Evaluating a visual communications tool to explore risk and safety with nurses and patients within an intellectual disability forensic service: A pilot study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Pub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI:10.3109/13668250.2022.2106697
Samuel Quinn, S. Rhynas, S. Gowland, L. Cameron, Nicola Braid, A. Holloway, S. O'Connor
{"title":"Evaluating a visual communications tool to explore risk and safety with nurses and patients within an intellectual disability forensic service: A pilot study","authors":"Samuel Quinn, S. Rhynas, S. Gowland, L. Cameron, Nicola Braid, A. Holloway, S. O'Connor","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2022.2106697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Issues of risk and safety can be challenging to discuss with forensic patients with an intellectual disability. Talking Mats is a visual communication tool that facilitates therapeutic conversations. Method A pilot study, adopting an ethnographic approach, was used to evaluate Talking Mats. Interviews and video observations were conducted with nurses and forensic patients with an intellectual disability from two forensic wards in Scotland. Results Exploratory evidence suggests that Talking Mats offers a non-biased platform to discuss potentially emotive issues around risk, safety, and wellbeing. Pre-existing notions of Talking Mats, staff availability, and the context of COVID-19 acted as barriers to adopting the visual communications tool. Conclusion There is value in further research regarding communication tools to facilitate input on care planning and risk management for patients with an intellectual disability.","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2022.2106697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Issues of risk and safety can be challenging to discuss with forensic patients with an intellectual disability. Talking Mats is a visual communication tool that facilitates therapeutic conversations. Method A pilot study, adopting an ethnographic approach, was used to evaluate Talking Mats. Interviews and video observations were conducted with nurses and forensic patients with an intellectual disability from two forensic wards in Scotland. Results Exploratory evidence suggests that Talking Mats offers a non-biased platform to discuss potentially emotive issues around risk, safety, and wellbeing. Pre-existing notions of Talking Mats, staff availability, and the context of COVID-19 acted as barriers to adopting the visual communications tool. Conclusion There is value in further research regarding communication tools to facilitate input on care planning and risk management for patients with an intellectual disability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一种视觉沟通工具,以探索智力残疾法医服务中护士和患者的风险和安全性:一项试点研究
背景:与智力残疾的法医患者讨论风险和安全问题是具有挑战性的。谈话垫是一个视觉交流工具,促进治疗对话。方法采用民族志方法进行初步研究,对说话垫进行评价。对来自苏格兰两个法医病房的护士和智力残疾法医患者进行了访谈和视频观察。探索性证据表明,“说话垫”提供了一个无偏见的平台,可以讨论有关风险、安全和健康的潜在情感问题。现有的谈话垫概念、工作人员可用性和COVID-19背景是采用视觉通信工具的障碍。结论沟通工具在智障患者的护理规划和风险管理中具有重要的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Family members use superficial justice information to evaluate performance of sheltered workshops: A warning about “cognitive shortcuts” The uniquely relational role of nurses during the closure of large residential institutions for people with intellectual disability in Australia: A qualitative study Relatives’ experiences of quality of healthcare services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in Sweden Interdisciplinarity and self-injury: Toward an inclusive research and treatment paradigm Reducing the risks of maltreatment of older adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Development of a research-based intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1