Docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized phase II study

Nilupai Abudureheiyimu , Yun Wu , Qing Li , Pin Zhang , Fei Ma , Peng Yuan , Yang Luo , Ying Fan , Shanshan Chen , Ruigang Cai , Qiao Li , Yiqun Han , Hangcheng Xu , Yan Wang , Jiayu Wang , Binghe Xu
{"title":"Docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized phase II study","authors":"Nilupai Abudureheiyimu ,&nbsp;Yun Wu ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Pin Zhang ,&nbsp;Fei Ma ,&nbsp;Peng Yuan ,&nbsp;Yang Luo ,&nbsp;Ying Fan ,&nbsp;Shanshan Chen ,&nbsp;Ruigang Cai ,&nbsp;Qiao Li ,&nbsp;Yiqun Han ,&nbsp;Hangcheng Xu ,&nbsp;Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Jiayu Wang ,&nbsp;Binghe Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/S-1 (TS) compared with docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) as a first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly divided into the TS group (n = 54) and the TX group (n = 57) for first-line chemotherapy from August 2015 to April 2019 (ClinicalTrials.org registration no. NCT02947061). Following the completion of combination therapy, patients without progression received S-1 or capecitabine maintenance treatment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 111 enrolled patients, the median PFS did not differ significantly between the TS group and the TX group (TS vs. TX, 9.0 vs. 7.4 months, <em>P</em> = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50–1.11, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75). There was also no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the two groups (TS vs. TX, 40.2 vs. 41.3 months, <em>P</em> = 0.976). In addition, visceral metastasis and metastasis sites, such as the liver or lung, did not lead to a significant effect on PFS and OS. The two regimens showed no significant difference in adverse events, except hand-foot syndrome, which predominated in the TX group (38.6% vs. 7.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.001), and diarrhea (24.1% vs. 3.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.003) and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (14.8% vs. 3.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.049), which were more frequent in the TS group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The TS and TX regimens demonstrated similar efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. The TS regimen had fewer cases of severe hand-foot syndrome than the TX regimen, representing an effective alternative option to the TX regimen. Further studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety of this strategy in real-world settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/S-1 (TS) compared with docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) as a first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly divided into the TS group (n = 54) and the TX group (n = 57) for first-line chemotherapy from August 2015 to April 2019 (ClinicalTrials.org registration no. NCT02947061). Following the completion of combination therapy, patients without progression received S-1 or capecitabine maintenance treatment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Among 111 enrolled patients, the median PFS did not differ significantly between the TS group and the TX group (TS vs. TX, 9.0 vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50–1.11, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75). There was also no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the two groups (TS vs. TX, 40.2 vs. 41.3 months, P = 0.976). In addition, visceral metastasis and metastasis sites, such as the liver or lung, did not lead to a significant effect on PFS and OS. The two regimens showed no significant difference in adverse events, except hand-foot syndrome, which predominated in the TX group (38.6% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.001), and diarrhea (24.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.003) and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (14.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.049), which were more frequent in the TS group.

Conclusions

The TS and TX regimens demonstrated similar efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. The TS regimen had fewer cases of severe hand-foot syndrome than the TX regimen, representing an effective alternative option to the TX regimen. Further studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety of this strategy in real-world settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多西他赛加S-1与多西他塞加卡培他滨作为晚期癌症患者一线治疗的前瞻性随机II期研究
本研究旨在评价多西他赛/S-1 (TS)与多西他赛/卡培他滨(TX)作为一线治疗晚期乳腺癌的疗效和安全性。方法于2015年8月至2019年4月,将晚期转移性乳腺癌患者随机分为TS组(n = 54)和TX组(n = 57)进行一线化疗(ClinicalTrials.org注册号:NCT02947061)。联合治疗完成后,无进展的患者接受S-1或卡培他滨维持治疗。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。结果在111例入组患者中,TS组和TX组的中位PFS无显著差异(TS vs TX, 9.0 vs 7.4个月,P = 0.365, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.50-1.11,风险比[HR]: 0.75)。两组患者的中位总生存期(OS)差异无统计学意义(TS vs TX, 40.2 vs 41.3个月,P = 0.976)。此外,内脏转移和转移部位,如肝脏或肺,对PFS和OS没有显著影响。两种方案在不良事件方面无显著差异,但TX组以手足综合征为主(38.6% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.001), TS组以腹泻(24.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.003)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)/丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平升高(14.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.049)更为常见。结论TS和TX方案在一线治疗晚期乳腺癌的疗效和安全性相似。TS方案比TX方案有更少的严重手足综合征病例,代表了TX方案的有效替代方案。需要进一步的研究来确定这种策略在现实环境中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment and triage strategy of cervical cancer primary screening on HPV integration status: 5-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study. Osteoimmunology in bone malignancies: a symphony with evil. Disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow as predictive classifiers for small cell lung cancer patients. Editorial Board TDERS, an exosome RNA-derived signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in clear cell renal cell cancer: a multicohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1