Framing middle power foreign policy: trade, security, and human rights frames in Canadian and Australian foreign policy attitudes

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Pub Date : 2020-10-17 DOI:10.1093/irap/lcaa014
Timothy B. Gravelle
{"title":"Framing middle power foreign policy: trade, security, and human rights frames in Canadian and Australian foreign policy attitudes","authors":"Timothy B. Gravelle","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcaa014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Middle power states in the Indo-Pacific region face a challenging foreign policy environment in light of geopolitical and economic rivalry between the United States and China. In this context, what factors shape the foreign policy attitudes of middle power publics? This article presents results from a set of survey-based experiments conducted in Canada and Australia, two archetypal middle power states located on the Pacific Rim. Demographically representative samples of both publics were presented with randomized vignettes highlighting facets of bilateral relations with the United States, regional partners (Mexico in the Canadian case, and Indonesia in the Australian case), and China. Results indicate that making different aspects of a particular relationship salient as part of the vignette shapes perceptions of and preferences toward relations with the state in question. Foreign policy attitudes are thus amenable to framing effects. Still, results point to different frames having greater relevance to different bilateral relationships.","PeriodicalId":51799,"journal":{"name":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/irap/lcaa014","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcaa014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Middle power states in the Indo-Pacific region face a challenging foreign policy environment in light of geopolitical and economic rivalry between the United States and China. In this context, what factors shape the foreign policy attitudes of middle power publics? This article presents results from a set of survey-based experiments conducted in Canada and Australia, two archetypal middle power states located on the Pacific Rim. Demographically representative samples of both publics were presented with randomized vignettes highlighting facets of bilateral relations with the United States, regional partners (Mexico in the Canadian case, and Indonesia in the Australian case), and China. Results indicate that making different aspects of a particular relationship salient as part of the vignette shapes perceptions of and preferences toward relations with the state in question. Foreign policy attitudes are thus amenable to framing effects. Still, results point to different frames having greater relevance to different bilateral relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定中等强国外交政策:加拿大和澳大利亚外交政策态度中的贸易、安全和人权框架
鉴于中美之间的地缘政治和经济竞争,印太地区的中等强国面临着具有挑战性的外交政策环境。在这种背景下,是什么因素塑造了中等大国公众的外交政策态度?本文介绍了在加拿大和澳大利亚进行的一组基于调查的实验的结果,这两个典型的中等强国位于环太平洋地区。在人口统计学上具有代表性的两国公众样本中,随机展示了与美国、地区伙伴(加拿大为墨西哥,澳大利亚为印度尼西亚)和中国的双边关系的各个方面。结果表明,将特定关系的不同方面突出作为小插曲的一部分,可以塑造对有关国家关系的看法和偏好。因此,外交政策态度容易受到框架效应的影响。尽管如此,研究结果表明,不同的框架对不同的双边关系具有更大的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: International Relations of the Asia-Pacific is an exciting journal that addresses the major issues and developments taking place in the Asia-Pacific. It provides frontier knowledge of and fresh insights into the Asia-Pacific. The journal is a meeting place where various issues are debated from refreshingly diverging angles, backed up by rigorous scholarship. The journal is open to all methodological approaches and schools of thought, and to ideas that are expressed in plain and clear language.
期刊最新文献
Financial cooperation in the Asia-Pacific as regime complex: explaining patterns of coverage, membership, and rules Taking ideas and words seriously: explaining the institutionalization of the Lancang-Mekong cooperation Practicing Peace: Conflict Management in Southeast Asia and South America The CPTPP, cross-strait tensions, and Taiwan’s recognition for survival strategy under the democratic progressive party Migration governance in East and Southeast Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1