Mapping the infotainment literature: current trajectories and suggestions for future research

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10714421.2019.1682894
Robert Marinov
{"title":"Mapping the infotainment literature: current trajectories and suggestions for future research","authors":"Robert Marinov","doi":"10.1080/10714421.2019.1682894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Academic interest in what has been termed “infotainment” has grown considerably since the term was coined in the 1980s. Today, the burgeoning field of infotainment research has become an important interdisciplinary field of study producing numerous political, cultural, and social insights. Nevertheless, infotainment remains highly contested, multifaceted, and incoherent, both as a term and a field of study. Preliminary attempts have been made to give greater conceptual clarity and standardization to the term, although their success has been limited, leaving difficulties in analyzing and comparing findings in a unified manner. In this review essay I outline the findings from a comprehensive literature review by delineating three mains trajectories of infotainment research: (1) research on soft news programming; (2) research on traditional news media; and (3) research on media systems and global infotainment. To conclude, I offer three suggestions for future infotainment research, arguing that scholars should attempt to achieve standardization and conceptual clarity within, rather than across research trajectories, that political theory should be more explicitly incorporated into the literature for the purposes of standardizing methods and clarifying normative debates, and that research should also focus on the synergies between contemporary trends in political campaign/communications strategies and trends in infotainment.","PeriodicalId":46140,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","volume":"23 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10714421.2019.1682894","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2019.1682894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Academic interest in what has been termed “infotainment” has grown considerably since the term was coined in the 1980s. Today, the burgeoning field of infotainment research has become an important interdisciplinary field of study producing numerous political, cultural, and social insights. Nevertheless, infotainment remains highly contested, multifaceted, and incoherent, both as a term and a field of study. Preliminary attempts have been made to give greater conceptual clarity and standardization to the term, although their success has been limited, leaving difficulties in analyzing and comparing findings in a unified manner. In this review essay I outline the findings from a comprehensive literature review by delineating three mains trajectories of infotainment research: (1) research on soft news programming; (2) research on traditional news media; and (3) research on media systems and global infotainment. To conclude, I offer three suggestions for future infotainment research, arguing that scholars should attempt to achieve standardization and conceptual clarity within, rather than across research trajectories, that political theory should be more explicitly incorporated into the literature for the purposes of standardizing methods and clarifying normative debates, and that research should also focus on the synergies between contemporary trends in political campaign/communications strategies and trends in infotainment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制信息娱乐文学:当前的轨迹和对未来研究的建议
自20世纪80年代“信息娱乐”一词被创造出来以来,学术界对这个词的兴趣已经大大增加了。今天,新兴的信息娱乐研究领域已经成为一个重要的跨学科研究领域,产生了许多政治、文化和社会见解。然而,无论是作为一个术语还是作为一个研究领域,信息娱乐仍然是高度争议的、多方面的和不连贯的。已经初步尝试使这一术语在概念上更加明确和标准化,尽管取得的成功有限,在以统一的方式分析和比较结果方面留下了困难。在这篇综述性文章中,我通过描述信息娱乐研究的三个主要轨迹来概述综合文献综述的发现:(1)软新闻节目研究;(2)传统新闻媒体研究;(3)媒介系统与全球信息娱乐研究。最后,我为未来的信息娱乐研究提供了三个建议,认为学者们应该尝试在研究轨迹内而不是跨研究轨迹实现标准化和概念清晰度,政治理论应该更明确地纳入文献,以使方法标准化和澄清规范性辩论。该研究还应侧重于政治运动/传播策略的当代趋势与信息娱乐趋势之间的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION REVIEW
COMMUNICATION REVIEW COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The assimilated secret: Understanding as silence in Japanese LGBT discourse Skilling communication: The discourse and metadiscourse of communication in self-help books Young climate activists in television news: An analysis of multimodal constructions of voice, political recognition, and co-optation Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood How U.S.-based children’s news show CNN 10 reproduces neoliberal hegemony: A critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1