Religion and cognitive control: An event-coding approach

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101022
Bernhard Hommel
{"title":"Religion and cognitive control: An event-coding approach","authors":"Bernhard Hommel","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Religion is playing an important role in our lives, be it from a personal perspective as member of a particular congregation or as an agnostic living among believers. What impact has religion on our decision-making and action? Two kinds of impact have been considered: religious goals are likely to constrain and color our behavior, but religion may also strengthen cognitive control in a more generic sense. While evidence supports both considerations, it remains a mystery how that works, that is, which mechanisms underlie the impact of religion on our decisions and action control. Here I suggest a preliminary mechanistic model accounting for this impact. It is based on the Theory of Event Coding (TEC), a general theory of human perception, attention, and action control, and the assumptions that goals are represented in a distributed fashion (as selection criteria) and that their impact is moderated by metacontrol, the current control style that varies between persistence and flexibility. The model is parsimonious (i.e., not religion-specific) and mechanistically transparent, and thus provides a solid basis for more systematic experimentation and theorizing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Religion is playing an important role in our lives, be it from a personal perspective as member of a particular congregation or as an agnostic living among believers. What impact has religion on our decision-making and action? Two kinds of impact have been considered: religious goals are likely to constrain and color our behavior, but religion may also strengthen cognitive control in a more generic sense. While evidence supports both considerations, it remains a mystery how that works, that is, which mechanisms underlie the impact of religion on our decisions and action control. Here I suggest a preliminary mechanistic model accounting for this impact. It is based on the Theory of Event Coding (TEC), a general theory of human perception, attention, and action control, and the assumptions that goals are represented in a distributed fashion (as selection criteria) and that their impact is moderated by metacontrol, the current control style that varies between persistence and flexibility. The model is parsimonious (i.e., not religion-specific) and mechanistically transparent, and thus provides a solid basis for more systematic experimentation and theorizing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教与认知控制:一种事件编码方法
宗教在我们的生活中扮演着重要的角色,无论是作为一个特定教会成员的个人角度,还是作为一个生活在信徒中的不可知论者。宗教对我们的决策和行动有什么影响?研究人员考虑了两种影响:宗教目标可能会限制和影响我们的行为,但宗教也可能在更普遍的意义上加强认知控制。虽然证据支持这两种观点,但它是如何起作用的仍然是一个谜,也就是说,宗教对我们的决定和行动控制的影响的机制是什么。在这里,我提出一个初步的机制模型来解释这种影响。它基于事件编码理论(TEC),这是人类感知、注意力和行动控制的一般理论,并假设目标以分布式方式表示(作为选择标准),并且它们的影响由元控制来调节,元控制是当前的控制风格,在持久性和灵活性之间变化。该模型是简约的(即,不是特定于宗教的),并且在机制上是透明的,因此为更系统的实验和理论提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Psychiatrization in Czech lexical data: Everyday adjectives are acquiring clinical connotations Editorial Board What happens to representatives during family constellations? Attempts at explanation and comparison with other difficult-to-explain phenomena Re-enchanting mirror neurons through lexical changes Actions Speak Louder than outcomes leading to ineffective altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1