Measurement Properties of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale in an Australian Allied Health Student Cohort

Brett Vaughan
{"title":"Measurement Properties of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale in an Australian Allied Health Student Cohort","authors":"Brett Vaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.hpe.2018.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Measurement of interprofessional practice perceptions of students is commonplace in the health professions education literature. There are a range of questionnaires available for researchers to use however the psychometric properties of these vary substantially. The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) has been widely used and multiple researchers have published alternative factor structures. The present study sought to build on this work by evaluating the psychometric properties of the IEPS using Rasch analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three-hundred and nineteen students in two Australian osteopathy programs completed the IEPS as part of a larger project into interprofessional education. The measurement properties of the questionnaire were evaluated using Rasch analysis and reliability estimations were also generated for the IEPS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fit to the Rasch model was achieved by modifying the original 18 item scale, however this was not unidimensional. Subsequent analysis using an alternative factor structure from the literature achieved Rasch model fit and was unidimensional. The final model produced an eight item version of the IEPS (IEPS8) with appropriate psychometric properties, including the ability to create a valid total score.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The questionnaire developed as a result of the Rasch analysis provides researchers with a short, psychometrically sound measure of perceptions of their own profession and how their profession works with others. The results also provide an opportunity to explore perceptions pre-post intervention IPE interventions using an interval-scale measure compared to an ordinal one. Researchers are encouraged to utilise this version of the IEPS in future research as it has the potential to be able to discriminate between levels of perception of their own profession and how their profession works with others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93562,"journal":{"name":"Health professions education","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 275-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.07.005","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health professions education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245230111830107X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose

Measurement of interprofessional practice perceptions of students is commonplace in the health professions education literature. There are a range of questionnaires available for researchers to use however the psychometric properties of these vary substantially. The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) has been widely used and multiple researchers have published alternative factor structures. The present study sought to build on this work by evaluating the psychometric properties of the IEPS using Rasch analysis.

Method

Three-hundred and nineteen students in two Australian osteopathy programs completed the IEPS as part of a larger project into interprofessional education. The measurement properties of the questionnaire were evaluated using Rasch analysis and reliability estimations were also generated for the IEPS.

Results

Fit to the Rasch model was achieved by modifying the original 18 item scale, however this was not unidimensional. Subsequent analysis using an alternative factor structure from the literature achieved Rasch model fit and was unidimensional. The final model produced an eight item version of the IEPS (IEPS8) with appropriate psychometric properties, including the ability to create a valid total score.

Discussion

The questionnaire developed as a result of the Rasch analysis provides researchers with a short, psychometrically sound measure of perceptions of their own profession and how their profession works with others. The results also provide an opportunity to explore perceptions pre-post intervention IPE interventions using an interval-scale measure compared to an ordinal one. Researchers are encouraged to utilise this version of the IEPS in future research as it has the potential to be able to discriminate between levels of perception of their own profession and how their profession works with others.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚联合健康学生跨学科教育感知量表的测量特性
目的在卫生专业教育文献中,测量学生的跨专业实践知觉是很常见的。有一系列问卷可供研究人员使用,但这些问卷的心理测量特性差异很大。跨学科教育感知量表(IEPS)得到了广泛的应用,许多研究者发表了替代因素结构。本研究试图通过使用Rasch分析评估IEPS的心理测量特性来建立这项工作。方法澳大利亚两个骨科项目的319名学生完成了IEPS,这是跨专业教育大项目的一部分。采用Rasch分析对问卷的测量属性进行了评价,并对IEPS进行了信度估计。结果通过修改原始的18项量表,达到了与Rasch模型的拟合,但这并不是一维的。随后的分析使用替代因素结构从文献中获得了拉希模型拟合,是单维的。最终的模型产生了一个八项版本的IEPS (IEPS8),具有适当的心理测量属性,包括创建有效总分的能力。讨论根据Rasch的分析开发的问卷为研究人员提供了一个简短的、心理测量学上合理的衡量他们对自己职业的看法以及他们的职业是如何与他人合作的。研究结果还提供了一个机会来探索干预前后的认知,使用间隔尺度测量与顺序测量相比,IPE干预。研究人员被鼓励在未来的研究中使用这个版本的IEPS,因为它有可能能够区分对自己职业的感知水平和他们的职业如何与他人合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Learning Harmony: Medical Student Reflections on the Intersection of the Arts & Humanities and Medicine, A Mixed Methods Study. Faculty Perceptions of Health Professional Students' Hybrid-Online Learning Strategies: A Multi-Center Qualitative Study The Effect of Online Learning on Students' Practical Assessment Results During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period Classroom Versus Online Team-based Learning: Effects on Students’ Learning and Performance Students’ Perceptions and Insights Towards Online Learning During Covid-19 Crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1