Analysis of Mulan’s Poor Reception in China from the Perspective of Orientalism

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES African and Asian Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-24 DOI:10.1163/15692108-12341570
Zhao Tong
{"title":"Analysis of Mulan’s Poor Reception in China from the Perspective of Orientalism","authors":"Zhao Tong","doi":"10.1163/15692108-12341570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The undesirable reception of Disney’s Mulan (2020) is attributable to complicated factors. This paper combs Hua Mulan’s images in Chinese literary and visual discourses, and confirms her as a virtuous epitome and a national heroine in Chinese mainstream culture, whereas in Mulan, she is portrayed as a warrior with magic “qi” and homosexual orientation, representing modern feminists’ pursuits for gender recognition and equality. Besides, the assertive collage of Chinese cultural elements severely impairs the authenticity of her story. Superficially, the arbitrary appropriation of Chinese culture causes the poor reception of the movie, which, however, if situated within the framework of Orientalism with a lineal examination of the Chinese-culture-related Hollywood movies, more underlying causes, ideological, political and commercial, can be uncovered. The film’s failure bespeaks the predicament confronted by contemporary Hollywood film industry. If Hollywood film producers want to reap lucrative gains from the booming Chinese film market, they should rectify their outdated condescending attitudes and do more in updating their production concepts, innovation, empathy and cooperation. This paper may be of significance as a reference to the practice and study of film adaptation, production and marketing across cultures.","PeriodicalId":54087,"journal":{"name":"African and Asian Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African and Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The undesirable reception of Disney’s Mulan (2020) is attributable to complicated factors. This paper combs Hua Mulan’s images in Chinese literary and visual discourses, and confirms her as a virtuous epitome and a national heroine in Chinese mainstream culture, whereas in Mulan, she is portrayed as a warrior with magic “qi” and homosexual orientation, representing modern feminists’ pursuits for gender recognition and equality. Besides, the assertive collage of Chinese cultural elements severely impairs the authenticity of her story. Superficially, the arbitrary appropriation of Chinese culture causes the poor reception of the movie, which, however, if situated within the framework of Orientalism with a lineal examination of the Chinese-culture-related Hollywood movies, more underlying causes, ideological, political and commercial, can be uncovered. The film’s failure bespeaks the predicament confronted by contemporary Hollywood film industry. If Hollywood film producers want to reap lucrative gains from the booming Chinese film market, they should rectify their outdated condescending attitudes and do more in updating their production concepts, innovation, empathy and cooperation. This paper may be of significance as a reference to the practice and study of film adaptation, production and marketing across cultures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从东方主义角度分析穆兰在中国的不良接受
迪士尼的《花木兰》(2020)反响不佳是由复杂的因素造成的。本文梳理了花木兰在中国文学和视觉话语中的形象,确认了她在中国主流文化中是一个道德的缩影和民族女英雄,而在《花木兰》中,她被塑造成一个有着神奇“气”和同性恋取向的战士,代表了现代女权主义者对性别认同和平等的追求。此外,自信的中国文化元素拼贴严重削弱了她的故事的真实性。从表面上看,对中国文化的随意挪用导致了电影的反响不佳,但如果将其置于东方主义的框架内,直接审视与中国文化相关的好莱坞电影,则可以发现更多的潜在原因,包括意识形态、政治和商业。这部电影的失败凸显了当代好莱坞电影业所面临的困境。如果好莱坞电影制片人想从蓬勃发展的中国电影市场中获得利润,他们应该纠正过时的屈尊俯就态度,在更新制作理念、创新、同理心和合作方面做得更多。本文对跨文化电影改编、制作和营销的实践和研究具有一定的借鉴意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The journal presents a scholarly account of studies of individuals and societies in Africa and Asia. Its scope is to publish original research by social scientists in the area of anthropology, sociology, history, political science and related social sciences about African and Asian societies and cultures and their relationships. The journal focuses on problems and possibilities, past and future. Where possible, comparisons are made between countries and continents. Articles should be based on original research and can be co-authored.
期刊最新文献
Ghana: A Political and Social History, written by Jeffrey S. Ahlman Humor in Pedagogy in Tertiary Education in the Age of Covid-19: Bosnia in Comparative Perspective, written by Philip C. Aka and Sencer Yeralan Congo’s Dancers: Women and Work in Kinshasa, written by Lesley Nicole Braun Navigating Womanhood in Contemporary Botswana, written by Stephanie S. Starling Integration in The Southern African Development Community Region: People’s Agency, Popular Participation, and Democratization, edited by Korwa Gombe Adar, Dorothy Mpabanga, Kebapetse Lotshwao, Thekiso Molokwane, and Norbert Musekiwa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1