Is redistributive policy of EU welfare state effective in tackling income inequality? A panel data analysis

Equilibrium Pub Date : 2022-03-27 DOI:10.24136/eq.2022.004
Anna Wildowicz-Szumarska
{"title":"Is redistributive policy of EU welfare state effective in tackling income inequality? A panel data analysis","authors":"Anna Wildowicz-Szumarska","doi":"10.24136/eq.2022.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research background: Income inequality has risen sharply since the 1990s, despite the increase in the average size of redistribution in countries representing different welfare state models. The problem of increasing income inequality is currently a challenge for the EU economies, not only with well-established liberal traditions, but also with conservative and social-democratic ones. Therefore, it is worth conducting research on the redistributive effects of fiscal policy.\nPurpose of the article: The article aims to show the redistributive effects of fiscal policy, paying particular attention to the most characteristic trends in redistribution, which are responsible for the growing income inequality. An overview of the fiscal instruments ? mainly personal income tax and benefit systems ? along with an empirical research on their potential impact on income inequality, allows for conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of redistributive policy in the EU countries.\nMethods: Both descriptive analysis and panel data analysis is implemented to examine the effectiveness of redistributive policy in tackling income inequality in the EU?28 countries in years 2005?2017.\nFindings & value added: Based on the panel analysis, it has been found that social transfers were much more effective than direct taxes in combating income inequality. In addition, the largest increase in income inequality ? as previously assumed ? was observed in the liberal welfare states, while the smallest in the social democratic welfare states. The empirical analysis extends the existing knowledge on main weaknesses of fiscal welfare state, indicating the required changes that may improve both its equity and efficiency.","PeriodicalId":84667,"journal":{"name":"Equilibrium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equilibrium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Research background: Income inequality has risen sharply since the 1990s, despite the increase in the average size of redistribution in countries representing different welfare state models. The problem of increasing income inequality is currently a challenge for the EU economies, not only with well-established liberal traditions, but also with conservative and social-democratic ones. Therefore, it is worth conducting research on the redistributive effects of fiscal policy. Purpose of the article: The article aims to show the redistributive effects of fiscal policy, paying particular attention to the most characteristic trends in redistribution, which are responsible for the growing income inequality. An overview of the fiscal instruments ? mainly personal income tax and benefit systems ? along with an empirical research on their potential impact on income inequality, allows for conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of redistributive policy in the EU countries. Methods: Both descriptive analysis and panel data analysis is implemented to examine the effectiveness of redistributive policy in tackling income inequality in the EU?28 countries in years 2005?2017. Findings & value added: Based on the panel analysis, it has been found that social transfers were much more effective than direct taxes in combating income inequality. In addition, the largest increase in income inequality ? as previously assumed ? was observed in the liberal welfare states, while the smallest in the social democratic welfare states. The empirical analysis extends the existing knowledge on main weaknesses of fiscal welfare state, indicating the required changes that may improve both its equity and efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟福利国家的再分配政策能否有效解决收入不平等问题?面板数据分析
研究背景:自20世纪90年代以来,尽管代表不同福利国家模式的国家的平均再分配规模有所增加,但收入不平等现象急剧加剧。收入不平等加剧的问题目前对欧盟经济体来说是一个挑战,不仅有着根深蒂固的自由主义传统,也有着保守和社会民主的传统。因此,研究财政政策的再分配效应是值得的。文章目的:文章旨在展示财政政策的再分配效应,特别关注再分配中最具特征的趋势,这些趋势是造成收入不平等加剧的原因。财政工具概述?主要是个人所得税和福利制度?再加上对其对收入不平等的潜在影响的实证研究,可以得出关于欧盟国家再分配政策有效性的结论。方法:采用描述性分析和面板数据分析来检验再分配政策在解决欧盟收入不平等问题方面的有效性?2005年有28个国家?2017年。调查结果和增值:根据小组分析,在消除收入不平等方面,社会转移比直接税更有效。此外,收入不平等的最大增幅是什么?如前所述?在自由福利国家中观察到,而在社会民主福利国家中最小。实证分析扩展了关于财政福利国家主要弱点的现有知识,表明了可能提高其公平性和效率的必要变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of bequest taxation on savings and transfers Barriers to immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis of the Asian immigrant entrepreneurs in Germany employing the DEMATEL approach Google and Apple mobility data as predictors for European tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic: A neural network approach The impact of organizational resilience on the quality of public services: Application of structural equation modeling Relationships between road transport indicators and expenditure of visitors in the context of European countries' tourism competitiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1