Termination of Prosecutions Based On Restorative Justice in The Settlement of Criminal Cases In The Area of The High Prosecutors Of Lampung

Yuris Oktaviyani Citizen
{"title":"Termination of Prosecutions Based On Restorative Justice in The Settlement of Criminal Cases In The Area of The High Prosecutors Of Lampung","authors":"Yuris Oktaviyani Citizen","doi":"10.25041/plr.v3i2.2734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia has issued a breakthrough in efforts to resolve cases through the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. The Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, a law enforcement officer referred to as a case controller based on the dominus litis principle has a significant role in determining the success of applying restorative justice in Indonesia. Therefore, this article examines and analyzes the implementation and inhibiting factors for stopping prosecutions based on restorative justice in settlement of criminal cases in the Lampung High Court area. The research method in writing this paper uses a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach, with 6 (six) sources from academics and the Public Prosecutor in the Lampung High Prosecutor's Office. The data is then processed and analyzed cumulatively. Based on the research results, the Lampung High Court has adopted the termination of restorative justice-based prosecutions in three (three) District Attorney's Offices. Meanwhile, the obstacle to stopping restorative justice-based prosecutions in the Lampung High Court area is dominated by overlapping arrangements for implementing restorative justice between law enforcement agencies, namely the Prosecutor's office and the police, which legal uncertainty and lead to disparities in law enforcement and the lack of community participation, especially among victims.","PeriodicalId":52575,"journal":{"name":"Pancasila and Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancasila and Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v3i2.2734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia has issued a breakthrough in efforts to resolve cases through the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. The Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, a law enforcement officer referred to as a case controller based on the dominus litis principle has a significant role in determining the success of applying restorative justice in Indonesia. Therefore, this article examines and analyzes the implementation and inhibiting factors for stopping prosecutions based on restorative justice in settlement of criminal cases in the Lampung High Court area. The research method in writing this paper uses a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach, with 6 (six) sources from academics and the Public Prosecutor in the Lampung High Prosecutor's Office. The data is then processed and analyzed cumulatively. Based on the research results, the Lampung High Court has adopted the termination of restorative justice-based prosecutions in three (three) District Attorney's Offices. Meanwhile, the obstacle to stopping restorative justice-based prosecutions in the Lampung High Court area is dominated by overlapping arrangements for implementing restorative justice between law enforcement agencies, namely the Prosecutor's office and the police, which legal uncertainty and lead to disparities in law enforcement and the lack of community participation, especially among victims.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于恢复性司法的终止起诉在南邦高级检察官辖区刑事案件处理中的应用
印度尼西亚共和国总检察长办公室通过终止基于恢复性司法的起诉,在解决案件的努力方面取得了突破。印度尼西亚共和国检察官办公室是一名被称为案件控制员的执法官员,根据民事主体原则,在决定印度尼西亚是否成功实施恢复性司法方面发挥着重要作用。因此,本文对楠邦高等法院地区刑事案件解决中基于恢复性司法的停止起诉的实施和制约因素进行了考察和分析。撰写本文的研究方法使用规范的司法和实证司法方法,来自学者和楠pung高级检察官办公室的检察官的6(6)个来源。然后对数据进行累积处理和分析。根据研究结果,楠邦高等法院在三个地区检察官办公室采取了终止恢复性司法起诉的措施。同时,在楠邦高等法院地区制止以恢复性司法为基础的起诉的障碍主要是执法机构,即检察官办公室和警察之间在执行恢复性司法方面的重叠安排,这种安排在法律上不确定,并导致执法方面的差异和缺乏社区参与,特别是受害者的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reflecting Pancasila in Environmental Crimes Enforcement: Diffusing Values to Indonesia’s Laws Re-evaluating the Legal and Institutional Complications Affecting the Protection of Women's Rights in Cameroon: The Need to Remedying the Odds Equity Crowdfunding: The Secondary Market’s Implementation and Legal Protection for Investors Using Technology-Based Crowdfunding Global Minimum Tax Implementation: Vietnam's Policy Recommendations Rethinking The Feasibility of Pancasila as a Scientific Paradigm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1