A Primer on the "Bell Case Synthesis Method" and a Lesson on Adult Child's Play

Angela A. Allen-Bell
{"title":"A Primer on the \"Bell Case Synthesis Method\" and a Lesson on Adult Child's Play","authors":"Angela A. Allen-Bell","doi":"10.6092/issn.2531-6133/7234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to successfully discern and communicate the relevant aspects of a judicial  opinion  is  a  fundamental  skill  that  legal  professionals  must  have.  Despite  its importance,  many  in  the  legal  arena  lack  the  ability  to  effectively  demonstrate  this skill.  Needless to say, law students suffer from this same shortcoming.  After years of reading inadequate briefs submitted by lawyers and reviewing deficient submissions by law  students,  I  developed  an  original  case  synthesis  method.  This  method,  titled  the “Bell Case Synthesis Method,” teaches one how to select supporting cases and how to adequately explain the relevant aspects of selected cases. This original method has been tested for years and has proven to be quite valuable for memo and brief writing, as well as for the higher level thinking that is needed for success in law school and the practice of  law.  This  article  will  benefit  a  broad  audience,  including  lawyers,  law  students, paralegals,  law  clerks,  inmate  counsel  and  legal  educators.  In  addition,  it  is  timely, given the recent emphasis on producing practice-ready law school graduates.","PeriodicalId":36563,"journal":{"name":"University of Bologna Law Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"68-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Bologna Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2531-6133/7234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to successfully discern and communicate the relevant aspects of a judicial  opinion  is  a  fundamental  skill  that  legal  professionals  must  have.  Despite  its importance,  many  in  the  legal  arena  lack  the  ability  to  effectively  demonstrate  this skill.  Needless to say, law students suffer from this same shortcoming.  After years of reading inadequate briefs submitted by lawyers and reviewing deficient submissions by law  students,  I  developed  an  original  case  synthesis  method.  This  method,  titled  the “Bell Case Synthesis Method,” teaches one how to select supporting cases and how to adequately explain the relevant aspects of selected cases. This original method has been tested for years and has proven to be quite valuable for memo and brief writing, as well as for the higher level thinking that is needed for success in law school and the practice of  law.  This  article  will  benefit  a  broad  audience,  including  lawyers,  law  students, paralegals,  law  clerks,  inmate  counsel  and  legal  educators.  In  addition,  it  is  timely, given the recent emphasis on producing practice-ready law school graduates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“钟形案例综合法”入门及成人儿童游戏教程
成功地辨别和传达司法意见的有关方面的能力是法律专业人员必须具备的一项基本技能。尽管它很重要,但法律领域的许多人缺乏有效展示这一技能的能力。不用说,法律系学生也有同样的缺点。经过多年阅读律师提交的不充分的摘要和审查法学院学生提交的不充分的摘要,我开发了一种独创的案例综合方法。这种方法被称为“贝尔案例综合法”,它教会人们如何选择支持案例,以及如何充分解释所选案例的相关方面。这种原始的方法已经经过多年的测试,并被证明对备忘录和简短的写作非常有价值,以及在法学院和法律实践中取得成功所需的更高层次的思考。本文将使广大读者受益,包括律师、法律系学生、律师助理、法律助理、囚犯顾问和法律教育者。此外,考虑到最近强调培养具备实践能力的法学院毕业生,这也是及时的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
University of Bologna Law Review
University of Bologna Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Securitizing Notes of Small Businesses and Needy Workers The Price of Transitional Justice: A Cost‐Benefit Analysis of its Mechanisms in Post‐Revolution Phase Is a Requirement to Wear a Mask Economically Valid During COVID-19? Constituting Over Constitutions Challenging the Undesired Outcome of FIOST Clauses on Cargo Interests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1