The credibility of a smartphone-based application for use as a hearing screening tool in underserved areas

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Indian Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_60_22
Satish Chokalingam, Prakash Mathiyalagen, Kumaran Alias Ramesh Colbert, Bhanu Vazhumuni, Sathiyaseelan Murugesan, Niveda Nagarajan
{"title":"The credibility of a smartphone-based application for use as a hearing screening tool in underserved areas","authors":"Satish Chokalingam, Prakash Mathiyalagen, Kumaran Alias Ramesh Colbert, Bhanu Vazhumuni, Sathiyaseelan Murugesan, Niveda Nagarajan","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_60_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Hearing loss has been rightly regarded as “invisible disability.” Globally, it is the third largest cause for years lived with disability. It is imperative to detect it early to initiate remedial measures. We intended to find a cheaper, quick, and reliable alternative to the traditional audiological services. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the hearing levels using a self-administered smartphone hearing application and compare these results with pure-tone audiograms performed by an audiologist. Settings and Design: This diagnostic study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in the State of Puducherry, between 2019 and 2021. Subjects and Methods: One hundred and nineteen participants were recruited; hearing screening was done using the smartphone application “Hearing Test” followed by pure-tone audiometry. Statistical Analysis Used: The results were analyzed for validity and reliability using SPSS software. Results: The mean age was 34.23 ± 9.39 years, and 57.1% had ear complaints at presentation. At the level of statistical significance of P = 0.05, no difference was found between the tests. An absolute difference of <6.712 for each frequency was observed with the average difference being 5.18 dB (95% confidence interval 5.65–4.73) with standard deviation of 3.56. The smartphone application demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.26% and a specificity of 98.99%. Conclusions: We did not find any significant difference between the application and pure-tone thresholds in any frequency. Thus, the Hearing Test application is a valid screening tool to assess hearing loss early.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"28 1","pages":"296 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_60_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: Hearing loss has been rightly regarded as “invisible disability.” Globally, it is the third largest cause for years lived with disability. It is imperative to detect it early to initiate remedial measures. We intended to find a cheaper, quick, and reliable alternative to the traditional audiological services. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the hearing levels using a self-administered smartphone hearing application and compare these results with pure-tone audiograms performed by an audiologist. Settings and Design: This diagnostic study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in the State of Puducherry, between 2019 and 2021. Subjects and Methods: One hundred and nineteen participants were recruited; hearing screening was done using the smartphone application “Hearing Test” followed by pure-tone audiometry. Statistical Analysis Used: The results were analyzed for validity and reliability using SPSS software. Results: The mean age was 34.23 ± 9.39 years, and 57.1% had ear complaints at presentation. At the level of statistical significance of P = 0.05, no difference was found between the tests. An absolute difference of <6.712 for each frequency was observed with the average difference being 5.18 dB (95% confidence interval 5.65–4.73) with standard deviation of 3.56. The smartphone application demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.26% and a specificity of 98.99%. Conclusions: We did not find any significant difference between the application and pure-tone thresholds in any frequency. Thus, the Hearing Test application is a valid screening tool to assess hearing loss early.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于智能手机的应用程序在服务不足的地区用作听力筛查工具的可信度
背景:听力损失被正确地视为“隐形残疾”。在全球范围内,听力损失是多年残疾的第三大原因。当务之急是尽早发现,以便采取补救措施。我们打算找到一种更便宜、快速、可靠的替代传统听力学服务的方法。目的:本研究的目的是使用自行管理的智能手机听力应用程序评估听力水平,并将这些结果与听力学家进行的纯音听力图进行比较。设置和设计:这项诊断研究于2019年至2021年间在普杜切里州的一家三级护理医院进行。受试者和方法:共招募了119名受试者;听力筛查是使用智能手机应用程序“听力测试”进行的,然后是纯音听力测试。使用统计分析:使用SPSS软件对结果进行有效性和可靠性分析。结果:平均年龄为34.23±9.39岁,57.1%的患者在就诊时有耳部不适。在统计学显著性水平P=0.05时,两次测试之间没有发现差异。观察到每个频率的绝对差异<6.712,平均差异为5.18 dB(95%置信区间5.65–4.73),标准偏差为3.56。智能手机应用程序的灵敏度为76.26%,特异性为98.99%。结论:我们在任何频率下都没有发现应用程序和纯音阈值之间的任何显著差异。因此,听力测试应用程序是早期评估听力损失的有效筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media Application of finite element model of middle ear in the study of the middle ear biomechanics in normal and diseased states Transmastoid titanium mesh assisted extra dural layered closure of tegmen defect: Case report in a 10 year old Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1