Difficulties experienced by endodontics researchers in conducting studies and writing papers.

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2022-03-15 eCollection Date: 2022-05-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2022.47.e20
Betul Aycan Alim-Uysal, Selin Goker-Kamali, Ricardo Machado
{"title":"Difficulties experienced by endodontics researchers in conducting studies and writing papers.","authors":"Betul Aycan Alim-Uysal, Selin Goker-Kamali, Ricardo Machado","doi":"10.5395/rde.2022.47.e20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study investigated the difficulties experienced by endodontics researchers around the world in conducting studies and writing papers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey consisting of 18 questions on the difficulties experienced by endodontics researchers in performing studies and writing papers was e-mailed to academics in the field of endodontics working at 202 universities. The independent risk factors were analyzed using binary logistic regression at a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 581 individuals (10.7%) agreed to participate in the study. Almost half the participants (48.2%) reported that they had received some type of training in conducting studies and writing papers. In response to the question, \"Do you get help from a statistician to perform the statistical analyses of your studies?,\" 77.1% answered \"yes.\" Around 40% of the participants stated that the need to obtain ethical approval negatively affected their desire to conduct studies. The participants' regions had no effect on the reported difficulties associated with writing papers in English or conducting statistical analyses (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Most participants (81.8%) reported difficulties in writing the Discussion section, regardless of their region, academic degrees, or years of experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The participants stated they experienced difficulties in many areas, such as conducting statistical analyses, finding new ideas, and writing in English. Engaging in a detailed examination of ethics committee rules, expanding biostatistics education, increasing the number of institutions providing research funding, and increasing the number of endodontics journals can increase the enthusiasm of endodontics researchers to publish papers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study investigated the difficulties experienced by endodontics researchers around the world in conducting studies and writing papers.

Materials and methods: A survey consisting of 18 questions on the difficulties experienced by endodontics researchers in performing studies and writing papers was e-mailed to academics in the field of endodontics working at 202 universities. The independent risk factors were analyzed using binary logistic regression at a significance level of 0.05.

Results: A total of 581 individuals (10.7%) agreed to participate in the study. Almost half the participants (48.2%) reported that they had received some type of training in conducting studies and writing papers. In response to the question, "Do you get help from a statistician to perform the statistical analyses of your studies?," 77.1% answered "yes." Around 40% of the participants stated that the need to obtain ethical approval negatively affected their desire to conduct studies. The participants' regions had no effect on the reported difficulties associated with writing papers in English or conducting statistical analyses (p > 0.05). Most participants (81.8%) reported difficulties in writing the Discussion section, regardless of their region, academic degrees, or years of experience.

Conclusions: The participants stated they experienced difficulties in many areas, such as conducting statistical analyses, finding new ideas, and writing in English. Engaging in a detailed examination of ethics committee rules, expanding biostatistics education, increasing the number of institutions providing research funding, and increasing the number of endodontics journals can increase the enthusiasm of endodontics researchers to publish papers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙髓学研究人员在进行研究和撰写论文时遇到的困难
目的本研究调查了世界各地牙髓病研究人员在进行研究和撰写论文时遇到的困难。材料和方法一项由18个问题组成的调查,涉及牙髓病研究人员在进行研究和撰写论文时遇到的困难,并通过电子邮件发送给202所大学的牙髓病学学者。独立危险因素采用二元逻辑回归分析,显著性水平为0.05。结果共有581人(10.7%)同意参与本研究。近一半的参与者(48.2%)表示,他们在进行研究和撰写论文方面接受了某种类型的培训。在回答“你得到统计学家的帮助来对你的研究进行统计分析吗?”的问题时,77.1%的人回答“是的。”大约40%的参与者表示,获得伦理批准的必要性对他们进行研究的愿望产生了负面影响。参与者的地区对所报告的用英语写论文或进行统计分析的困难没有影响(p>0.05)。大多数参与者(81.8%)报告说,无论他们的地区、学历或经验年限如何,在写讨论部分时都有困难。结论参与者表示,他们在许多领域遇到了困难,如进行统计分析、寻找新想法和用英语写作。参与伦理委员会规则的详细审查,扩大生物统计学教育,增加提供研究资助的机构数量,增加牙髓病学期刊的数量,可以提高牙髓病研究人员发表论文的积极性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A 48-month clinical performance of hybrid ceramic fragment restorations manufactured in CAD/CAM in non-carious cervical lesions: case report. Assessment of mechanical allodynia in healthy teeth adjacent and contralateral to endodontically diseased teeth: a clinical study. A global overview of enamel microabrasion for white spot lesions: a bibliometric review. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability and whiteness index of single-shade resin composites after staining and bleaching. Endodontic characteristics of mandibular premolar with dens evaginatus: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1