The Effect of Whiteness and Attempts to Preserve It on Political Division in the United States

Therin Alrik Showalter
{"title":"The Effect of Whiteness and Attempts to Preserve It on Political Division in the United States","authors":"Therin Alrik Showalter","doi":"10.14434/IUJUR.V4I1.24172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beginning in the early 1990s, the American public has become increasingly politically polarized. As party affiliations have become more rigid, a racial trend has emerged in which white voters are much less likely than black voters to identify as liberal or align with the Democratic Party. Using voting data from the 2016 presidential election, this study correlates the prevalence of whiteness in certain counties with those counties’ support for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. This paper first details the increasing polarization over the past decades and the dramatic shift of white voters away from liberalism. It then analyzes the political affiliations of other identity groups (such as women, millennials, and college graduates) that are majority liberal and demonstrates that, when restricted to their white members, those groups all lean conservative. \nThe research results find a significant correlation between concentrated whiteness and a rejection of Hillary Clinton. The correlation on a national level is weaker, however, than the correlation of counties when separated regionally, suggesting that the relationship between whiteness and anti-liberalism depends heavily on a county’s degree of whiteness (or anti-liberalism) in its geographical context. While it is impossible to determine whether the race of white voters consciously motivates their voting behavior, the results suggest that American democracy is informed, in some way, by the racial identities of its participants. \nThese results should encourage the public to discuss the current political climate and its intensely divided electorate from a racial perspective. If the nation perceives political division as a problem to be solved, it is essential to understand what factors might be causing the division. To that end, the results of this study would be fundamental to the nation’s dialogue and should be considered when voters make their decision on Election Day. ","PeriodicalId":92647,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University journal of undergraduate research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University journal of undergraduate research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/IUJUR.V4I1.24172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beginning in the early 1990s, the American public has become increasingly politically polarized. As party affiliations have become more rigid, a racial trend has emerged in which white voters are much less likely than black voters to identify as liberal or align with the Democratic Party. Using voting data from the 2016 presidential election, this study correlates the prevalence of whiteness in certain counties with those counties’ support for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. This paper first details the increasing polarization over the past decades and the dramatic shift of white voters away from liberalism. It then analyzes the political affiliations of other identity groups (such as women, millennials, and college graduates) that are majority liberal and demonstrates that, when restricted to their white members, those groups all lean conservative. The research results find a significant correlation between concentrated whiteness and a rejection of Hillary Clinton. The correlation on a national level is weaker, however, than the correlation of counties when separated regionally, suggesting that the relationship between whiteness and anti-liberalism depends heavily on a county’s degree of whiteness (or anti-liberalism) in its geographical context. While it is impossible to determine whether the race of white voters consciously motivates their voting behavior, the results suggest that American democracy is informed, in some way, by the racial identities of its participants. These results should encourage the public to discuss the current political climate and its intensely divided electorate from a racial perspective. If the nation perceives political division as a problem to be solved, it is essential to understand what factors might be causing the division. To that end, the results of this study would be fundamental to the nation’s dialogue and should be considered when voters make their decision on Election Day. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白人的影响及其对美国政治分裂的保护
从20世纪90年代初开始,美国公众在政治上变得越来越两极化。随着党派关系变得更加僵化,出现了一种种族趋势,即白人选民比黑人选民更不可能认为自己是自由派或与民主党结盟。利用2016年总统大选的投票数据,这项研究将某些县的白人患病率与这些县对民主党总统候选人希拉里·克林顿的支持联系起来。本文首先详细介绍了过去几十年来日益加剧的两极分化,以及白人选民远离自由主义的戏剧性转变。然后,它分析了其他身份群体(如女性、千禧一代和大学毕业生)的政治派别,这些群体多数是自由主义者,并表明,当仅限于白人成员时,这些群体都倾向于保守。研究结果发现,白人集中与拒绝希拉里•克林顿(Hillary Clinton)之间存在显著相关性。然而,在国家层面上的相关性要弱于按地区分开的县之间的相关性,这表明白人和反自由主义之间的关系在很大程度上取决于一个县在其地理背景下的白人(或反自由主义)程度。虽然不可能确定白人选民的种族是否有意识地激发了他们的投票行为,但研究结果表明,在某种程度上,美国民主是由参与者的种族身份决定的。这些结果应该鼓励公众从种族的角度来讨论当前的政治气候和其严重分裂的选民。如果国家认为政治分裂是一个需要解决的问题,那么有必要了解造成这种分裂的原因。为此,这项研究的结果将是国家对话的基础,选民在选举日做出决定时应该考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Familiar Music on Long-Term Declarative Memory in College Students Three Strikes and You’re Out: The Demographics of Indiana’s Habitual Offender Law Influences and Willingness to Receive Future COVID-19 Vaccination by Demographic Data and Proposed Interventions Proposed fMRI Study: The Role of Self-Generated Object Formation in Novel Object Category Learning Practices and Perspectives of Mental Health in the Balkan Countries: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1