Wenhua dacai (great cultural talent): paradoxical discourses and practices in the revival of Confucian classical education in contemporary China

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia Pacific Education Review Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s12564-023-09891-9
Canglong Wang, Shuo Wang, Youjiang Gao
{"title":"Wenhua dacai (great cultural talent): paradoxical discourses and practices in the revival of Confucian classical education in contemporary China","authors":"Canglong Wang,&nbsp;Shuo Wang,&nbsp;Youjiang Gao","doi":"10.1007/s12564-023-09891-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cultivating <i>wenhua dacai</i> (great cultural talent) is a central goal of the ongoing <i>dujing</i> (classics reading) education movement, which is an integral part of the broad Confucian revival in contemporary China. Focusing on the concept of <i>wenhua dacai</i>, this article explores three interrelated issues. First, as a term used in the context of <i>dujing</i> education, <i>wenhua dacai</i> refers to an idealized Confucian subject shaped by an interweaving of nationalism and cosmopolitanism. Moreover, it is expected not only to revive Confucian/Chinese culture but also to contribute to human cultural exchange. Second, the tendency of students to embrace individualistic virtues in their experience of classics reading poses a challenge to the lofty and sacred ideal of <i>wenhua dacai</i>, which reinforces the need for rigid discipline in learners. Finally, contextualizing the idea of <i>wenhua dacai</i> into the general transformation of education in China can contribute to a more thorough understanding of it. This article concludes that the cultivation of <i>wenhua dacai</i> dreamed of by Confucian <i>dujing</i> education activists is constituted by paradoxical discourses and practices embedded in the ideological complexities of Chinese education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":"24 4","pages":"695 - 704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-023-09891-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cultivating wenhua dacai (great cultural talent) is a central goal of the ongoing dujing (classics reading) education movement, which is an integral part of the broad Confucian revival in contemporary China. Focusing on the concept of wenhua dacai, this article explores three interrelated issues. First, as a term used in the context of dujing education, wenhua dacai refers to an idealized Confucian subject shaped by an interweaving of nationalism and cosmopolitanism. Moreover, it is expected not only to revive Confucian/Chinese culture but also to contribute to human cultural exchange. Second, the tendency of students to embrace individualistic virtues in their experience of classics reading poses a challenge to the lofty and sacred ideal of wenhua dacai, which reinforces the need for rigid discipline in learners. Finally, contextualizing the idea of wenhua dacai into the general transformation of education in China can contribute to a more thorough understanding of it. This article concludes that the cultivation of wenhua dacai dreamed of by Confucian dujing education activists is constituted by paradoxical discourses and practices embedded in the ideological complexities of Chinese education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文华大才:当代中国儒家经典教育复兴中的悖论话语与实践
培养伟大的文化人才是正在进行的“读经”教育运动的中心目标,这是当代中国广泛的儒家复兴的一个组成部分。本文围绕文华大菜的概念,探讨了三个相互关联的问题。首先,作为都经教育背景下的一个术语,文华大才指的是一个理想化的儒家主体,它是由民族主义和世界主义交织形成的。此外,它不仅有望复兴儒家/中国文化,而且有望为人类文化交流做出贡献。其次,学生在经典阅读体验中倾向于接受个人主义美德,这对崇高神圣的文华达才理想构成了挑战,这加强了对学习者严格纪律的需求。最后,将文华人才的理念置于中国教育总体转型的语境中,有助于我们对文华人才的理解更加透彻。本文的结论是,儒家儒学教育活动家所梦想的文华大才的培养是由嵌入中国教育意识形态复杂性中的矛盾话语和实践构成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Education Review
Asia Pacific Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context. APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003. APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).
期刊最新文献
Development of instructional design principles for using ICT in resource-limited learning environments: a case of Bangladesh Teacher’s views on professional learning and development in primary schools in Fiji Effects of the English language intervention as a foreign language for struggling elementary readers in South Korea: a meta-analysis Foreign higher education and corruption: is host country knowledge a blessing or a curse? Empirical evidence from MENA countries The trajectory of teachers’ multicultural transformation: an analysis of teachers’ beliefs about mathematics as a school subject
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1