action research methodology adopted in this study and the use of visual and digital methods to explore the use of bicycles to achieve international development goals – as part of what we call the ‘bicycles for development’ (BFD) movement – in Uganda. We describe (1) the preparation involved in such an approach; (2) the collaborative processes of visual and digital methods utilised for the research; and (3) key elements of our participatory approach, including mutual learning, understanding expectations of the international partnership, and interpreting the nuances involved in conducting cross-cultural research. We conclude the paper by discussing the methodological implications these three elements have for future SDP and BFD research and the importance of critically considering team-based, participatory action research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全球南北背景下开展合作研究:采用视觉和数字参与式研究方法的好处、挑战和影响
全球北方研究人员与当地社区研究人员在全球南方体育促进发展与和平(SDP)领域进行实证调查时,有各种重要的方法论考虑因素。为了探讨这些问题,我们概述了本研究中采用的参与性行动研究方法,以及使用视觉和数字方法来探索使用自行车实现国际发展目标-作为我们称之为“自行车促进发展”(BFD)运动的一部分-在乌干达。我们描述(1)这种方法所涉及的准备;(2)研究中使用的视觉和数字方法的协作过程;(3)我们参与式方法的关键要素,包括相互学习,理解国际伙伴关系的期望,以及解释进行跨文化研究所涉及的细微差别。我们通过讨论这三个要素对未来SDP和BFD研究的方法学意义以及批判性地考虑基于团队的参与性行动研究的重要性来结束本文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Stories of acceptance and resistance: illness identity construction in athletes (mis)diagnosed with a personality disorder ‘I’m not the police’: practical strategies for sport coach mentors to develop trust and trustworthiness Building bridges: a Qualitative exploration of the athlete – guide partnership in high-performance parasport You wouldn’t let your phone run out of battery: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of male professional football coaches’ well-being Whiteness, Canadian university athletic administration, and anti-racism leadership: ‘A bunch of white haired, white dudes in the back rooms’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1