Delivering an inclusive built environment for physically disabled people in public universities (Jordan as a case study)

IF 2.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Design and Technology Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1108/jedt-06-2022-0281
A. Alhusban, Salwa N. Almshaqbeh
{"title":"Delivering an inclusive built environment for physically disabled people in public universities (Jordan as a case study)","authors":"A. Alhusban, Salwa N. Almshaqbeh","doi":"10.1108/jedt-06-2022-0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to determine the design factors that may affect the design of disabled students. Additionally, this study assesses and compares the reality between the public Jordanian universities’ built environment and international universities based on the Americans with Disabilities Act checklist – version 2.1 – to provide an accessible built environment for physically disabled people. Furthermore, this study examines the satisfaction degree of physically disabled people with the built environment in selected universities. Besides, this study examines the relationships/interrelationships between the students’ demographic factors, design factors and the degree of the disabled students’ satisfaction.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research used different data collection methods to answer the research questions: literature review, observation and questionnaire. Additionally, this study used different analytical and statistical methods, such as comparative analysis between the local cases and the selected international case study based on the Americans with Disabilities Act checklist, version 2.1, descriptive analysis and Pearson r correlational statistics.\n\n\nFindings\nThis research found that the Jordanian public universities did not apply all required design factors to achieve a high degree of the built environment of accessibility and provide all the requirements and needs of physically disabled students like international universities. Additionally, half of the physically disabled students respondents were satisfied with the availability and quality of pathways, ramps, doors and corridors, non-slippery materials, elevators, accessible entrances, entrances doors, methods of openings, adequate spaces for wheelchair students at the configuration of the entrance and the availability of railing. In contrast, they were unsatisfied with the availability of parking and bathrooms for each gender and signage systems. Moreover, this research found no significant differences between gender and educational level and all factors that may impact the students’ satisfaction with campus environmental design. Furthermore, this research found that there was a strong to very strong positive linear association and a significant correlation/intercorrelation between the availability and the design quality of parking, entrances, doors, lobbies and corridors, bathrooms, signage systems and information, ramps, elevators and stairs and the disabled students’ satisfaction degree.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research tends to help disabled students participate entirely and independently in the built environment and all aspects of society, involve them within the community and facilitate their access to universities’ urban space. This research considers guidelines and checklists for architects and policymakers to apply through all design and retrofitting processes to meet disabled students’ requirements. This research provides a vital understanding of the needs of disabled students in educational spaces to create a barrier-free campus environment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nInclusive design is a relatively new architectural concept. It provides means to ensure access and equal participation in the built environment, offers the opportunity to improve and design new equivalent solutions in architecture simultaneously and covers the way for a broad clarification of equality. Applying the concepts of inclusive design is a step toward eliminating the barriers imposed on the built environment in public universities and creating an accessible built environment. In addition, this research can guide future research in other institutions.\n","PeriodicalId":46533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-06-2022-0281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine the design factors that may affect the design of disabled students. Additionally, this study assesses and compares the reality between the public Jordanian universities’ built environment and international universities based on the Americans with Disabilities Act checklist – version 2.1 – to provide an accessible built environment for physically disabled people. Furthermore, this study examines the satisfaction degree of physically disabled people with the built environment in selected universities. Besides, this study examines the relationships/interrelationships between the students’ demographic factors, design factors and the degree of the disabled students’ satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach This research used different data collection methods