COMPARISON OF STRENGTH AND DURABILITY OF CONCRETES MADE WITH SULFATE-RESISTANT PORTLAND CEMENT AND PORTLAND CEMENT WITH POZZOLANA ADDITIVE

S. Kroviakov, Ukraine Architecture, M. Zavoloka, L. Dudnik, V. Kryzhanovskyi
{"title":"COMPARISON OF STRENGTH AND DURABILITY OF CONCRETES MADE WITH SULFATE-RESISTANT PORTLAND CEMENT AND PORTLAND CEMENT WITH POZZOLANA ADDITIVE","authors":"S. Kroviakov, Ukraine Architecture, M. Zavoloka, L. Dudnik, V. Kryzhanovskyi","doi":"10.13167/2019.19.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a comparison of the strength and durability of concrete with sulfate-resistant cement and cement with pozzolana additive was performed. In assessing the concrete durability, three indicators were compared: sulfate resistance, water permeability, and frost resistance. All concrete mixtures were used without admixtures. The absence of chemical admixtures in the concrete mixtures was because of the need to compare properly the properties of concretes with different cements without the influence of modifiers, which may result in different efficiencies for different types of binders. The concrete compositions of grades C20/25 and C30/35 were presented. The use of Portland cement with pozzolana additive in concrete mixtures provided the necessary level of corrosion resistance and frost resistance of concrete, as well as higher water permeability and lower cement content in comparison with using sulfate-resistant Portland cement.","PeriodicalId":53887,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS","volume":"1 1","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13167/2019.19.8","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13167/2019.19.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this study, a comparison of the strength and durability of concrete with sulfate-resistant cement and cement with pozzolana additive was performed. In assessing the concrete durability, three indicators were compared: sulfate resistance, water permeability, and frost resistance. All concrete mixtures were used without admixtures. The absence of chemical admixtures in the concrete mixtures was because of the need to compare properly the properties of concretes with different cements without the influence of modifiers, which may result in different efficiencies for different types of binders. The concrete compositions of grades C20/25 and C30/35 were presented. The use of Portland cement with pozzolana additive in concrete mixtures provided the necessary level of corrosion resistance and frost resistance of concrete, as well as higher water permeability and lower cement content in comparison with using sulfate-resistant Portland cement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗硫酸盐硅酸盐水泥与添加火山灰拉纳硅酸盐水泥混凝土强度和耐久性的比较
在本研究中,对抗硫酸盐水泥和火山灰添加剂水泥的混凝土强度和耐久性进行了比较。在评估混凝土耐久性时,比较了三个指标:抗硫酸盐性、透水性和抗冻性。使用的所有混凝土混合物都没有掺合料。混凝土混合物中没有化学外加剂是因为需要在不受改性剂影响的情况下,适当比较不同水泥的混凝土性能,这可能会导致不同类型的粘合剂的效率不同。介绍了C20/25和C30/35级混凝土的组成。与使用抗硫酸盐硅酸盐水泥相比,在混凝土混合物中使用含有火山灰添加剂的硅酸盐水泥提供了必要水平的混凝土耐腐蚀性和抗冻性,以及更高的透水性和更低的水泥含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in the Achievements of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy Students Buckling of Concrete Panels under biaxial compression according to Rheological-Dynamical Theory Analysis of the effects of land consolidation.<br> Case study: Šašinci Interaction Surfaces for Post-Fire Analysis Based on Minkowski Sum NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF FLUSHING TIME IN SMALL MARINAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1