Pragmatic equivalence as a challenge for interpreters of political discourse

Q4 Arts and Humanities Linguistica Silesiana Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.24425/LINSI.2019.129419
Magdalena Bartłomiejczyk
{"title":"Pragmatic equivalence as a challenge for interpreters of political discourse","authors":"Magdalena Bartłomiejczyk","doi":"10.24425/LINSI.2019.129419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article offers a discourse-analytic examination of original (English) and interpreted (Polish) versions of several extracts from plenary speeches by three Members of the European Parliament (Janusz Korwin-Mikke, Nigel Farage and Guy Verhofstadt). Controversial statements that have met with adverse reactions of the audience and/or the media are selected for analysis. The author endeavours to assess the degree to which pragmatic equivalence has been achieved by Polish interpreters. Another pertinent question is whether the identifi ed shifts are due to some systemic differences between the pragmatics of the source and target languages or to other factors, such as the constraints typical for simultaneous interpreting or specifi c, local problems.","PeriodicalId":52527,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Silesiana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica Silesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/LINSI.2019.129419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article offers a discourse-analytic examination of original (English) and interpreted (Polish) versions of several extracts from plenary speeches by three Members of the European Parliament (Janusz Korwin-Mikke, Nigel Farage and Guy Verhofstadt). Controversial statements that have met with adverse reactions of the audience and/or the media are selected for analysis. The author endeavours to assess the degree to which pragmatic equivalence has been achieved by Polish interpreters. Another pertinent question is whether the identifi ed shifts are due to some systemic differences between the pragmatics of the source and target languages or to other factors, such as the constraints typical for simultaneous interpreting or specifi c, local problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语用对等对政治话语译员的挑战
本文对三位欧洲议会议员(Janusz Korwin-Mikke, Nigel Farage和Guy Verhofstadt)的全体会议演讲的几个摘录的原文(英语)和翻译(波兰语)进行了话语分析。有争议的言论,已经遇到了观众和/或媒体的不良反应进行分析。作者试图评估波兰语口译所达到的语用对等程度。另一个相关的问题是,所确定的变化是由于源语和目标语的语用学之间的一些系统差异,还是其他因素,例如同声传译的典型限制或具体的地方问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistica Silesiana
Linguistica Silesiana Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Speech Act Patterns In Anthropological Pragmatics The Maintenance Of Landawe Language And Its Correlation To People's Attitudes In North Konawe, Southeast Sulawesi Analyzing Linguistic Variations In The Discussion Sections Of Pakistani English Research Articles: A Multidimensional Study Силезский Демонический Топос В Номинативной Специфике. Топография . = The Silesian Demonic Topos In The Nomination Perspective. The Topography Metáfora Conceptual En El Discurso Del Movimiento Bodypositive En Instagram. Análisis Contrastivo Español-Polaco. = Conceptual Metaphor In The Discourse Of The Bodypositive Movement On Instagram. Spanish-Polish Contrastive Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1