В «образе Другого»: буряты в русской массовой литературе XXI в.

Q2 Arts and Humanities Mongolovedenie Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-82-94
Sesegma G. Zhambalova, Marina Ts. Tsyrenova
{"title":"В «образе Другого»: буряты в русской массовой литературе XXI в.","authors":"Sesegma G. Zhambalova, Marina Ts. Tsyrenova","doi":"10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-82-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Contemporary Russian popular literature shows a trend to depict non-Russian citizens as minor and negative characters, the malign features proper being often somewhat attributed to race and ethnicity. Goals. The study provides an insight into the image of Buryats in Russian popular literature of the twenty first century, since some of the identified narratives can artificially ignite xenophobia in Russian society. Materials and methods. The article examines a variety of literary and research material, published field data collected by S. Zhambalova and N. Igaue, online sources. The employed methods comprise those of historical imagology and theory of stigmatization. Results. The considered detective novel (Taxi for an Angel) by V. Platova depicts four Buryats and one German as ‘othered’ — secondary and negative characters. Body-related portrayals are adversely supplemented with elements of Buryat mythology, religion, and ethnography. As for the work by I. Stogoff, he articulates therein some negative impressions of his stay in Buryatia. And both the literary compositions are abundant in critical accounts of Buddhism, Buddhists, and Ivolginsky Datsan. Discussion. The examined narratives are distinguished by xenophobia towards Buryats and basically contradict the state of the art, Russia’s Constitution, current nationalities policies of the Government, and may threaten interethnic relations. The bulk of Buryats are Russian citizens successfully integrated into global contexts, and the negative public stigmatization of one indigenous people attests to rudiments of the post-Soviet self-stigmatization of Russia are still there. Conclusions. Both the books are products of early twenty-first-century literature characterized by identity crisis — and bear traces of nationalism and ethnocentrism. Images of the Other attributed to Buryats are toll opinion-based, questionable, and falsify the actual present-day interethnic agenda in Russia. Like other indigenous communities, Buryats are civilized members of the contemporary world, while the manifested stigmas may adversely influence intra-nation harmony. Such publications and nation-wide self-stigmatization in Russian popular literature are definitely inadmissible.","PeriodicalId":33928,"journal":{"name":"Mongolovedenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mongolovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-82-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Contemporary Russian popular literature shows a trend to depict non-Russian citizens as minor and negative characters, the malign features proper being often somewhat attributed to race and ethnicity. Goals. The study provides an insight into the image of Buryats in Russian popular literature of the twenty first century, since some of the identified narratives can artificially ignite xenophobia in Russian society. Materials and methods. The article examines a variety of literary and research material, published field data collected by S. Zhambalova and N. Igaue, online sources. The employed methods comprise those of historical imagology and theory of stigmatization. Results. The considered detective novel (Taxi for an Angel) by V. Platova depicts four Buryats and one German as ‘othered’ — secondary and negative characters. Body-related portrayals are adversely supplemented with elements of Buryat mythology, religion, and ethnography. As for the work by I. Stogoff, he articulates therein some negative impressions of his stay in Buryatia. And both the literary compositions are abundant in critical accounts of Buddhism, Buddhists, and Ivolginsky Datsan. Discussion. The examined narratives are distinguished by xenophobia towards Buryats and basically contradict the state of the art, Russia’s Constitution, current nationalities policies of the Government, and may threaten interethnic relations. The bulk of Buryats are Russian citizens successfully integrated into global contexts, and the negative public stigmatization of one indigenous people attests to rudiments of the post-Soviet self-stigmatization of Russia are still there. Conclusions. Both the books are products of early twenty-first-century literature characterized by identity crisis — and bear traces of nationalism and ethnocentrism. Images of the Other attributed to Buryats are toll opinion-based, questionable, and falsify the actual present-day interethnic agenda in Russia. Like other indigenous communities, Buryats are civilized members of the contemporary world, while the manifested stigmas may adversely influence intra-nation harmony. Such publications and nation-wide self-stigmatization in Russian popular literature are definitely inadmissible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在“另一个人的形象”:布里亚特在俄罗斯大众文学21世纪。
介绍当代俄罗斯通俗文学呈现出一种将非俄罗斯公民描绘成次要和消极人物的趋势,这种恶毒的特征通常在某种程度上归因于种族和民族。目标。这项研究深入了解了21世纪俄罗斯通俗文学中布里亚特人的形象,因为一些公认的叙事可能会人为地点燃俄罗斯社会中的仇外心理。材料和方法。这篇文章考察了各种文学和研究材料,包括S.Zhambalova和N.Igaue收集的已发表的现场数据,这些数据都是在线来源。所采用的方法包括历史意象学和污名化理论。后果V.Platova的侦探小说(《天使的出租车》)将四名布里亚特人和一名德国人描绘成“另类”——次要和消极的角色。与身体相关的刻画被布里亚特神话、宗教和民族志的元素所不利地补充。至于I·斯托戈夫的作品,他在其中阐述了他在布里亚特逗留期间的一些负面印象。这两部文学作品都有大量对佛教、佛教徒和伊沃尔金斯基·达桑的批评。讨论所审查的叙述以对布里亚特人的仇外心理为特征,基本上与最新技术、俄罗斯宪法、政府当前的民族政策相矛盾,并可能威胁到民族间关系。大多数布里亚特人是成功融入全球环境的俄罗斯公民,对一个土著人的负面公开污名化证明了后苏联时期对俄罗斯的自我污名化仍然存在。结论。这两本书都是以身份危机为特征的21世纪初文学的产物,带有民族主义和种族中心主义的痕迹。布里亚特人的“他者”形象是基于收费意见的,值得怀疑,并伪造了俄罗斯当前的实际种族间议程。与其他土著社区一样,布里亚特人是当代世界的文明成员,而明显的污名可能会对民族内部的和谐产生不利影响。俄罗斯通俗文学中的这种出版物和全国性的自我污名化是绝对不可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mongolovedenie
Mongolovedenie Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
О текстах Манджушри из Научного архива Калмыцкого научного центра РАН (по материалам коллекции Э. Б. Убушиева) Е. А. Стулов в Монголии и для Монголии «Калмыки ныне с Крымом в твердом миру…». Калмыцко-крымские отношения в конце XVII в. Несколько замечаний о монгольских переводах с тибетского языка Калмыцкая знать в начале ХХ в.: нойон Церен-Давид Цанджинович Тундутов
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1