Exploring the Impact of the First Wave of COVID-19 on Social Work Practice: A Qualitative Study in England, UK

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK British Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2021-08-17 DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcab166
T. Kingstone, P. Campbell, A. Andras, Kathryn D Nixon, Christian Mallen, L. Dikomitis, A. Andras, P. Campbell, L. Dikomitis, T. Helliwell, T. Kingstone, Christian Mallen, Kay Polidano, Michelle Robinson, Thomas Shepherd, Brianne Wenning
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of the First Wave of COVID-19 on Social Work Practice: A Qualitative Study in England, UK","authors":"T. Kingstone, P. Campbell, A. Andras, Kathryn D Nixon, Christian Mallen, L. Dikomitis, A. Andras, P. Campbell, L. Dikomitis, T. Helliwell, T. Kingstone, Christian Mallen, Kay Polidano, Michelle Robinson, Thomas Shepherd, Brianne Wenning","doi":"10.1093/bjsw/bcab166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The COVID-19 pandemic signalled a radical shift in health and social care services globally. In UK, many of the people with existing social care needs were identified as ‘clinically vulnerable’ to COVID-19. Those at greatest risk were encouraged to adhere to additional public health measures that inadvertently exacerbated social disadvantages. Social workers were challenged to ‘dig deep’ to continue to provide services as usual. However, problems implementing new ways of working were reported but not examined in-depth through research. Our study explored experiences and perceptions of social workers responding to the first wave (April–July 2020) of COVID-19, in England, UK. Interviews with thirteen social workers, all working in the West Midlands region, were conducted via telephone or online video. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. We use ‘managing uncertainty’ as a central concept underpinning the four themes identified after analysis: (1) providing social care at a physical distance, (2) negotiating home/work boundaries, (3) managing emerging risks and (4) long-term implications for social work. We discuss our findings in the context of resilience and organisational adaptation. Social workers in our study demonstrated resilience in action and rapid adaptation to new practices, but equally expressed concern about short-term efficiencies being prioritised over individual service user needs.","PeriodicalId":48259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Summary The COVID-19 pandemic signalled a radical shift in health and social care services globally. In UK, many of the people with existing social care needs were identified as ‘clinically vulnerable’ to COVID-19. Those at greatest risk were encouraged to adhere to additional public health measures that inadvertently exacerbated social disadvantages. Social workers were challenged to ‘dig deep’ to continue to provide services as usual. However, problems implementing new ways of working were reported but not examined in-depth through research. Our study explored experiences and perceptions of social workers responding to the first wave (April–July 2020) of COVID-19, in England, UK. Interviews with thirteen social workers, all working in the West Midlands region, were conducted via telephone or online video. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. We use ‘managing uncertainty’ as a central concept underpinning the four themes identified after analysis: (1) providing social care at a physical distance, (2) negotiating home/work boundaries, (3) managing emerging risks and (4) long-term implications for social work. We discuss our findings in the context of resilience and organisational adaptation. Social workers in our study demonstrated resilience in action and rapid adaptation to new practices, but equally expressed concern about short-term efficiencies being prioritised over individual service user needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索新冠肺炎第一波疫情对社会工作实践的影响:英国英格兰的定性研究
2019冠状病毒病大流行标志着全球卫生和社会保健服务的根本转变。在英国,许多有社会护理需求的人被确定为“临床上易受COVID-19感染”。鼓励那些风险最大的人坚持采取额外的公共卫生措施,这无意中加剧了社会劣势。社会工作者面临的挑战是“深入挖掘”,继续像往常一样提供服务。然而,报告了实施新工作方式的问题,但没有通过研究深入审查。我们的研究探讨了英国英格兰社会工作者应对第一波(2020年4月至7月)COVID-19的经验和看法。通过电话或在线视频采访了13名社会工作者,他们都在西米德兰兹地区工作。使用反身性主题分析对转录本进行分析。我们将“管理不确定性”作为分析后确定的四个主题的核心概念:(1)提供物理距离的社会护理;(2)协商家庭/工作边界;(3)管理新出现的风险;(4)对社会工作的长期影响。我们在弹性和组织适应的背景下讨论我们的发现。在我们的研究中,社会工作者表现出行动的弹性和对新做法的快速适应,但同样表达了对短期效率优先于个人服务用户需求的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
22.20%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Published for the British Association of Social Workers, this is the leading academic social work journal in the UK. It covers every aspect of social work, with papers reporting research, discussing practice, and examining principles and theories. It is read by social work educators, researchers, practitioners and managers who wish to keep up to date with theoretical and empirical developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Walking aid training as a clinical competence in Canadian entry-to-practice professional academic programs. Re-Envisioning Field Education in Australian Social Work to Combat Placement Poverty: Students’, Educators’ and Practitioners’ Perceptions Can Social Workers Estimate the Likelihood of Future Actions and Events? A Forecasting Accuracy Study Role of Peer Support in Building Motivation to Change Addictive Behaviour An A–Z of Social Work Theory (1st Editions), Malcom Payne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1