to answer the research questions: literature review, observation and questionnaire. Additionally, this study used different analytical and statistical methods, such as comparative analysis between the local cases and the selected international case study based on the Americans with Disabilities Act checklist, version 2.1, descriptive analysis and Pearson r correlational statistics. Findings This research found that the Jordanian public universities did not apply all required design factors to achieve a high degree of the built environment of accessibility and provide all the requirements and needs of physically disabled students like international universities. Additionally, half of the physically disabled students respondents were satisfied with the availability and quality of pathways, ramps, doors and corridors, non-slippery materials, elevators, accessible entrances, entrances doors, methods of openings, adequate spaces for wheelchair students at the configuration of the entrance and the availability of railing. In contrast, they were unsatisfied with the availability of parking and bathrooms for each gender and signage systems. Moreover, this research found no significant differences between gender and educational level and all factors that may impact the students’ satisfaction with campus environmental design. Furthermore, this research found that there was a strong to very strong positive linear association and a significant correlation/intercorrelation between the availability and the design quality of parking, entrances, doors, lobbies and corridors, bathrooms, signage systems and information, ramps, elevators and stairs and the disabled students’ satisfaction degree. Practical implications This research tends to help disabled students participate entirely and independently in the built environment and all aspects of society, involve them within the community and facilitate their access to universities’ urban space. This research considers guidelines and checklists for architects and policymakers to apply through all design and retrofitting processes to meet disabled students’ requirements. This research provides a vital understanding of the needs of disabled students in educational spaces to create a barrier-free campus environment. Originality/value Inclusive design is a relatively new architectural concept. It provides means to ensure access and equal participation in the built environment, offers the opportunity to improve and design new equivalent solutions in architecture simultaneously and covers the way for a broad clarification of equality. Applying the concepts of inclusive design is a step toward eliminating the barriers imposed on the built environment in public universities and creating an accessible built environment. In addition, this research can guide future research in other institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在公立大学为身体残疾人士提供包容的建筑环境(以约旦为例研究)
目的本研究旨在确定可能影响残疾学生设计的设计因素。此外,本研究根据《美国残疾人法案》2.1版清单,评估并比较了约旦公立大学和国际大学的建筑环境,为身体残疾的人提供无障碍的建筑环境。此外,本研究还考察了部分大学肢体残疾人对建筑环境的满意度。此外,本研究还考察了学生的人口学因素、设计因素与残疾学生满意度之间的关系。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用不同的数据收集方法回答研究问题:文献综述、观察和问卷调查。此外,本研究使用了不同的分析和统计方法,如基于《美国残疾人法案》2.1版检查表的本地病例和选定的国际病例研究之间的比较分析、描述性分析和Pearson r相关统计。发现这项研究发现,约旦公立大学并没有像国际大学那样,应用所有必要的设计因素来实现高度的无障碍建筑环境,并提供身体残疾学生的所有要求和需求。此外,一半的身体残疾学生受访者对通道、坡道、门和走廊、防滑材料、电梯、无障碍入口、入口门、开口方法、入口配置处为轮椅学生提供的足够空间以及栏杆的可用性感到满意。相比之下,他们对每个性别的停车场和浴室以及标识系统的可用性感到不满。此外,本研究未发现性别、教育水平以及所有可能影响学生对校园环境设计满意度的因素之间存在显著差异。此外,本研究发现,停车场、入口、门、大堂和走廊、浴室、标识系统和信息、坡道、电梯和楼梯的可用性和设计质量与残疾学生的满意度之间存在强到非常强的正线性关联,并存在显著的相关性/相互关联。实践意义这项研究倾向于帮助残疾学生完全独立地参与建筑环境和社会的各个方面,让他们融入社区,并为他们进入大学的城市空间提供便利。这项研究考虑了建筑师和政策制定者在所有设计和改造过程中应用的指南和清单,以满足残疾学生的要求。这项研究为残疾学生在教育空间中创造无障碍校园环境的需求提供了重要的理解。创意/价值包容性设计是一个相对较新的建筑概念。它提供了确保进入和平等参与建筑环境的手段,提供了同时改进和设计建筑中新的等效解决方案的机会,并涵盖了广泛澄清平等的途径。应用包容性设计的概念是消除公立大学建筑环境障碍和创造无障碍建筑环境的一步。此外,这项研究可以指导其他机构未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: - Design strategies - Usability and adaptability - Material, component and systems performance - Process control - Alternative and new technologies - Organizational, management and research issues - Human factors - Environmental, quality and health and safety issues - Cost and life cycle issues - Sustainability criteria, indicators, measurement and practices - Risk management - Entrepreneurship Law, regulation and governance - Design, implementing, managing and practicing innovation - Visualization, simulation, information and communication technologies - Education practices, innovation, strategies and policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a framework for improving health and safety risk management at informal construction sites in Tanzania Impact of project risk allocation on PPP housing project delivery in Nigeria: partial least square structural equation modeling approach Ensemble of ensembles for fine particulate matter pollution prediction using big data analytics and IoT emission sensors Resource sustainability in the water, energy and food nexus: role of technological innovation Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of structural concrete containing RCA treated with sodium metasilicate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1