Japanese Modernity from the Siberian Silo

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/kri.2023.a904390
E. Pulford
{"title":"Japanese Modernity from the Siberian Silo","authors":"E. Pulford","doi":"10.1353/kri.2023.a904390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea that there are pairs of countries whose identities and geopolitical standings have emerged in dialogue with one another is an appealing one. Be it England and France, Brazil and Argentina, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, or numerous other examples including Russia and China (covered in my own work), various dyads of counterpart, rival, or partner nations appear to have had outsized influence on one another’s sense of place in the world, and only sometimes because of footballing grudges. Among such examples, Russia and Japan seem a decidedly odd couple in the international arena. Anthropologists or social historians would struggle to identify two more different places at the level of culture, politics, or society: aside from having unrelated linguistic and religious traditions, one state promotes a self-image based on continental vastness—a trait the current Russian president has doubled down on by invading Ukraine— while the other, at least today, is identified with the insular particularism of the “island nation” (shimaguni). At a more granular level, each society also approaches institutionalization and formality very differently, something illustrated by the tumultuous recent history of the Sakhalin–Hokkaido passenger ferry, suspended since 2018 amid repeated clashes between incompatible bureaucracies.","PeriodicalId":45639,"journal":{"name":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2023.a904390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The idea that there are pairs of countries whose identities and geopolitical standings have emerged in dialogue with one another is an appealing one. Be it England and France, Brazil and Argentina, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, or numerous other examples including Russia and China (covered in my own work), various dyads of counterpart, rival, or partner nations appear to have had outsized influence on one another’s sense of place in the world, and only sometimes because of footballing grudges. Among such examples, Russia and Japan seem a decidedly odd couple in the international arena. Anthropologists or social historians would struggle to identify two more different places at the level of culture, politics, or society: aside from having unrelated linguistic and religious traditions, one state promotes a self-image based on continental vastness—a trait the current Russian president has doubled down on by invading Ukraine— while the other, at least today, is identified with the insular particularism of the “island nation” (shimaguni). At a more granular level, each society also approaches institutionalization and formality very differently, something illustrated by the tumultuous recent history of the Sakhalin–Hokkaido passenger ferry, suspended since 2018 amid repeated clashes between incompatible bureaucracies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从西伯利亚筒仓看日本的现代性
有些国家的身份和地缘政治地位是在彼此的对话中显现出来的,这种想法很有吸引力。无论是英格兰和法国、巴西和阿根廷、埃及和沙特阿拉伯,还是包括俄罗斯和中国在内的众多其他例子(在我自己的著作中有涉及),不同的对手、竞争对手或伙伴国家似乎对彼此在世界上的地位感产生了巨大的影响,只是有时是因为足球方面的怨恨。在这样的例子中,俄罗斯和日本在国际舞台上显然是一对奇怪的夫妇。人类学家或社会历史学家将很难在文化、政治或社会层面上识别出两个不同的地方:除了语言和宗教传统不相关之外,一个国家宣扬一种基于广袤大陆的自我形象——这是现任俄罗斯总统通过入侵乌克兰而加倍强调的特征——而另一个国家,至少在今天,被认为是“岛国”(shimaguni)的狭隘特殊主义。在更细微的层面上,每个社会对待制度化和形式主义的方式也非常不同,萨哈林-北海道客运渡轮最近的动荡历史就说明了这一点,该渡轮自2018年以来因不相容的官僚机构之间的反复冲突而停运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: A leading journal of Russian and Eurasian history and culture, Kritika is dedicated to internationalizing the field and making it relevant to a broad interdisciplinary audience. The journal regularly publishes forums, discussions, and special issues; it regularly translates important works by Russian and European scholars into English; and it publishes in every issue in-depth, lengthy review articles, review essays, and reviews of Russian, Eurasian, and European works that are rarely, if ever, reviewed in North American Russian studies journals.
期刊最新文献
An Elusive Consensus "The Duty of Perfect Obedience": The Laws of Subjecthood in Tsarist Russia Reading Practices and the Uses of Print in Russian History Revolutionary Reform, Stillborn Revolution Russian History Pre-1600: A Turn to a Postcolonial Perspective?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1