Circumcision in Bali? a survey of knowledge and attitude of Balinese parents toward their son’s circumcision in elementary school Denpasar, Bali

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bali Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI:10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3516
I. W. J. Junior, Rizky Darmawan, Dhanu Aryawangsa, Adi Satrya Palguna, Nindya Prahasari, Anak Agung Gde Oka
{"title":"Circumcision in Bali? a survey of knowledge and attitude of Balinese parents toward their son’s circumcision in elementary school Denpasar, Bali","authors":"I. W. J. Junior, Rizky Darmawan, Dhanu Aryawangsa, Adi Satrya Palguna, Nindya Prahasari, Anak Agung Gde Oka","doi":"10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many factors were involved performing circumcision such as knowledge, religion, or culture. Circumcision was the most common surgical procedure, but considered low in Bali. This study aims to determine the general knowledge and attitudes of parents towards the decision to make circumcision in children in the city of Denpasar.\nMethods: A study in Denpasar area involving 1655 questionnaires was filled out by one parent who had at least one son in the Denpasar elementary school.\nResults: The response rate was 86.5% (1655); Most respondents were fathers (55.3%), Hinduism (66,8%), and educational level was high school (45%). 70,5% respondents didn’t circumcise their sons. 51% respondents believe that circumcision was necessary. Most reason to circumcision was better hygiene (52.3%). The best age for circumcision was Elementary School (76.4%). Most reason for not being circumcision was didn’t know medical benefits (30.6%). It was found that most respondents had good knowledge (71.9%). Parents with a high level of education were more positive in responding to circumcision in their sons (P <0.05). Mothers were more positive in responding to circumcision (P <0.05). no significant differences were found in the respondents of father and mother to level of knowledge about circumcision.\nConclusion: This study concluded that most respondents had well knowledge about circumcision but majority didn’t circumcise their son. More future research is needed to describe the condition of circumcision in some regions in Indonesia and it’s important to both children and parents know about advantage and disadvantage of circumcision.","PeriodicalId":44369,"journal":{"name":"Bali Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many factors were involved performing circumcision such as knowledge, religion, or culture. Circumcision was the most common surgical procedure, but considered low in Bali. This study aims to determine the general knowledge and attitudes of parents towards the decision to make circumcision in children in the city of Denpasar. Methods: A study in Denpasar area involving 1655 questionnaires was filled out by one parent who had at least one son in the Denpasar elementary school. Results: The response rate was 86.5% (1655); Most respondents were fathers (55.3%), Hinduism (66,8%), and educational level was high school (45%). 70,5% respondents didn’t circumcise their sons. 51% respondents believe that circumcision was necessary. Most reason to circumcision was better hygiene (52.3%). The best age for circumcision was Elementary School (76.4%). Most reason for not being circumcision was didn’t know medical benefits (30.6%). It was found that most respondents had good knowledge (71.9%). Parents with a high level of education were more positive in responding to circumcision in their sons (P <0.05). Mothers were more positive in responding to circumcision (P <0.05). no significant differences were found in the respondents of father and mother to level of knowledge about circumcision. Conclusion: This study concluded that most respondents had well knowledge about circumcision but majority didn’t circumcise their son. More future research is needed to describe the condition of circumcision in some regions in Indonesia and it’s important to both children and parents know about advantage and disadvantage of circumcision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴厘岛的包皮环切术?巴厘岛登巴萨小学家长对儿子包皮环切术的认知和态度调查
背景:实施包皮环切术涉及许多因素,如知识、宗教或文化。包皮环切术是最常见的外科手术,但在巴厘岛被认为很低。本研究旨在确定家长对登巴萨市儿童进行包皮环切手术的一般知识和态度。方法:在登巴萨地区进行一项研究,由一名在登巴萨小学至少有一个儿子的家长填写1655份问卷。结果:有效率为86.5%(1655);大多数受访者是父亲(55.3%)、印度教(66,8%)和高中文化水平(45%)。70.5%的受访者没有给儿子做包皮环切手术。51%的受访者认为包皮环切术是必要的。包皮环切术的主要原因是卫生条件好(52.3%)。包皮环切手术的最佳年龄是小学(76.4%)。不进行包皮环切的大多数原因是不知道医疗益处(30.6%)。调查发现,大多数受访者都有良好的知识(71.9%)。受教育程度高的父母对儿子的包皮环切反应更积极(P<0.05)。母亲父亲和母亲对包皮环切术的知识水平无显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:这项研究得出的结论是,大多数受访者对包皮环切术有很好的了解,但大多数人没有给他们的儿子做包皮环切手术。未来还需要更多的研究来描述印尼一些地区的包皮环切情况,让孩子和父母都知道包皮环切的优点和缺点很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Medical Journal
Bali Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of fractionated ethanol red ginger (Zingiber officinale var. rubrum) extract on the pH level of Streptococcus gordonii metabolism (In-vitro Laboratory Experimental Research) Efficacy of combination therapy 5% permethrin cream and precipitated sulfur (ointment 2-4) compared with single therapy of 5% permethrin cream in children Hemangioma activity score evaluation in infantile hemangioma patients: a retrospective study Effect of Paraquat toxicity on lung and kidney organs on histopathological image assessment Mortality comparison between axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SND) among breast cancer pantient: A meta-analysis and systematic review study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1