Effect of storage container on the bacteriological quality of water from different sources

Osuji Malachy Ikeokwu
{"title":"Effect of storage container on the bacteriological quality of water from different sources","authors":"Osuji Malachy Ikeokwu","doi":"10.15406/JMEN.2021.09.00323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research work was carried out to measure the effect of storage container on the bacterial population of water from different sources over a long storage time. Spread plate and other bacteriological techniques were adopted using Nutrient (NA), Salmonella/ Shigella(SSA), MacConkey(MAC), and Thiosulphite citrate bile sucrose (TCBS) agar. Calabash, Glass, Metal and Plastic containers were used to store rain, river, and tap water samples. Sample analysis was taken at time interval of week 0, 1, 3, 5, and 14. In rainwater stored in calabash, total heterotrophic bioload decreased from 9.2 logcfu/ml at week 0 to 5.3 log cfu/ml at week 5 and steady thereafter. Other bioloads in rain water stored in other containers showed similar trend in growth pattern. For river water stored in calabash container, total heterotrophic bioload decreased all through. For river water stored in glass container, it also decreased from 7.0 logcfu/ml at week 0 to 5.8 logcfu/ml at week 1 and was steady thereafter. Other bioloads in river water stored in other containers decreased from week 0 to week 14 at various concentrations. In tap water stored in glass and other containers, all decreased throughout. Several other factors were discovered in this research work to be responsible for the bioload population decrease observed. They include toxins produced during stationary phase as secondary metabolites, acids, nutrient depletion, pH variation, temperature changes. On the statistical analysis (ANOVA), it showed that the containers have significant effect on the bioload of the stored water after 14 weeks storage as plastic recorded the highest bioload change. To this effect people are advised to use plastic container for water storage for a long period. Also people are to filter the water to remove biofilms formed and debris of bacteria that died due to toxins produced. Nutrient depletion and effect of other factors contributed in bacterial population decrease.","PeriodicalId":91326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiology & experimentation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiology & experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JMEN.2021.09.00323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research work was carried out to measure the effect of storage container on the bacterial population of water from different sources over a long storage time. Spread plate and other bacteriological techniques were adopted using Nutrient (NA), Salmonella/ Shigella(SSA), MacConkey(MAC), and Thiosulphite citrate bile sucrose (TCBS) agar. Calabash, Glass, Metal and Plastic containers were used to store rain, river, and tap water samples. Sample analysis was taken at time interval of week 0, 1, 3, 5, and 14. In rainwater stored in calabash, total heterotrophic bioload decreased from 9.2 logcfu/ml at week 0 to 5.3 log cfu/ml at week 5 and steady thereafter. Other bioloads in rain water stored in other containers showed similar trend in growth pattern. For river water stored in calabash container, total heterotrophic bioload decreased all through. For river water stored in glass container, it also decreased from 7.0 logcfu/ml at week 0 to 5.8 logcfu/ml at week 1 and was steady thereafter. Other bioloads in river water stored in other containers decreased from week 0 to week 14 at various concentrations. In tap water stored in glass and other containers, all decreased throughout. Several other factors were discovered in this research work to be responsible for the bioload population decrease observed. They include toxins produced during stationary phase as secondary metabolites, acids, nutrient depletion, pH variation, temperature changes. On the statistical analysis (ANOVA), it showed that the containers have significant effect on the bioload of the stored water after 14 weeks storage as plastic recorded the highest bioload change. To this effect people are advised to use plastic container for water storage for a long period. Also people are to filter the water to remove biofilms formed and debris of bacteria that died due to toxins produced. Nutrient depletion and effect of other factors contributed in bacterial population decrease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
储存容器对不同水源水质的影响
本研究是为了测量不同来源的水在长时间的储存容器对细菌数量的影响。采用营养物(NA)、沙门氏菌/志贺氏菌(SSA)、麦康基(MAC)和柠檬酸硫亚硫酸盐胆糖(TCBS)琼脂,采用涂布平板等细菌学技术。葫芦、玻璃、金属和塑料容器被用来储存雨水、河水和自来水样本。在第0、1、3、5、14周的时间间隔进行样本分析。在葫芦储雨水中,总异养生物负荷从第0周的9.2 logcfu/ml下降到第5周的5.3 logcfu/ml,此后趋于稳定。其他容器储存的雨水中其他生物负荷也呈现出类似的生长趋势。对于储存在葫芦容器中的河水,总异养生物负荷始终下降。在玻璃容器中储存的河水也从第0周的7.0 logcfu/ml下降到第1周的5.8 logcfu/ml,此后趋于稳定。从第0周到第14周,储存在其他容器中的河水中其他生物负荷在不同浓度下均有所下降。在储存在玻璃和其他容器中的自来水中,所有这些都减少了。在这项研究工作中,还发现了其他几个因素,导致所观察到的生物负荷种群减少。它们包括在固定阶段产生的毒素作为次级代谢物,酸,养分消耗,pH值变化,温度变化。统计分析(ANOVA)表明,容器对储存14周后的水的生物负荷有显著影响,其中塑料的生物负荷变化最大。为此,建议人们使用塑料容器长期储存水。人们也要过滤水,去除形成的生物膜和因毒素产生而死亡的细菌碎片。养分消耗和其他因素的影响是导致细菌数量减少的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Loss of control of the pandemic during vaccination in Uruguay Nodular periorbital dirofilariasis in a child in Romania: case report Acinetobacter baumannii, a global health-threatening bacterium: a short review Pandemic parameters: history revisited Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among a healthy suburban population: genotypic diversity and frequency of pathogenicity genes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1