{"title":"Assessment of microleakage and interfacial adaptation following simultaneous activation technique in primary molars","authors":"Heer Kadhi, Jasmin Winnier, Ishani Ratnaparkhi","doi":"10.1016/j.pdj.2022.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Simultaneous Activation Technique is a newer method of co-curing resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and self-etch adhesive.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Assessment of microleakage and interfacial adaptation following simultaneous activation technique in primary molars.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Standardized Class I cavities were prepared in 66 non-carious primary molars and randomly allocated to Group I – Simultaneous activation of RMGI and self-etch adhesive (SAT); Group II – SAT with enamel etching (SAT + EE); Group III – Conventional Sandwich Technique (ST) and restored with bulk fill composite. Time taken was calculated using stopwatch. Microleakage was assessed using dye penetration method under stereomicroscope. Seven samples per group were sent for Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis. One-Way Analysis of Variance and Post- Hoc Tukey's test were applied at P < 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean microleakage of group I, II and III were 1.23, 1.41 and 1.59 respectively. Time taken was least for SAT followed by SAT + EE and ST group. Statistically significant difference was seen between SAT and ST group (p < 0.0001) and SAT + EE and ST group (p < 0.0001). SEM analysis showed better mean interfacial adaptation in SAT + EE (1.00) followed by ST (2.14) and SAT (3.57) group. Difference between SAT + EE and SAT group was significant (p = 0.005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Simultaneous activation technique with selective enamel etching resulted in less microleakage and better interfacial adaptation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19977,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dental Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239422000453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Simultaneous Activation Technique is a newer method of co-curing resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and self-etch adhesive.
Aim
Assessment of microleakage and interfacial adaptation following simultaneous activation technique in primary molars.
Design
Standardized Class I cavities were prepared in 66 non-carious primary molars and randomly allocated to Group I – Simultaneous activation of RMGI and self-etch adhesive (SAT); Group II – SAT with enamel etching (SAT + EE); Group III – Conventional Sandwich Technique (ST) and restored with bulk fill composite. Time taken was calculated using stopwatch. Microleakage was assessed using dye penetration method under stereomicroscope. Seven samples per group were sent for Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis. One-Way Analysis of Variance and Post- Hoc Tukey's test were applied at P < 0.05.
Results
Mean microleakage of group I, II and III were 1.23, 1.41 and 1.59 respectively. Time taken was least for SAT followed by SAT + EE and ST group. Statistically significant difference was seen between SAT and ST group (p < 0.0001) and SAT + EE and ST group (p < 0.0001). SEM analysis showed better mean interfacial adaptation in SAT + EE (1.00) followed by ST (2.14) and SAT (3.57) group. Difference between SAT + EE and SAT group was significant (p = 0.005).
Conclusion
Simultaneous activation technique with selective enamel etching resulted in less microleakage and better interfacial adaptation.