The Pennybridge pioneers: understanding internal stakeholder perceptions of body-worn camera implementation

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Crime & Justice Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI:10.1080/0735648X.2022.2112265
M. C. Koen, B. Newell, M. R. Roberts
{"title":"The Pennybridge pioneers: understanding internal stakeholder perceptions of body-worn camera implementation","authors":"M. C. Koen, B. Newell, M. R. Roberts","doi":"10.1080/0735648X.2022.2112265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since body-worn cameras (BWCs) were catapulted into mainstream discourse, they have diffused rapidly across police agencies in the United States. Research followed swiftly, providing a wealth of information about how the police and citizens make sense of these technologies. Moreover, we have learned how these technologies have impacted important policing outcomes, such as citizen complaints and the use of coercive force during citizen encounters. However, despite the growing body of research, very little is known about how police stakeholders make sense of the implementation of BWCs and about their decision-making throughout the implementation process. Therefore, this research examines the decision to implement BWCs in one mid-sized municipal police department in the United States through the lens of Rogers (2003) Diffusion of Innovations theoretical framework. We rely on semi-structured interviews and observations with 17 stakeholders to address this question. Our findings show that BWC technology generally posed little uncertainty for stakeholders in terms of what it could offer conceptually. However, because the agency was an early adopter, decision-makers were confronted with significant uncertainty about practical matters such as the financial and logistical costs of implementing the technology, in addition to policy creation. These findings have important implications for scholars and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":46770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crime & Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crime & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2022.2112265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since body-worn cameras (BWCs) were catapulted into mainstream discourse, they have diffused rapidly across police agencies in the United States. Research followed swiftly, providing a wealth of information about how the police and citizens make sense of these technologies. Moreover, we have learned how these technologies have impacted important policing outcomes, such as citizen complaints and the use of coercive force during citizen encounters. However, despite the growing body of research, very little is known about how police stakeholders make sense of the implementation of BWCs and about their decision-making throughout the implementation process. Therefore, this research examines the decision to implement BWCs in one mid-sized municipal police department in the United States through the lens of Rogers (2003) Diffusion of Innovations theoretical framework. We rely on semi-structured interviews and observations with 17 stakeholders to address this question. Our findings show that BWC technology generally posed little uncertainty for stakeholders in terms of what it could offer conceptually. However, because the agency was an early adopter, decision-makers were confronted with significant uncertainty about practical matters such as the financial and logistical costs of implementing the technology, in addition to policy creation. These findings have important implications for scholars and practitioners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pennybridge的先驱者:了解内部利益相关者对穿戴式摄像头实施的看法
摘要自从随身携带的摄像头(BWCs)迅速进入主流话语以来,它们在美国的警察机构中迅速传播开来。研究迅速跟进,提供了大量关于警察和公民如何理解这些技术的信息。此外,我们还了解到这些技术如何影响重要的警务结果,例如公民投诉和在公民遭遇过程中使用强制武力。然而,尽管研究数量不断增加,但对警察利益攸关方如何理解《生物武器公约》的实施以及他们在整个实施过程中的决策知之甚少。因此,本研究通过Rogers(2003)创新扩散理论框架的视角,考察了在美国一个中型城市警察局实施BWCs的决定。我们依靠对17个利益相关者的半结构化访谈和观察来解决这个问题。我们的研究结果表明,《生物武器公约》技术在概念上可以提供什么,通常对利益攸关方几乎没有不确定性。然而,由于该机构是早期采用者,决策者除了制定政策外,还面临着实施该技术的财务和后勤成本等实际问题的重大不确定性。这些发现对学者和从业者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Crime & Justice
Journal of Crime & Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Does type of counsel matter? A Comparison of outcomes in cases involving retained- and assigned counsel An empirical analysis of the (Un)readability of inmate handbooks Opioid misuse and legislative responses in U.S. states: politics and lawmaking to address a public health crisis The impact of professional orientations on officers’ supervision behaviors in juvenile and adult community corrections: a multi-agency analysis Examining risk and risk perception on LSD and MDMA in online marketplaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1