All Mouth and No Trousers? Observations Arising from the Decision on Jurisdiction in Re Evans

IF 0.6 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Ecclesiastical Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S0956618X22000631
Neil Patterson
{"title":"All Mouth and No Trousers? Observations Arising from the Decision on Jurisdiction in Re Evans","authors":"Neil Patterson","doi":"10.1017/S0956618X22000631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the time of writing, work continues on a replacement for the Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 (CDM 2003). This comment explores some issues which have arisen in a recent disciplinary case – Re Evans – where, for the first time, the boundaries of the CDM jurisdiction have been considered by the tribunal. I will first identify the salient facts of the Evans case, before moving on to explore the specific issue of jurisdiction. I conclude with some observations about why this case is significant, especially for those working on the replacement to the CDM 2003.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"52 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956618X22000631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the time of writing, work continues on a replacement for the Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 (CDM 2003). This comment explores some issues which have arisen in a recent disciplinary case – Re Evans – where, for the first time, the boundaries of the CDM jurisdiction have been considered by the tribunal. I will first identify the salient facts of the Evans case, before moving on to explore the specific issue of jurisdiction. I conclude with some observations about why this case is significant, especially for those working on the replacement to the CDM 2003.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全口无裤?Re Evans案管辖权决定引起的意见
在编写本报告时,替代《2003年神职人员纪律措施》(CDM 2003)的工作仍在继续。本评论探讨了最近的一个纪律案件Re-Evans中出现的一些问题,在该案件中,仲裁庭首次审议了CDM管辖权的边界。我将首先确定埃文斯案的突出事实,然后再探讨管辖权的具体问题。最后,我提出一些看法,说明为什么这个案例意义重大,特别是对于那些致力于替代清洁发展机制2003的人来说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
When a doctrine is not a doctrine: understating the intersection of civil and canon law and the ‘doctrine’ of marriage in the Anglican Church of Australia Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax In defence of the Chancellor: a personal perspective Re St Thomas the Apostle, Killinghall Re St Anselm's Church, Kennington Cross
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1