Perceptions and practices on antimicrobial use by the farmers of the Chikomba District, Zimbabwe

Anderson Munengwa, Chikumba Nation, Mugoti Alban
{"title":"Perceptions and practices on antimicrobial use by the farmers of the Chikomba District, Zimbabwe","authors":"Anderson Munengwa, Chikumba Nation, Mugoti Alban","doi":"10.13170/AJAS.5.2.16713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) on antimicrobial use (AMU) of livestock farmers are poorly understood in Zimbabwe despite their essence in combating the development of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of the study was to assess these patterns based on suggested KAP variables. A questionnaire-based survey of (n=60) Small Scale Commercial Farmers (SSCF), (n=60) Large Scale Commercial farmers (LSCF), and (n=60) resettled farmers (A1) was undertaken from January to March 2019. Participants were purposively selected from 10 wards based on willingness to participate in the study. Logistic regression, analysis of variance, and Pearson's correlation were performed in SAS (2003) version 6. Overall AMU practice scores were above 50% despite detecting violation of manufacturer's specifications. AMU was correlated with farmer's knowledge, r (178) = 0.42, p =0.000 and attitude, r (178) = 0.54, p =0.000. Farming scale, type of livestock kept and level of education influenced AMU (P 0.05). Farming scale influenced above 50% of the farmers to change label dosages, withdrawal periods, treatment frequencies, and consult friends on AMU. A similar pattern was noted on the effect of main livestock species kept on changing treatment frequencies and the use of human antibiotics. AMU without prescriptions increased with a decreasing level of education (P = 0.010). Knowledge on AMU was high for LSCF (average 58%), low for A1 (average 33%), and SSCF (average 46%). Attitudes were positive for LSCF (average 67%) and SSCF (average 57%) and negative for A1 (average 49%). We concluded that there is a serious violation of antimicrobial manufacturer's specifications by farmers in the Chikomba district which is associated with poor knowledge and attitudes on prudent ways of AMU","PeriodicalId":52680,"journal":{"name":"Aceh Journal of Animal Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aceh Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13170/AJAS.5.2.16713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) on antimicrobial use (AMU) of livestock farmers are poorly understood in Zimbabwe despite their essence in combating the development of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of the study was to assess these patterns based on suggested KAP variables. A questionnaire-based survey of (n=60) Small Scale Commercial Farmers (SSCF), (n=60) Large Scale Commercial farmers (LSCF), and (n=60) resettled farmers (A1) was undertaken from January to March 2019. Participants were purposively selected from 10 wards based on willingness to participate in the study. Logistic regression, analysis of variance, and Pearson's correlation were performed in SAS (2003) version 6. Overall AMU practice scores were above 50% despite detecting violation of manufacturer's specifications. AMU was correlated with farmer's knowledge, r (178) = 0.42, p =0.000 and attitude, r (178) = 0.54, p =0.000. Farming scale, type of livestock kept and level of education influenced AMU (P 0.05). Farming scale influenced above 50% of the farmers to change label dosages, withdrawal periods, treatment frequencies, and consult friends on AMU. A similar pattern was noted on the effect of main livestock species kept on changing treatment frequencies and the use of human antibiotics. AMU without prescriptions increased with a decreasing level of education (P = 0.010). Knowledge on AMU was high for LSCF (average 58%), low for A1 (average 33%), and SSCF (average 46%). Attitudes were positive for LSCF (average 67%) and SSCF (average 57%) and negative for A1 (average 49%). We concluded that there is a serious violation of antimicrobial manufacturer's specifications by farmers in the Chikomba district which is associated with poor knowledge and attitudes on prudent ways of AMU
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
津巴布韦Chikomba区农民对抗菌药物使用的认识和实践
津巴布韦对畜牧业农民使用抗菌药物的知识、态度和做法(KAP)知之甚少,尽管它们在对抗抗菌药物耐药性方面具有重要意义。该研究的目的是根据建议的KAP变量来评估这些模式。2019年1月至3月,对(n=60)小规模商业农民(SSCF)、(n=60。根据参与研究的意愿,有目的地从10个病房中选择参与者。在SAS(2003)第6版中进行了Logistic回归、方差分析和Pearson相关分析。尽管发现了违反制造商规范的行为,AMU的总体实践得分仍超过50%。AMU与农民知识水平相关,r(178)=0.42,p=0.000;与态度相关,r(178)=0.054,p=0.000。养殖规模、饲养的牲畜类型和受教育程度影响AMU(P 0.05)。养殖规模影响50%以上的农民改变标签剂量、停药期、治疗频率和咨询AMU朋友。在饲养的主要牲畜物种对不断变化的治疗频率和人类抗生素使用的影响方面,也注意到了类似的模式。无处方AMU随受教育程度的降低而增加(P=0.010)。LSCF对AMU的了解程度较高(平均58%),A1(平均33%)和SSCF(平均46%)。对LSCF(平均67%)和SSCF(平均57%)持积极态度,对A1(平均49%)持消极态度。我们得出的结论是,Chikomba地区的农民严重违反了抗菌药物制造商的规范,这与他们对AMU谨慎方式的知识和态度不足有关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short communication: Length-frequency distribution, length-weight relationship and condition factor of two grey mullets from Lagos Lagoon Fiber and ash content of fermented palm oil fronds using liquid organic supplements as potential feed ingredients for ruminant Effect of Water Hyacinth Leaf Flour (Eichhornia crassipes) Fermented by Aspergillus niger on the Growth, Survival Rate and Blood Profile of Sangkuriang Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Diet modulates host health through gut microbiota derived extracellular vesicles: A short review Growth dimension and DNA analysis of Bulinus snail from River Wudil, Kano State Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1