Predicting High Confidence Errors in Eyewitness Memory: The Role of Face Recognition Ability, Decision-Time, and Justifications

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.02.002
Jesse H. Grabman, David G. Dobolyi, Nathan L. Berelovich, Chad S. Dodson
{"title":"Predicting High Confidence Errors in Eyewitness Memory: The Role of Face Recognition Ability, Decision-Time, and Justifications","authors":"Jesse H. Grabman,&nbsp;David G. Dobolyi,&nbsp;Nathan L. Berelovich,&nbsp;Chad S. Dodson","doi":"10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing research shows that high eyewitness confidence at the time of an initial identification is a strong predictor of accuracy (<span>Wixted &amp; Wells, 2017</span>). However, as with all forms of criminal evidence, this relationship is imperfect. This study addresses whether there are variables that systematically influence the rate of high confidence misidentifications. Notably, this is the first study to document the influence of face recognition ability on the confidence–accuracy relationship. Participants viewed photos of individuals of their same race or a different race and performed a lineup recognition test after either a 5-min (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->277) or 1-day (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->292) delay. High confidence identification errors were more likely when (a) individuals are worse face recognizers, (b) decision-times are slow, and (c) responses are justified with references to familiarity (e.g., “He looks familiar”).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 233-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.02.002","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211368118302328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Increasing research shows that high eyewitness confidence at the time of an initial identification is a strong predictor of accuracy (Wixted & Wells, 2017). However, as with all forms of criminal evidence, this relationship is imperfect. This study addresses whether there are variables that systematically influence the rate of high confidence misidentifications. Notably, this is the first study to document the influence of face recognition ability on the confidence–accuracy relationship. Participants viewed photos of individuals of their same race or a different race and performed a lineup recognition test after either a 5-min (n = 277) or 1-day (n = 292) delay. High confidence identification errors were more likely when (a) individuals are worse face recognizers, (b) decision-times are slow, and (c) responses are justified with references to familiarity (e.g., “He looks familiar”).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测目击者记忆中的高置信度错误:人脸识别能力、决策时间和理由的作用
越来越多的研究表明,在初步鉴定时,目击者的高度自信是准确性的一个强有力的预测因素(Wixted &威尔斯,2017)。然而,与所有形式的刑事证据一样,这种关系并不完美。本研究探讨是否有变量系统性地影响高置信度误认率。值得注意的是,这是第一个记录人脸识别能力对置信度-准确性关系影响的研究。参与者观看同一种族或不同种族的人的照片,并在延迟5分钟(n = 277)或1天(n = 292)后进行阵容识别测试。当(a)个体的面部识别能力较差,(b)决策时间较慢,以及(c)反应与熟悉程度有关(例如,“他看起来很熟悉”)时,高置信度识别错误更有可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
119
期刊最新文献
Den mørke side af semantisk kontekst [the dark side of semantic context]: Semantic context boosts people’s confidence in their ability to comprehend Danish. Supplemental Material for Wordless Wisdom: The Dominant Role of Tacit Knowledge in True and Fake News Discrimination Was he the perpetrator or a bystander? Testing theories of unconscious transference for eyewitness identification. Remembering the Malvinas/Falklands War: National, generational, and ideological differences. Perspective matters: When visual perspective reshapes autobiographical memories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1