Understanding priorities of care: An assessment of FAMCARE-2 satisfaction surveys and thematic analysis in community palliative care

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE Pub Date : 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1080/09699260.2023.2241786
Matthew Cooper, Amanda Fischer, Natalie Dubrowin, Carol Kilkenny, Phillip Good
{"title":"Understanding priorities of care: An assessment of FAMCARE-2 satisfaction surveys and thematic analysis in community palliative care","authors":"Matthew Cooper, Amanda Fischer, Natalie Dubrowin, Carol Kilkenny, Phillip Good","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2023.2241786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The palliative care sector currently faces cumulative challenges and finite resources to meet population needs. To optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of palliative care services, it is necessary to understand care needs and aspects prioritised by patients and families. Deepening our understanding of their experience and preferences will direct the sector’s limited resources toward achieving optimal care in the place of choice. Aim To assesses patient and carer satisfaction of a community palliative care service and to identify common themes that impact the experience of care, and the aspects of care that are important to them. Method A single-centre, prospective study exploring patient and carer satisfaction of two cohorts (patients receiving standard palliative care, or additional and intensive care support) via the Bupa Palliative Care Choices (BPCC) programme. A tool specifically designed to measure satisfaction with palliative care was utilised. Survey comments in the BPCC cohort were analysed thematically. Results Survey response rate was 35% and satisfaction results across all domains were high in both cohorts (very satisfied/satisfied >90%). Thematic analysis of comments identified priorities of care being emotional support for the patient and family, availability of the palliative care team, a focus on patient dignity, and provision of information relating to the patient’s condition and illness trajectory. Conclusion This study provides insights into patient and family priorities of care and identifies areas of need as emotional support, availability of and access to 24-hour care, respecting patient’s dignity, and transparent discussions regarding the patient’s condition and illness trajectory.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2023.2241786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The palliative care sector currently faces cumulative challenges and finite resources to meet population needs. To optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of palliative care services, it is necessary to understand care needs and aspects prioritised by patients and families. Deepening our understanding of their experience and preferences will direct the sector’s limited resources toward achieving optimal care in the place of choice. Aim To assesses patient and carer satisfaction of a community palliative care service and to identify common themes that impact the experience of care, and the aspects of care that are important to them. Method A single-centre, prospective study exploring patient and carer satisfaction of two cohorts (patients receiving standard palliative care, or additional and intensive care support) via the Bupa Palliative Care Choices (BPCC) programme. A tool specifically designed to measure satisfaction with palliative care was utilised. Survey comments in the BPCC cohort were analysed thematically. Results Survey response rate was 35% and satisfaction results across all domains were high in both cohorts (very satisfied/satisfied >90%). Thematic analysis of comments identified priorities of care being emotional support for the patient and family, availability of the palliative care team, a focus on patient dignity, and provision of information relating to the patient’s condition and illness trajectory. Conclusion This study provides insights into patient and family priorities of care and identifies areas of need as emotional support, availability of and access to 24-hour care, respecting patient’s dignity, and transparent discussions regarding the patient’s condition and illness trajectory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解护理的优先事项:社区姑息治疗中FAMCARE-2满意度调查和主题分析的评估
背景姑息治疗部门目前面临着累积的挑战和有限的资源来满足人口需求。为了优化姑息治疗服务的有效性和效率,有必要了解患者和家属的护理需求和优先考虑的方面。加深我们对他们的经验和偏好的理解,将引导该部门有限的资源在他们选择的地方实现最佳护理。目的评估患者和护理人员对社区姑息治疗服务的满意度,并确定影响护理体验的共同主题,以及对他们重要的护理方面。方法一项单中心前瞻性研究,通过Bupa姑息治疗选择(BPCC)项目,探讨两组患者和护理人员的满意度(接受标准姑息治疗的患者,或接受额外和重症监护支持的患者)。使用了一种专门设计的工具来测量对姑息治疗的满意度。对BPCC队列的调查意见进行主题分析。结果调查回复率为35%,两组人群在所有领域的满意度都很高(非常满意/满意>90%)。对评论的专题分析确定了护理的优先事项,即为患者和家属提供情感支持、提供姑息治疗团队、关注患者尊严以及提供与患者病情和疾病轨迹有关的信息。本研究提供了患者和家庭护理优先级的见解,并确定了情感支持,24小时护理的可用性和可及性,尊重患者的尊严,以及关于患者病情和疾病轨迹的透明讨论等需求领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID-19 and community services on palliative care unit admissions: A retrospective cohort study A qualitative evidence synthesis exploring the attitudes, beliefs and values of the long-term care workforce towards palliative care Evidence-based physiotherapy interventions: evaluation of current practice in a palliative care service Feasibility and economic benefits of community-based palliative care in regional Australia: A case study with cost analysis Exploring the competency and confidence levels of physiotherapists in the management of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illnesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1