At Work in a Pandemic: Black Workers' Experiences of Safety on the Job.

Q2 Arts and Humanities Labor Studies Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1177/0160449X221121632
Clare Hammonds, Jasmine Kerrissey
{"title":"At Work in a Pandemic: Black Workers' Experiences of Safety on the Job.","authors":"Clare Hammonds, Jasmine Kerrissey","doi":"10.1177/0160449X221121632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Race and labor scholars have argued that precarious, dangerous work, along with the work of social reproduction, has long been disproportionately placed on Black workers. This research examines how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted essential in-person workers differently by race. Using data collected from approximately 8,000 respondents in five survey waves, we find that Black essential and in-person workers were far more likely to experience safety concerns on the job than white workers, from inadequate sick leave and protective gear in the early pandemic to customers who refused to mask in later months. This pattern extended to stress off the job, where Black workers were more likely to have experienced food, childcare, and housing insecurities. Black workers were also more likely to be interested in unionization. These findings point to distinct ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic has collided with Black workers' struggle for economic inequality and amplified existing patterns of labor market inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X221121632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Race and labor scholars have argued that precarious, dangerous work, along with the work of social reproduction, has long been disproportionately placed on Black workers. This research examines how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted essential in-person workers differently by race. Using data collected from approximately 8,000 respondents in five survey waves, we find that Black essential and in-person workers were far more likely to experience safety concerns on the job than white workers, from inadequate sick leave and protective gear in the early pandemic to customers who refused to mask in later months. This pattern extended to stress off the job, where Black workers were more likely to have experienced food, childcare, and housing insecurities. Black workers were also more likely to be interested in unionization. These findings point to distinct ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic has collided with Black workers' struggle for economic inequality and amplified existing patterns of labor market inequality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病中的工作:黑人工人的工作安全经验
种族和劳工学者认为,长期以来,不稳定、危险的工作,以及社会再生产工作,一直不成比例地放在黑人工人身上。这项研究考察了新冠肺炎大流行如何因种族而对必要的住院工作人员产生不同的影响。使用从五波调查中约8000名受访者那里收集的数据,我们发现,与白人工人相比,黑人必要的和面对面的工人在工作中更容易遇到安全问题,从疫情早期的病假和防护装备不足,到后来几个月拒绝戴口罩的顾客。这种模式延伸到了工作之外的压力,黑人工人更有可能经历食物、育儿和住房的不安全感。黑人工人也更有可能对加入工会感兴趣。这些发现指出了新冠肺炎大流行与黑人工人为经济不平等而斗争的不同方式,并放大了现有的劳动力市场不平等模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Benefits and Limitations of Non-Degree Credentials: The Case of Apprenticeship in Oregon The Potential and Limits of Spontaneous Labor Activism on Social Media: The Search for Justice among Chinese Restaurant Workers Book Review: The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor by Nolan, Hamilton Book Review: Our Veterans: Winners, Losers, Friends and Enemies on the New Terrain of Veterans Affairs by Gordon, Suzanne, Steve Early and Jasper Craven Opening the Ballot Box: Examining the Union Voting Behavior of Scholarship Football Players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1