Habitat suitability map of Ixodes ricinus tick in France using multi-criteria analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Geospatial Health Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI:10.4081/gh.2022.1058
I. Lebert, Séverine Bord, C. Saint-Andrieux, Eva Cassar, P. Gasqui, F. Beugnet, K. Chalvet-Monfray, S. Vanwambeke, G. Vourc'h, M. René-Martellet
{"title":"Habitat suitability map of Ixodes ricinus tick in France using multi-criteria analysis.","authors":"I. Lebert, Séverine Bord, C. Saint-Andrieux, Eva Cassar, P. Gasqui, F. Beugnet, K. Chalvet-Monfray, S. Vanwambeke, G. Vourc'h, M. René-Martellet","doi":"10.4081/gh.2022.1058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tick Ixodes ricinus is widely distributed across Europe and is responsible for the transmission of several pathogens to humans and animals. In this study, we used a knowledge-based method to map variations in habitat suitability for I. ricinus ticks throughout continental France and Corsica. The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) integrated four major biotic and abiotic factors known to influence tick populations: climate, land cover, altitude and the density of wild ungulates. For each factor, habitat suitability index (HSI) values were attributed to different locations based on knowledge regarding its impact on tick populations. For the MCDA, two methods of factor combination were tested, additive and multiplicative, both which were evaluated at the spatial scales of departments and local municipalities. The resulting habitat suitability maps (resolution=100x100 m) revealed that conditions are suitable for I. ricinus over most of France and Corsica. Particularly suitable habitats were located in central, north-eastern and south-western France, while less-suitable habitats were found in the Mediterranean and mountainous regions. To validate the approach, the HSI scores were compared to field data of I. ricinus nymph abundance. Regardless of scale, the correlation between abundance indicator and HSI score was stronger for the additive than for the multiplicative approach. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of MCDA for estimating habitat suitability maps for I. ricinus abundance, which could be especially useful in highlighting areas of the tick's distribution where preventive measures should be prioritised.","PeriodicalId":56260,"journal":{"name":"Geospatial Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geospatial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2022.1058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The tick Ixodes ricinus is widely distributed across Europe and is responsible for the transmission of several pathogens to humans and animals. In this study, we used a knowledge-based method to map variations in habitat suitability for I. ricinus ticks throughout continental France and Corsica. The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) integrated four major biotic and abiotic factors known to influence tick populations: climate, land cover, altitude and the density of wild ungulates. For each factor, habitat suitability index (HSI) values were attributed to different locations based on knowledge regarding its impact on tick populations. For the MCDA, two methods of factor combination were tested, additive and multiplicative, both which were evaluated at the spatial scales of departments and local municipalities. The resulting habitat suitability maps (resolution=100x100 m) revealed that conditions are suitable for I. ricinus over most of France and Corsica. Particularly suitable habitats were located in central, north-eastern and south-western France, while less-suitable habitats were found in the Mediterranean and mountainous regions. To validate the approach, the HSI scores were compared to field data of I. ricinus nymph abundance. Regardless of scale, the correlation between abundance indicator and HSI score was stronger for the additive than for the multiplicative approach. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of MCDA for estimating habitat suitability maps for I. ricinus abundance, which could be especially useful in highlighting areas of the tick's distribution where preventive measures should be prioritised.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多标准分析法绘制法国蓖麻蜱生境适宜性图。
蓖麻蜱广泛分布在欧洲各地,并负责将几种病原体传播给人类和动物。在这项研究中,我们使用了一种基于知识的方法来绘制整个法国大陆和科西嘉岛蓖麻蜱生境适宜性的变化。多标准决策分析(MCDA)综合了已知影响蜱虫种群的四种主要生物和非生物因素:气候、土地覆盖、海拔和野生有蹄动物密度。对于每个因子,生境适宜性指数(HSI)值基于其对蜱虫种群影响的知识归因于不同的位置。对MCDA进行了加性和乘性两种因子组合方法的检验,并在部门和直辖市的空间尺度上进行了评价。绘制的生境适宜性图(分辨率为100 × 100 m)显示,法国和科西嘉岛的大部分地区条件适宜蓖麻蠓生长。特别适合的栖息地位于法国中部、东北部和西南部,而不太适合的栖息地则位于地中海和山区。为了验证该方法,将HSI评分与蓖麻若虫丰度的现场数据进行了比较。无论何种尺度,加性方法的丰度指标与恒生指数评分之间的相关性强于乘法方法。总的来说,这项研究证明了MCDA在估计蓖麻蜱丰富度的栖息地适宜性地图方面的价值,这在突出蜱的分布区域时尤其有用,这些区域应该优先采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geospatial Health
Geospatial Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The focus of the journal is on all aspects of the application of geographical information systems, remote sensing, global positioning systems, spatial statistics and other geospatial tools in human and veterinary health. The journal publishes two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Childhood stunting in Indonesia: assessing the performance of Bayesian spatial conditional autoregressive models. A two-stage location model covering COVID-19 sampling, transport and DNA diagnosis: design of a national scheme for infection control. The distribution of cardiovascular diseases in Tanzania: a spatio-temporal investigation. Performance of a negative binomial-GLM in spatial scan statistic: a case study of low-birth weights in Pakistan. Tuberculosis in Aceh Province, Indonesia: a spatial epidemiological study covering the period 2019-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1